An Increasing Trend on Jetcareers . . .

I think that this "use teh search button n00b!!!!111" phenomenon is common on most every forum that I've ever been to. Part of why I actually enjoy using this forum, is because it seems to me that people here are much more civil and less likely to do that sort of thing than people in most places. (Even when someone gets drunk and wants to do a "wooooo I'm Drukn!!!" post, at least they have the common courtesy to do it in the Lav, not in General Topics) Also I've noticed a general lack of immature flame wars here, which although I never participate in myself, must be hard to avoid because you see them everywhere too. All in all, like I always say "if you call someone a n00b, that just means that you are a n00b" hehe.

edit: Hey!! my 200th post, does that mean that i'm not a n00b anymore?
cool.gif
 
Well, we're a pretty tight group here on JC so it mostly self-moderates. Everyone pretty much understands my idea of having the forum feel like casual chat in the living room.
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
For example, if i wanted to search a topic about short field landings, a ton of threads will pop up just because the word landings. Then I would have to go from page to page to see if theres a specific thread that answers what im looking for.

[/ QUOTE ]

You could just search like this : +"short field landings"

That'll reaaallllyyyyy make it easier!!

Don't they teach this in college??
grin.gif


[/ QUOTE ]
shocked.gif
really? even I didn't know that and I've found searching to be a pain as well....

I'm thinking we need to put that in the FAQ section of JC....
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
For example, if i wanted to search a topic about short field landings, a ton of threads will pop up just because the word landings. Then I would have to go from page to page to see if theres a specific thread that answers what im looking for.

[/ QUOTE ]

You could just search like this : +"short field landings"

That'll reaaallllyyyyy make it easier!!

Don't they teach this in college??
grin.gif


[/ QUOTE ]
shocked.gif
really? even I didn't know that and I've found searching to be a pain as well....

I'm thinking we need to put that in the FAQ section of JC....

[/ QUOTE ]

Do I get credit??
grin.gif
 
depends on the "type" of credit
wink.gif


of course you get full credit!! AND i'll even buy you a beer in LV
grin.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
depends on the "type" of credit
wink.gif


of course you get full credit!! AND i'll even buy you a beer in LV
grin.gif


[/ QUOTE ]

smile.gif


Does alot for beer . . .
grin.gif
 
Well, lets look at this...

The only rating anyone is set into, is by how many posts they have. This is great in some stiuations, but is very contriversial in others. I personally have lurked for about two years, since one of my students let me know about the site, till about 3-4 months ago, when I figured my opinion might, just maybe, be listened to. Then I had to remember that true knowledge is knowing that you know nothing. I have taken my fair share of that. Just because I have less then 150 posts here on this site leaves the subject very obscure. At the same time if the rating system was changed, ie, giving a subject such as Time, Types of ac flown, current job, etc it would be very simple to create a false hierarchy. Perfect example is myself. There are many out there who have their heart set on flying for a regional, and progressing as quickly as possible to a major and working up the ladder. The problem is that I don't see myself taking the less then minium pay to fly a jet, I instead would like to progress more logically, from CFI to 135 piston twin, to what ever is next. Some people see that as a step sideways, because I am not reaching my potential with the times that I have. But I disagree. I think instead of flying for an airline (regional) with little better then CFI pay is a SLAP IN THE MOTHER F(#)%(#NG FACE, I would rather work for a company who has respect for their employees and is willing to pay them for their time and experience. This is the problem. Some may take my word for a little less then from a member who posts from their GIA graduate, Pinnacle FO position. Of which I cannot say anything bad about personally, but it is not the road for me. My point being, that in any situation, the only way to create a hierarchy of posters is to have personal opinions from the Admin. He (Doug) gets the final word on all of those types of decisions, and has made moderators out of a few. Those decisions should be made from Doug, and Out of Doug's opinion. I haven't always agreed with Doug or the moderators, but if I were to agree all the time, there would be no conversation.

IMO.... LET YOUR OPINION BE KNOWN AND POST IT... IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION AND SOMEONE GIVES YOU A HARD TIME, LET THEM KNOW THAT THEIR UN-SUPPORTIVE SPIRIT KILLS THE BASIC PREMIS OF THIS FOURM. IMO

Also, Sarcasm is great in the Lav, but in General topics, we should all respect the posters questions, and give in our best professional opinion, an answer that will help the poster through the point in the career that they are at.
 
There's a built-in rating system in the software, but the first 'wah, I'm a three, who rated me low Doug? Make the pain stop!' and I'm deactivating it again!
 
oh oh.. i have 4 (count em...1..2..3..4) STARS!

Yippeeeee....only problem is that it doesn't make me smarter in the pilot dept cuz i, like, ain't one!
tongue.gif


oh well, i've got other worse problems to deal with.. haha
grin.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
Also, Sarcasm is great in the Lav, but in General topics,

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, right. Like THAT'll happen
sarcasm.gif



smile.gif
Dude, you know me. I'm one of the most sarcastic people on the planet, but I know when to flip the switch into the Oscar-Foxtrot-Foxtrot position.
 
[ QUOTE ]
There's a built-in rating system in the software, but the first 'wah, I'm a three, who rated me low Doug? Make the pain stop!' and I'm deactivating it again!

[/ QUOTE ]

The least you could do is reset everyone back to zero. I'm at two only due to the smear campaign Eagle instigated way back when, yet he and I ended up getting along famously. (Though I'll probably get the same treatment from DE727UPS.)
 
SQL plus 0100 plus a vacation-friendly gin 'n tonic aren't quite consistent with "simple"!
smile.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
For example, if i wanted to search a topic about short field landings, a ton of threads will pop up just because the word landings. Then I would have to go from page to page to see if theres a specific thread that answers what im looking for.

[/ QUOTE ]You could just search like this : +"short field landings"

That'll reaaallllyyyyy make it easier!!

Don't they teach this in college??
grin.gif


[/ QUOTE ]
shocked.gif
really? even I didn't know that and I've found searching to be a pain as well....

I'm thinking we need to put that in the FAQ section of JC....

[/ QUOTE ]The "quotation marks" trick can be used in pretty much all search engines. It really helps filter out the irrelevant hits when you are stalk...er, I mean "Googling" someone.
grin.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
read the first portion of thi thread...You will see the answer there.
grin.gif


[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, sorry about that. I just read the first few posts and replied.
 
Back
Top