Seeing
@derg post and the others re the lack of common equipment on the older machines gives me thots/questions.
The Tomahawk was Pipers response to a survey of CFI's that called for a training plane that was not so benign as to make it difficult to teach more challenging things (stalls/spins). WW2 trainers were often more challenging (T-6) than the frontline fighters in many ways. From what I've heard an old 6-pack steam gauge is more difficult IFR wise than a glass panel techno thing. Does it make sense to teach in an old steam gauge thing then transition to glass after mastery (IFR ticket) of steam gauges? I've heard people say if you can fly IFR with analog stuff it's an easy transition. Is your SA better and better understanding drilled with the older way?
As for the bespoke nature of the equipment among the fleet - this is where Redbird and their VR stuff could be utilized maybe. Using VR couldn't an exact replica of a specific panel/equipment be simulated providing. a bespoke training experience for bespoke airplane equipment? This could alleviate FSI not having training programs for these.
Just thoughts, questions and such.