Yeah, not so much…. I admit I was eager and didn’t care about much, unless it was flying.
Walmart doubled in size as well, many times over, it never got any better for its employees. I aint no grumpy captain and I love aviation, I just want to get the facts straight here.
Blame it on the Economy of scale not me.
Pilots used to be like rock stars when only rich could afford to fly, now that everyone and his momma is a pilot and tickets cost $99 you be the judge. If you think pilots are about to be rock stars again good luck
jk meng, do what you want in life. if it is money you are after, you will be very happy with your MBA and whatever that comes with it![]()
I don't think that it's money he's after. I just think he's weighing the quality of life he can get based on the pay at an airline or the job he's been offered.
And he's decided, you know what, it'll be more fun to fly if it's NOT a job.
That's a very valid decision, and it's one a lot of people have made.
Don't you think you'll always wonder what it would have been like, though?
This is my concern. I've two offers on the table that both approach 100k - neither flying planes. I'm 27 and have passed on like opportunities in the past BECAUSE of the flying gig -- I'm finding it VERY hard to do it again.
I know where you're coming from Eagledriver :banghead:
Don't you think you'll always wonder what it would have been like, though?
That illustrates my point even more though.
The example is: Walmart grew, and things never got better for the employees. But did the employees try to do anything about it? If you sit back and take it from the company then of course nothing is going to get better. Then, the company sees they've got a workforce that is willing to do anything and the trend accelerates.
Only the rich could afford to fly in part because the government made the airfares and there was no competition between carriers.
De-regulation has passed, and the new aviation industry is established. Any further downward trend in working conditions is at least in part due to employees putting up with it.
That isn’t always true; you have to consider the industry and its labor force. Wal-mart requires a relatively low skill set of workers; you also have to consider the labor supply vs. demand for labor. With wal-mart there is no struggle whatsoever in finding people to fill their positions. Some will do it for less, and they know that. If the current work force caused a problem, they could simply hire someone else who will do it for the current pay scale.
Eagledriver, what kind of airplane are you wanting to get next year? With fuel prices high, Mooney's look good for their efficiency of speed vs. fuel burn. Depends on what size your kids are, though... Mooney's aren't always the roomiest choice.
The flying part really isn't that much different than punching holes in the clouds with a well equipped Cessna 182
As a former owner, definitely partner with other(s) if you can. It brings the fixed costs down more reasonable. Not a big fan of twins for personal hobby flying, nothing wrong with it per se, just that maintenance reserve, fuel expense, all doubles over a single for not that much payoff unless you really need the capabilities. 310's are very cool, though. My FBO has one, only flew in it once, right seat, but as passenger on a charter the county paid for in order to fetch a key witness that was out of town and failed to show for a high profile murder trial. Can't remember the enroute time but we made it from Evansville IN to Huntington IN (right by Fort Wayne IN) pretty quick.
But then again if you owned part of a twin building multi-time would be easy. For that money you could get a decent Pa-28 Arrow 200 also.
Yeh, but... What's fun about punching holes in the clouds in a C-182?? Not much...
Your opinion, not mine:insane: