Airbus Safety Officer on Reliance on Automation

Right, but I think he is correct about the reg itself. Your procedures (and ours) are more restrictive than the FAR.

I'm fairly sure that at ASA it didn't have to be engaged. It just had to be operational. That may have changed since I left, but that was my memory. I remember that because we had conversations about it at least a few times during the merger with XJT.

You are correct.
 
We had an AA jumpseater last week in one of the oldest 320s. I asked him how old he thought it was.

"5.. maybe 10 years?"

"It's actually 25 years old."

"Wow! Not exactly the plastic throwaway airplane that all the Boeing people said it was"


I hand flew up to 18, then all automation off visual approach to 12 into MIA. :) There was also an MD-88 check airman in the other jumpseat. "It was fantastic to see an airbus guy actually turn it all off! I was beginning to think the airplane wasn't capable of that!"
It actually is a plastic throwaway airplane. That's why it looks so good still. All the plastic upfront can be replaced and looks like new. I flew an Old braniff one last week and the only real giveaway was the trim wheel had been repainted and looked like shcrap.
 
I derive intense satisfaction from doing that, and blanking the FMA, on clear days.

Incidentally, I'm told our new SOPM states that we are to use the autothrottles the whole time. :confused:
Ah, that just means keep it on. Doesn't say anything about overriding it.

Oh, and I hope they fixed 106 and 116's knack for kicking the auto throttles off in flight.
 
Hahah wellllll, 200 seems just lower than I've ever heard before. Can't be flying against the book now, can we?
I just glanced; it's in Operating Philosophy.

-shrug-

Being me, I put it on when I think I need it put on, and I turn it off, when I think I need to turn it off.
 
No no no!! They mean TCS it!
grumpy-cat-no-1.jpg
 
Back
Top