Helodriver27
Well-Known Member
The reason that I am asking this question, (aside from wanting numerous opinions from active CFI's) is that I'm not sure what's better for both sides of the fence(student and CFI/school). I was going to a school that charged for instructor time in a manner I thought was pretty much "you're getting what you're paying for". By this I mean however much time you are face-to-face with a CFI, is the time you are getting billed for. From my understanding, this is pretty standard, no? And fair. The instructor that I had at this flight school resigned because of managerial issues, and "less than par" aircraft maintenance. He didn't feel as though he could continue flying with them and maintain a clear conscious knowing the things that he knew. So he quit. I support his decision, no questions asked...except, who am I going to learn from now? (He is currently working on doing his own training on the side...but this is a topic of discussion for another time). Enter Part Deux of this thread...
What do you think of a flight school that charges you in "block time"; say, 2 hours at a time...regardless of how much CFI face time you get? For example, I want to go up for an hour that day because it's all that my schedule will allow (work, or otherwise). Flight school and CFI both reap the benefit of that 2 hours regardless of how much their services were used.
I'm just looking for a few opinions. And I'm sure that I will get plenty highlighting the details of the PRO's and CON's of their rebuttal. I understand that a CFI's time is worth money...I am not at all arguing that. But is it right or wrong, that they are getting paid when they're not working for it? Thanks...
What do you think of a flight school that charges you in "block time"; say, 2 hours at a time...regardless of how much CFI face time you get? For example, I want to go up for an hour that day because it's all that my schedule will allow (work, or otherwise). Flight school and CFI both reap the benefit of that 2 hours regardless of how much their services were used.
I'm just looking for a few opinions. And I'm sure that I will get plenty highlighting the details of the PRO's and CON's of their rebuttal. I understand that a CFI's time is worth money...I am not at all arguing that. But is it right or wrong, that they are getting paid when they're not working for it? Thanks...