Yes, but the executive bonuses aren't what bankrupted the airline. Competing with bankrupt airlines are what bankrupted them. The management bonuses are a huge slap in the face, but APA should have known that the business model was not sustainable. I assume they pay guys to know that sort of thing, but I have no idea.
Personally, I would rather see the company fail or, better yet, be bought/merged by another legacy than to have this proposed contract applied to a legacy. This is class warfare and we have to stand up for our livelyhood.
Jesus, stand up for your livelihood by causing the collapse of an airline that employs 80,000 people? What do you think that'll do to the middle class then?
Repeat after me: You're only worth what you negotiate, not what you think you deserve because you sit in the front end of an airplane and wear a tie.
I think that is the idea. The union is not using the courts to get something out of the company it is the other way around. The company agreed to terms aka negotiated and is now not living up to their end.
I'm not denying that, or wishing to weaken the union's position in any way; I'm simply responding to the idea that the pilots should let the company fail in order to take a stand.
Best of luck to AMR employees.
So, would you rather the union cave, then watch as everyone else re-does what they did a few years ago to bring their contracts into line with the "new standard" that would be AMR's new deal? I'm sure every airline manager out there would LOVE to get rid of monthly guarantee. Those guys and gals flying highspeeds get paid more than they fly every month. AMR's deal would open the door to the rest of the airlines ditching that. I agree with subpilot. There's a time to bend and go with the flow, but there's a line where you have to put your foot down and say "Enough is enough." AMR's proposal, IMO, crosses that line.