American Airlines may cut up to 15,000 jobs

Yes, but the executive bonuses aren't what bankrupted the airline. Competing with bankrupt airlines are what bankrupted them. The management bonuses are a huge slap in the face, but APA should have known that the business model was not sustainable. I assume they pay guys to know that sort of thing, but I have no idea.

The price of oil wasn't anywhere near what it is now when they agreed to those concessions, either....
 
Personally, I would rather see the company fail or, better yet, be bought/merged by another legacy than to have this proposed contract applied to a legacy. This is class warfare and we have to stand up for our livelyhood.

Jesus, stand up for your livelihood by causing the collapse of an airline that employs 80,000 people? What do you think that'll do to the middle class then?

Repeat after me: You're only worth what you negotiate, not what you think you deserve because you sit in the front end of an airplane and wear a tie.
 
Jesus, stand up for your livelihood by causing the collapse of an airline that employs 80,000 people? What do you think that'll do to the middle class then?

Repeat after me: You're only worth what you negotiate, not what you think you deserve because you sit in the front end of an airplane and wear a tie.

I think that is the idea. The union is not using the courts to get something out of the company it is the other way around. The company agreed to terms aka negotiated and is now not living up to their end.
 
I think that is the idea. The union is not using the courts to get something out of the company it is the other way around. The company agreed to terms aka negotiated and is now not living up to their end.

I'm not denying that, or wishing to weaken the union's position in any way; I'm simply responding to the idea that the pilots should let the company fail in order to take a stand.

Best of luck to AMR employees.
 
I'm not denying that, or wishing to weaken the union's position in any way; I'm simply responding to the idea that the pilots should let the company fail in order to take a stand.

Best of luck to AMR employees.

So, would you rather the union cave, then watch as everyone else re-does what they did a few years ago to bring their contracts into line with the "new standard" that would be AMR's new deal? I'm sure every airline manager out there would LOVE to get rid of monthly guarantee. Those guys and gals flying highspeeds get paid more than they fly every month. AMR's deal would open the door to the rest of the airlines ditching that. I agree with subpilot. There's a time to bend and go with the flow, but there's a line where you have to put your foot down and say "Enough is enough." AMR's proposal, IMO, crosses that line.
 
So, would you rather the union cave, then watch as everyone else re-does what they did a few years ago to bring their contracts into line with the "new standard" that would be AMR's new deal? I'm sure every airline manager out there would LOVE to get rid of monthly guarantee. Those guys and gals flying highspeeds get paid more than they fly every month. AMR's deal would open the door to the rest of the airlines ditching that. I agree with subpilot. There's a time to bend and go with the flow, but there's a line where you have to put your foot down and say "Enough is enough." AMR's proposal, IMO, crosses that line.

No, I wouldn't rather the union cave. The union should do what it's supposed to do: Negotiate for the best deal, while ensuring that its membership continues to have a place to work. The company's first proposal is always some lowball piece of crap, as we saw that at my company with our first tentative agreement (which we overwhelmingly rejected). Putting a line in the sand with a company that's consistently profitable is one thing; AMR lost almost $2 billion last year, and is bankrupt.

Honestly, one of the things that annoys me most about this career field is the prima donna attitude, as well as myopic view many pilots have toward their own livelihoods and airlines. I mean, are there really people out there who'd rather take a 100% pay cut, putting tens of thousands out of work, just to take a stand? What does that do for anyone?

Again, nobody is saying that the union should crumble (though, I'm sure I'll get several people who'll accuse me of saying that), only that they should protect the membership from job loss and negotiate to the greatest extent possible. I see my union dues as payment for a service; that service being to protect my interests and keep me employed. I don't pay them each month so they'll try to get my pilot group to put the company under. Guess who loses in that scenario?
 
Back
Top