kellwolf
Piece of Trash
Well, I tried. All I can say is I don't see Delta changing the policy...and since the majority of the people who work for DCI carriers are paying the $50/$200 non-rev fee they have no economic reason to lower it. Basic supply/demand. I guess it comes full circle back to this - if you don't like the fact that you can't sit in the back w/o paying the $50, then don't jumpseat on delta or pay the $50.
In reality, if you pay the $50, and non-rev anywhere international (you can't jumpseat internationally even in the cabin on any carriers AFIK being a dci carrier) it will have more than paid for itself. YMMV
Yeah, you an jumpseat internationally. You just can't sit up front. DCI carrier or not. Hence the reason an American Eagle or whomever can jumpseat all they want internationally (they just have to pay the taxes), but us contract DCI guys start getting charged extra after a certain point just because we "occupy a seat in the back." They call it "non-reving" because you can't sit up front internationally. I can walk up to jetBlue, list for a jumpseat to Columbia and go down there just fine as long as there is a seat in the back. Same for a jetBlue guy on Delta that wants to go to YYZ or London. So, TECHNICALLY, a DCI guy can't "jumpseat" b/c of the nutso nomenclature on our travel benefits.
I know they're not going to change the policy. Heck, their business model is built on "If you don't like it, tough. You don't have any other options." Just look at some of the prices out of MEM and MSP, and you can see that. The only reason I paid the fee in the first place was because I was in MEM. I had no other options. Now that I'm not, well, I don't really plan on paying it next year anyway. I'm RARELY on Delta at this point anyway.