learhawkerbe400
Well-Known Member
If you don't like them then don't bid them. It's that simple.
Nope, I'm just putting out the extra stuff since one majorly huge operation of an airline and it's pilot group and actually considering introducing them.
If you don't like them then don't bid them. It's that simple.
If you don't like them then don't bid them. It's that simple.
It is in the Delta TA for CDOs?
If you don't like them then don't bid them. It's that simple.
The other concern is relaxing the rules to the new FAA FDP limits.
Aren't majors supposed to easily have work rules that exceed the government regs?
I get that guys are upset about the prospect of SDPs. However, are they any less unsafe than some of the rotations we have that have a redeye built into the middle? We have some that are early morning sign day one, finish late afternoon. day two early morning with one leg finish by 0900. That night, fly a redeye into day three. Layover. Day four, early morning show to finish in the afternoon. Even though we get close to 24 off after the redeye, dY four is still an ass dragger.
Yeah, that was one of the bullet points of the whole thing.
Yeah we did those at colgan. The hybrid lines sucked!And the science says that being on a night schedule all the time is fine for safety. That's why at XJT, if you had CDO's, you had a pure line of CDO's and were expected to stay on a night schedule on your days off.
But when you start mixing CDO's in with day flying, you're asking for a fatigue call.
Best case scenario is what most guys count on when thinking about bidding something. Couldn't agree with you more. The best case scenario for the senior CDO'S is 7-8 hours at the hotel, which is better than the old reduced rest of 8 hours. Throw in some snow storms this past February and the best case scenario went flying out the window faster than @amorris311 can finish his plate of food at Beirut in DTW.Here's my opinion on the 'if you don't like them, don't bid them' angle.
Of course, if I may profess an opinion.
We had an issue with international flights heading into MED/"Malaria Endemic Destinations".
The CDC guidance that if you have a certain amount of exposure in the area, they heavily suggest Malarone before the exposure, during the time in the MED and for a period of time after leaving the MED. Of course, it's a pain in the butt so the idea was "if you don't like it, don't bid it".
And a lot of people didn't.
We developed provisions and protections, eventually, but the powers-that-be, in their moment of "OMG! We did something!" didn't have strong provisions for reserve pilots and re-routes.
So the company because very adept at canceling your flight, using 'recovery' provisions to re-route you to an MED and then have a reserve crew fly your original flight. So you bid and were packed for a transoceanic trip to FCO, a little rain hits JFK and now you're headed to Ghana in the rainy season with no Malarone and hopefully you have some bug spray you can leech off someone.
I have a story, best left for "over beers" about when I refused a re-assignment to a MED and the hilarity that ensued afterwards.
We like to think in terms of "best case scenario" when it comes to a new idea, but seemingly forget that the company will bend, twist and re-interpret any grey area you leave in your language. And then you have to waste negotiating capital to fix it down the road.
Ehh, you now what, never mind. What the hell do I know.
Always ask yourself: "Is this Scheduling with Safety?"
Doesn't matter what they pay or how convenient they are for some.
Point is, if we want stronger contractual language (which we should want) to protect CDOs and/or eliminate them, let us not forget to look in the mirror about what we do to ourself to squeeze a few extra hours at home. I know some places have looked at jumpseat records to make this point in negotiations over this.
If you don't like them then don't bid them. It's that simple.
Except that it isn't. It depends heavily on seniority and the language in one's contract/agreement concerning these types of trips and forcing them on people who don't bid for them. At my company stand-ups/high speeds/CDO's are liked by a senior few and loathed by most of the rest of us riff-raff. The senior folks get their choice of these trips while the rest are forced on the schedules of people too junior to not fly them even when we bid to avoid them. Often they would show up just before or just after a multi day trip, and there is no way to change your sleep schedule to accommodate that nonsense. As a result, many of us ended up calling out fatigued and losing out on pay as a result.
At my last airline I spent a lot of time on the phone with managers discussing the safety of converting me (an AM reserve) to fly a stand-up that night after calling and waking me at 0400 to inform me that I was now "on rest" until my 2200 show time that night. I purposely bid away from stand ups/stand up reserve because I loathed doing them there as well but I still ended up flying way more than I ever cared to.
I understand a lot of this could be solved with stronger language as a way of mitigating this issue but short of rewriting/giving up negotiating capital to solve this, a lot of pilots are still going to be forced to fly trips they don't bid for and can't properly prepare for.