Queboat
Well-Known Member
Florida_Flyer said:A lot of what has been said here is true. I can think of many positive things about Aviator. There are people, James, Mary, Pierre, Cindy and all of the instructors who will do there best to help you through your training. These are the people who realy manage Aviator. Without them the wheels would fall off the Aviator wagon.
However there are a few things that I just can't agree with on this thread. I don't like posting anything negative but it seems I'm the only one prepared to give a different perspective of Aviator. Before I came to this school I read the Ariben forum on JC and things seemed to be all sweetness and light. I wish someone had the guts to give a different perspective and help me make an informed choice. Some of what Aviator_Instructor says is true but I just can't agree with some things.
So, who was the last person to complete the course in six months including instructor ratings? Can you name a couple of the twenty current instructors that completed the course in this time? As for completing on budget that is hard, mainly because of the extra months that the course WILL take. Also, greedy MC has banned us from flying out the commercial requirements with a MEI timebuilder. One of my buddies spent an extra thousand bucks to do "training" that could have been done for no extra cost. He can thank MC for this. As for the instructor ratings, read my post on the instructor ratings thread. I would say it takes the average Aviator student an extra $6000 (due to extra living costs) and 9-12 months to complete the pro course. Do not come here expecting to finish on time and budget. If you want to get done fast and cheap go to ATP.
I visited ATP last week. The aircraft are not 2004 Seminoles; in fact most were 1970's vintage, just like the Duchesses, renting for similar money. The ATP Semionoles were all in excellent condition with a standard avionics fit. The paint wasn't falling off 5090M style and they were not soaked in oil. If the plane isn't safe I ain't goin' but sometimes Aviator machines have broken in the air in a big way on me and my friends! It's always a good flight when you land with two working engines and a radio. ATP have far better MX and much nicer aircraft.
Dude, you're an instructor; you should know the regs, but I don't think you do! My instructor told me that to be airworthy the aircraft has to comply with its type certificate and type design. If an ADF is fitted and it's bust then the aircraft is not airworthy unless it's placarded inop. As for repairing the ADF at the 100 hour; hahahahaha, doesn't happen! We all know that the ADF's in 30K, 36M, 78D, 38D, 44T and others have been inop for a long time. Are they placarded inop? Perhaps Aviator Instructor might get the chance to explain to the Feds his version of the regs during a ramp check. Flying the aircraft like this is not strictly legal, no matter what MC and Ed will tell you.
Well I would like to leave and I sure am working on it. It's not like choosing between NBC and ABC though. Once you are part way through training you are heavily commited. If I moved to ATP I would probably never be hired by them unless I complete the full course. To some extent I have to make a stand. Once I have the ratings I'm working on and there is no money left in my account though, goodbye.
This is not what he told me! He told me that I would be done in six months if I worked hard. Well Mike, I have worked hard and so have many other people. Where are our ratings? I also believed that the aircraft would be in better condition. The ad in AOPA pilot said that they do have all the bells and whistles. WX radar, GPS on all and coupled autopilots. In reality you are lucky if the aircraft is airworthy; coupled AP's are an MC fantasy. And what is he telling people in his advertising now. Well, it seems that Mike is offering placement assistance with ASA and Sky West. Can anyone name one instructor who has been placed with these airlines? This is shameless lie and I am tempted to report Aviator to AOPA for false advertising.
Sorry to be negative again but I'm just speaking for the dozens of frustrated Aviators out there wanting to get done and get gone.
Florida_Flyer you are XXXXXXXXXX you wouldn't last 10 minutes in the real world. quit whining
1st- you must be an ohh so joy to fly with. Bit of Advice to you. Personality will take you further in Aviation than any amount of flight time. I would know I left the aviator to fly a lear 55 with 800 hours.I charmed my way into a jet. I should've be a lawyer.
2nd- I see you lack the man power to endure a career in aviation. If you couldn't "survive" the aviator you should just hang it up right now.
3rd-Mike Cohen is a big teddy bear compared to any 135 chief pilot barking in your ear like a god damn drill sergant while your HAND flying (dont worry about no stinking autopilot)his $10 million jet when your off GS 1/4 dot. Forget about being a freigt dog, you'd get eaten alive.
4th- I could name a few people that finished the pro course in less than 6 months. These people studied, I mean all day every day. Ask around about a colombian guy named Hernan. He did the pro course on summer break between semesters at college. Me, I did it in nine with a 1 month and a 2 month break mixed in. You do the math. By the way I was under on my account when I finished. Imagine that I spent less than 25k to get all my ratings at the Aviator.