Minuteman
Moⅾerator
The values recorded by the EAFR update for this indication once per second (technically, once every 960 milliseconds).Was it 1 second apart, or .01 seconds apart? If it’s the latter, that’s some extremely fast switchology there.
The values recorded by the EAFR update for this indication once per second (technically, once every 960 milliseconds).Was it 1 second apart, or .01 seconds apart? If it’s the latter, that’s some extremely fast switchology there.
I think the report addresses this right above those photos:
So maybe they moved aft during the impact?
That's a real good point.We don't know if the engines rolled back before the switches were moved to cutoff do we?
Good catch, thanks!
As a firedude, what kind of training or guidance have you received about when a large carbon fiber & polymer structure has crashed and is on fire?literally no crash site security of any kind.
As a firedude, what kind of training or guidance have you received about when a large carbon fiber & polymer structure has crashed and is on fire?
I was wondering what was taking so long to get some kind of statement on what they think happened. It makes sense that they delayed putting out this report knowing the liability their airline and maybe even government will face this being a deliberate act.
I don’t know that for sure, but it wouldn’t be the first time a government try’s to protect themselves or the country’s airline.
And China Eastern Airlines 5735. Except they took it a step further by refusing to release the final reportAir Egypt 990. I referenced the Wiki page earlier.
I mean… you’ve flown a Boeing airplane right?It seems like a poor design on Boeing’s part to allow fuel cut off switches to cut fuel without the thrust livers at idle.
Laughs in Max anti ice making engines go poofI mean… you’ve flown a Boeing airplane right?
That's a real good point.
I was wondering what was taking so long to get some kind of statement on what they think happened. It makes sense that they delayed putting out this report knowing the liability their airline and maybe even government will face this being a deliberate act.
I don’t know that for sure, but it wouldn’t be the first time a government try’s to protect themselves or the country’s airline.
It seems like a poor design on Boeing’s part to allow fuel cut off switches to cut fuel without the thrust livers at idle.
Air Egypt 990. I referenced the Wiki page earlier.
Egypt officially transferred investigation to the NTSB. The NTSB got it correct, it was suicide due to the FO actions. Egyptians love da Nile, and will always deny to preserve their country, their image, their own self-respect.
You can’t trust anything aviation coming from Egyptians. The Paris-Cairo A320 was another example. Blamed a bomb and moved on, despite zero evidence on human remains or aircraft recovered parts. It transfers the blame to French airport security. Reality was much more complex, with numerous cautions and warnings going off in the flight deck for smoke.
NTSB moved to transfer the investigation to the FBI. The Egyptians refused. The NTSB knew the FO crashed the aircraft intentionally. They didn't know why. I wouldn't be surprised if this happens with this crash as well.
Frankly I'm just happy this isn't a Boeing issue. For numerous reasons.
As a firedude, what kind of training or guidance have you received about when a large carbon fiber & polymer structure has crashed and is on fire?
Better be upwind of it, even with SCBA on. While the actual firefighting portion is relatively the same as an aluminium aircraft in terms of toxic gases and such that you need to avoid, broken or burning composite materials release an untold number of carbon microfibers that can’t be seen, and which breathing of them can cause all kinds of respiratory problems, even some distance from the wreckage itself depending on winds, smoke plume, etc. This forces firefighters to be on theIr SCBA masks or some form of microfiber filter mask for much longer than just the firefighting portion of the work, but for rescue and salvage also, which not only gets extremely fatiguing, but is also inefficient in trying to do expedient rescue or search work, and results in materials such as SCBA bottles being used up much faster than normal. Which can be a problem if there isn’t an adequate supply or refill ability for these. That carbon fiber stuff is great structurally as an aircraft or car part, but it’s got some nasty drawbacks when broken/shredded/burning. Breathing in the particles has some serious ramifications to the lungs, both short and even long term.