jtrain609
Antisocial Monster
Re: Even pilot blames JetBlue for 7 hours of tarmac time....
Which, as I see things, is how it should be. We're tasked with flying the public, who is trusting us to make good, reasonable and safe decisions that maximize safety first, and then efficiency. Could I land 90% of the time from an stabilized approach? Of course, I'm not a hack of a pilot. Will touching down at ref + 30 cause me to roll off the end of the runway with 10,000'? Not in my plane. But regardless, just because we can likely create a positive outcome in these situations, we don't do these things because they reduce safety below an acceptable level for the traveling public.
Now to juxtapose that against me in a 172, or me in a different type mission, then those risks may not reduce the acceptable level of safety below whatever is considered acceptable in those segments of the industry. But with part 121 flying, it's simply not reasonable.
True. Whether we like it or not, as I've said, liability is a big factor in decisions to do something or do nothing. Least amount of potential liability is what it'll generally come down to.
Which, as I see things, is how it should be. We're tasked with flying the public, who is trusting us to make good, reasonable and safe decisions that maximize safety first, and then efficiency. Could I land 90% of the time from an stabilized approach? Of course, I'm not a hack of a pilot. Will touching down at ref + 30 cause me to roll off the end of the runway with 10,000'? Not in my plane. But regardless, just because we can likely create a positive outcome in these situations, we don't do these things because they reduce safety below an acceptable level for the traveling public.
Now to juxtapose that against me in a 172, or me in a different type mission, then those risks may not reduce the acceptable level of safety below whatever is considered acceptable in those segments of the industry. But with part 121 flying, it's simply not reasonable.