Do I need to report this to the FAA?

eta71 said:
Wow this thread is a long one. I didn't take the time to read all the replies just yet. I am free and clear of paying the fine and incurring the points to my record. Just got the letter today.
Tony C, I am sure you are without guilt in any regard in your life aren't you? Was I speeding? Probably. Was everyone else? Yes.
Do you live in CA? If so, or if you ever come here, do not talk on your cell phone without a hands free device while driving. It's against the law. Does everyone do it? Yes. Does that make it ok? No.
You do understand that the ticket system in CA brings in a substantial amount of income for the state. The state also fails to inform people about how they can fight a citation. It is much easier to take it in the arse and pay the fine.
I have integrity. I stated in my arguement to the citation that my speed was just with road conditions and flow of traffic. Long story short, I get my bail money back, no points on my record, and no traffic school to attend.

Thanks for stating for us that you are holier than thou. I am sure you never speed. I am sure you would feel great and not want to fight a ticket a couple mph over the posted speed limit. Would you say "thank you officer for citing me, I was over the speed limit and I feel much safer now that you stopped me. Can I pay you now or should I wait to pay later?"

I'll read the rest of these posts and see what the general concensus is. Carry on.


:yeahthat:

Also, i dont think they passed the law about the phone here yet? I heard they tried, but it didnt pass?
 
My mistake then. I thought it did pass.
I didn't worry about it untill my BT headset stopped working.
 
eta71 said:
I am sure you never speed. I am sure you would feel great and not want to fight a ticket a couple mph over the posted speed limit. Would you say "thank you officer for citing me, I was over the speed limit and I feel much safer now that you stopped me.

Another knucklehead downing somebody with the holier than thou arguement when sombody is trying to set a positive precedent!!! I love the sarcasm at the end.
 
Well I've already established you're clearly nuts for not wanting to listen to My Humps 50 times over the course of an hour.

BTW, ... I'm not much of a pop music fan, but Gwen Stefani - Crash... what a catchy little ditty.
 
Chris_Ford said:
Well I've already established you're clearly nuts for not wanting to listen to My Humps 50 times over the course of an hour.

BTW, ... I'm not much of a pop music fan, but Gwen Stefani - Crash... what a catchy little ditty.

LMAO, I do like the beep song by that guy from the Black Eyed Peas and the *****cat Dolls.
 
eta71 said:
Wow this thread is a long one. I didn't take the time to read all the replies just yet.

You should have read more before you tried the "holier than thou" argument. ;) I already explained that I have made plenty of mistakes myself.

Two things you will never hear me bragging about:

1) Being perfect - I'm far from it.

2) Breaking the law and getting away with it, or breaking the law, and trying to get away with it.



I'm passionate about this because there are lives in the balance. I'm not discouraged by your attitude, because I've been "there" myself. When I was your age, my dad was pretty "stupid," too. Fortunately, I lived long enough to see realize just how wise he was, and just how foolish I had been. Hopefully, you'll live long enough to make that same journey.







.
 
I still haven't read all the responses. I'm at work and want to make a quick reply. How old are you since you say "your age"?
Look, my speed wasn't endangering anyone more than any other vehicles on the freeway at the time. Anytime you get into a vehicle or get up out of bed in the morning there are "lives in the balance". Should we wrap ourselves in a bubble and stay inside our entire lives? I know thats a bit extreme.
So by your argument I should have just paid the fine and not contested what I feel to be an inconsistent system.

We all have our pet peeves and things we take to heart. Do lawbreakers who pose a genuine threat to people deserve what they get. Yes. I hate drunk drivers. My brother is paralyzed because of a drunk driver. He had a lot going for him and it is all gone. He had a plane, a good career with a significant income, etc. Now he oversees people who do what he used to.
What I was cited for was small in the big scheme of things and lives were not put at risk anymore than a normal day here on the fwy's of CA.
 
Chris_Ford said:
Keep it PG-13, you sicko!

That's the name of the group. I didn't think anything was wrong since it is the name of a pop group. Looks like somebody or the censor software got to it. My bad!!!!!!!!!!
 
Sprint100 said:
That's the name of the group. I didn't think anything was wrong since it is the name of a pop group. Looks like somebody or the censor software got to it. My bad!!!!!!!!!!

I know, I was just playin', yo.
 
Doug Taylor said:
I drive like a Sun City resident.

Doug, you LOOK like a Sun City resident!

Then there is the "Saudi Nanosecond"...that is the time between the red light changing to green and the first horn blowing!

My experience in driving over there was to put one foot on the gas, one hand on the horn and never, never, never look left or right...that was a sign of weakness! I loved it...a mixture of drafting at Talladega, figure 8 racing, and tractor pulling all rolled into one!

BTW did you come up with any ideas rearding the issue I raised in the PM I sent?
 
Theotokos said:
Oh, I am willing to plead guilty and will. Just want to get the facts straight. I am very glad I did not kill anyone. I understand your concern and I was being somewhat self centered. I will slam on the breaks next time. The guy behind me can get over it.
well, see that's where the 2 sided coin comes in....in one case, you might have to run the red because you don't have time to stop and because there's a guy on your tail that would slam into you otherwise - so that's what you have to do because if the guy slams into you, your at fault period!!

so, in essense, on one side of the coin.. you run the red hoping not to hit someone and end up getting a ticket/fine...on the other side of the coin, you slam on your brakes causing the guy in back of you (whose probably driving too close anyways) to slam into you thereby *causing* an accident and your still at fault...

no real good way around it except to keep watch on those traffic lights as soon as you see them as about 1/2 to 1/4 mile from it, start taking your foot off the gas in anticipation that you will have to stop regardless.
 
