And as a recruiter who do you hire, the guy who follows the norm and gets a degree or the guy who's trying to cut a corner?Jet, those may be published, but foolish to not get one based on that. Pilots need to set themselves apart and be well rounded. A degree shows that one is well rounded among other things.
Jet, those may be published, but foolish to not get one based on that. Pilots need to set themselves apart and be well rounded. A degree shows that one is well rounded among other things.
"And as a recruiter who do you hire, the guy who follows the norm and gets a degree or the guy who's trying to cut a corner?"
I didn't want to get technical and was going to let this go since I always recommend getting a degree but since you went there, here we go. Notice I quoted your post 21 not post 2.
According to your list in post 2 these are companies that do require a degree which is why you didn't list JetBlue.
But since you want to talk about post #2 we can go there. I'm not even discussing who is or isn't getting hired with or without a degree, just simply the fact that you stated a 4 year degree is required when it isn't.
Southwest: Education: graduation from accredited, four-year college preferred. (not required)
Source: http://www.southwest.com/html/about-southwest/careers/positions/pilots.html
United: Bachelor’s degree from accredited school is preferred. (not required)
Source: http://www.airlineapps.com/Intro/United/
US Airways: Application window is currently closed but during last window. Bachelor’s degree is preferred. (not required) I have seen no evidence of a bachelors degree being required after the merger is complete.
Hawaiian: Two-year degree/college graduate. (4 year degree not required)
Source: https://rn11.ultipro.com/HAW1000/JobBoard/ListJobs.aspx (App window is currently closed)
Delta, FedEx and UPS do require 4 year degrees.
Some of the same airlines also have very low TT requirements and turbine time requirements.
However, what's required, preferred and competitive are not necessarily congruent.
Before we get too excited, there are three, mutually exclusive terms when it comes to minimums:
a. Required (must have)
b. Preferred (we'd like a candidate to have)
c. Competitive (this is who we're actually hiring, generally "required" meeting all of the "preferred" (in most cases) and a good batch of "X" which varies with the quality of the applicant pool)
Please don't be one of the grumpy guys left at the regionals because he failed to meet the competitive minimums, that's not a winning game plan.
The best jobs will always be hyper-competitive. The "second and third tier" choices, not so much.
But my short answer is do what you want as there are plenty of candidates that match the required, competitive and preferred requirements which you will be competing with for that shiny job. They appreciate it!![]()
And even if you have all of the above, get called to say, oh, 2 of the 3 jobs to be had when you have your stuff out, it doesn't mean you're hired....
...ask me how I know...
Mista Kotter! Mista Kotter! OOOH! OOOOH!
Nah.. just got done rocking the 2200-0200 sim.
I shoulda just done the career the right way...
Before we get too excited, there are three, mutually exclusive terms when it comes to minimums:
a. Required (must have)
b. Preferred (we'd like a candidate to have)
c. Competitive (this is who we're actually hiring, generally "required" meeting all of the "preferred" (in most cases) and a good batch of "X" which varies with the quality of the applicant pool)
Please don't be one of the grumpy guys left at the regionals because he failed to meet the competitive minimums, that's not a winning game plan.
The best jobs will always be hyper-competitive. The "second and third tier" choices, not so much.
But my short answer is do what you want as there are plenty of candidates that match the required, competitive and preferred requirements which you will be competing with for that shiny job. They appreciate it!![]()