TwoTwoLeft
o- - - - - - -l
"Your answer is technically correct, but useless."
Speaking of useless... There once was this examiner who liked to ask private applicants if a student could get SVFR.... WHY???
"Your answer is technically correct, but useless."
At work, special VFR operations are not authorized, so that's right out.Speaking of useless... There once was this examiner who liked to ask private applicants if a student could get SVFR.... WHY???
It's also possible that controlled airspace is above VFR weather minimums, but you cannot fly in it...can you describe that scenario???
Inability to maintain minimum safe altitudes?Nobody going to take a crack at this one? Come on... this is easy!
Inability to maintain minimum safe altitudes?
Nobody going to take a crack at this one? Come on... this is easy!
At work, special VFR operations are not authorized, so that's right out.
At home, there's only two airports (you can guess which ones, probably) I'd go SVFR into or out of. Same goes for a contact approach, and I'd have to be pretty hard up to want one of either operations.
Hopefully it was a good applicant and the DPE was having a bit of fun since (a) it's irrelevant to a private pilot and (b) there is no good answer with a solid reference.Speaking of useless... There once was this examiner who liked to ask private applicants if a student could get SVFR.... WHY???
That's one of the two airports, because I know where all the things to hit are (very familiar).I use SVFR all the time getting in and out of OXR. When I need to go off shore and find things in the water when CIGs are below 1000ft, VFR on top is useless to me.
The ultimate explanation for Gleim's "correct" answer was that the FSDO that gave approval to the course wanted that answer.