There's so much testosterone flowing on both sides of the debate, I'm afraid that if I go offline, someone's going to "ballwalk" my forum to prove their manhood!![]()
I liked the post better before...it was right.
-mini
How are the loads usually from CVG to PHX . . . any idea?
Ok but dudes for serious, we were having a legit discussion about technique and autopilot disconnection, which I think was a good discussion until we all started saying, "Yeah well my way is the only way and #### the FOM, #### freight pilots, #### autopilots, #### RJ's and #### YOU!!!!"
I liked the post better before...it was right.
-mini
*edit to add*
Do you RJ/ATR/general 121 drivers have a policy in the manual requiring you to program the box and use the flight director for everything? I'm not asking to be a smart-arse, I'm just trying to understand why everyone says the PNF is so busy programing the computer when you should be able to fly of of raw data at this level. If it's a manual/ops thing, I understand. If it's just pilots needing the automation...I don't get it. Not that automation isn't nice...it certainly is. Does it help? Absolutely. But to say that it's dangerous to hand fly to minimums and missed approaches and raw data...it just doesn't add up to me.
And there are times when you should say...automation off (FOM permitting), fly the dang airplane. Green source is not your enemy!!!AP is mandatory on CAT II. As far as flying raw data, you could, but using the FD is safer and more efficient. Its not dangerous to hand fly to minimums and do the missed approaches and raw data, but the margin for error increases as does the workload. Sure you can do it but its not necessary unless you want to boast your ego as a superpilotIt kinda like having power steering in your car but saying 'to hell with it, I can drive without it' Why make things harder for yourself?
And there are times when you should say...automation off (FOM permitting), fly the dang airplane. Green source is not your enemy!!!
I have no experience with Cat II so I'll let the bus drivers handle that oneTrue dat! But those situations are not on Cat II approaches.
All that crap goes out the window on visuals for me. The FD comes off, the autopilot obviously comes off and I hand fly the thing around the pattern. I had one captain ask me what the heck I was doing, not flying the ILS when it was clear and a million and I was in the left downwind. It's still an airplane, and will fly just like a regular airplane!
Do you RJ/ATR/general 121 drivers have a policy in the manual requiring you to program the box and use the flight director for everything? I'm not asking to be a smart-arse, I'm just trying to understand why everyone says the PNF is so busy programing the computer when you should be able to fly of of raw data at this level. If it's a manual/ops thing, I understand. If it's just pilots needing the automation...I don't get it. Not that automation isn't nice...it certainly is. Does it help? Absolutely. But to say that it's dangerous to hand fly to minimums and missed approaches and raw data...it just doesn't add up to me.
AP is mandatory on CAT II. As far as flying raw data, you could, but using the FD is safer and more efficient. Its not dangerous to hand fly to minimums and do the missed approaches and raw data, but the margin for error increases as does the workload. Sure you can do it but its not necessary unless you want to boast your ego as a superpilotIt kinda like having power steering in your car but saying 'to hell with it, I can drive without it' Why make things harder for yourself?
If you have a Captain that does that, simply tell him that you'd prefer him/her to fly every leg. They'll get the message quick.
When a Captain has an authority issue, I let them be totally in charge. Want me to start the APU? You're gonna have to tell me. I'm not gonna do squat until you tell me to.
That CA was obviously a • for various reasons, but I do agree with him about the APU. I never start the APU without asking the skipper first. On the CRJ, I always wanted to wait until as late as possible to start it to save not just the fuel, but time on the APU. Pinnacle's service contract with Garrett is priced base on a ratio of APU hours to flight time. The lower the ratio, the lower the cost. So, I always timed the APU start pretty late on the approach. I certainly wouldn't have snapped at you if you started it then, but I would have asked you to ask me before starting it from now on.
But to totally blow of a limitation (which is just one of the many things this guy did to get on my "do not fly with" list) is just.....well, retarded.
The anal pilot in me just doesn't like amber caution messages on the EICAS when they can be avoided.
True dat! But those situations are not on Cat II approaches.
All that crap goes out the window on visuals for me. The FD comes off, the autopilot obviously comes off and I hand fly the thing around the pattern. I had one captain ask me what the heck I was doing, not flying the ILS when it was clear and a million and I was in the left downwind. It's still an airplane, and will fly just like a regular airplane!