Kristie said:
well, see that's where the 2 sided coin comes in....in one case, you might have to run the red because you don't have time to stop and because there's a guy on your tail that would slam into you otherwise - so that's what you have to do because if the guy slams into you, your at fault period!!

so, in essense, on one side of the coin.. you run the red hoping not to hit someone and end up getting a ticket/fine...on the other side of the coin, you slam on your brakes causing the guy in back of you (whose probably driving too close anyways) to slam into you thereby *causing* an accident and your still at fault...

no real good way around it except to keep watch on those traffic lights as soon as you see them as about 1/2 to 1/4 mile from it, start taking your foot off the gas in anticipation that you will have to stop regardless.


Wait, if someone rear ends you, you're at fault? Isn't it the drivers responsibility to keep a safe distance?
 
Bigey said:
Wait, if someone rear ends you, you're at fault? Isn't it the drivers responsibility to keep a safe distance?

Yep, in Cali if you hit somebody from behind you're at fault no matter what the car you hit did.
 
That "Yep" should be a "Nope." The person doing the rear ending is almost always at fault unless there are extenuating circumstances.
 
Mr_Creepy said:
That "Yep" should be a "Nope." The person doing the rear ending is almost always at fault unless there are extenuating circumstances.

I was saying yep to Bigey's second sentence. I think the first sentence was him questioning Kristie's post.
 
Kristie said:
well, see that's where the 2 sided coin comes in....in one case, you might have to run the red because you don't have time to stop and because there's a guy on your tail that would slam into you otherwise - so that's what you have to do because if the guy slams into you, your at fault period!!

so, in essense, on one side of the coin.. you run the red hoping not to hit someone and end up getting a ticket/fine...on the other side of the coin, you slam on your brakes causing the guy in back of you (whose probably driving too close anyways) to slam into you thereby *causing* an accident and your still at fault...

no real good way around it except to keep watch on those traffic lights as soon as you see them as about 1/2 to 1/4 mile from it, start taking your foot off the gas in anticipation that you will have to stop regardless.

Ahh, yes, another myth that leads to the perception that we just cannot avoid accidents.

The "real good way around it" is found in the Second Point of the Smith System of Defensive Driving: "Get the Big Picture." Not only should you be looking ahead to where your vehicle will travel, but you should be aware of vehicles and hazards on either side of you and behind you. If there is another car following you at an unsafe distance, be proactive at removing the hazard. Slow down, easing on the brakes and displaying the brake lights. That doesn't mean slam on your brakes so that he has to lock his brakes, but rather to slowly and cautiously slow down. Chances are, he'll go around you. If he doesn't, your reduced speed will improve the chances that he'll be able to stop when you stop. If there's a lane that you can change in to, do it. If there is only one lane, and he refuses to back off, turn off the road and allow him to pass. Whatever it takes, don't allow another car to endanger your safety by following you too closely. Waiting until you're approaching an intersection with a yellow light at 60 miles an hour to think to check your rear-view mirror is too late. Always know what's going on around you.


See there - - you're not helpless.




Oh, and if someone hits you from behind, it'll be his fault. Of course, you'll still have to visit the body shop, but he'll get the ticket. I prefer to avoid tickets AND body shops. :)




.
 
TonyC said:
Ahh, yes, another myth that leads to the perception that we just cannot avoid accidents.

The "real good way around it" is found in the Second Point of the Smith System of Defensive Driving: "Get the Big Picture." Not only should you be looking ahead to where your vehicle will travel, but you should be aware of vehicles and hazards on either side of you and behind you. If there is another car following you at an unsafe distance, be proactive at removing the hazard. Slow down, easing on the brakes and displaying the brake lights. That doesn't mean slam on your brakes so that he has to lock his brakes, but rather to slowly and cautiously slow down. Chances are, he'll go around you. If he doesn't, your reduced speed will improve the chances that he'll be able to stop when you stop. If there's a lane that you can change in to, do it. If there is only one lane, and he refuses to back off, turn off the road and allow him to pass. Whatever it takes, don't allow another car to endanger your safety by following you too closely. Waiting until you're approaching an intersection with a yellow light at 60 miles an hour to think to check your rear-view mirror is too late. Always know what's going on around you.


See there - - you're not helpless.




Oh, and if someone hits you from behind, it'll be his fault. Of course, you'll still have to visit the body shop, but he'll get the ticket. I prefer to avoid tickets AND body shops. :)




.


Cool.

For me, anyone starts tailing me, i dont even waste my time. Pull to the side when possible, and let him go.

Brake CHECKING IS NOT THE WAY TO GO! Especially in Socal! All the gangsters here have guns, so having someone pull up next to you pissed off cuz you scared them, is not very fun!

The best driving skill is being a defensive driver. Expect, and anticipate.
 
For me, anyone starts tailing me, i dont even waste my time. Pull to the side when possible, and let him go.

That's the most intelligent thing you've said on this board to date.

But I have a question, your profile says you are 15. WHAT STATE LETS 15 YR OLDS DRIVE?
 
Back
Top