SideStickEnergy
Active Member
I must need to venture out from the under the rock I was living under. This would be news to me. As far as I'm aware, we are still supposed to be going to FPM.Also heard Frontier is looking to use FKYs?
I must need to venture out from the under the rock I was living under. This would be news to me. As far as I'm aware, we are still supposed to be going to FPM.Also heard Frontier is looking to use FKYs?
Yep my mistake. FKYs keeps coming up in convo lately. So with the two dispatch softwares both being three letter acronyms starting with F’s, it got mistaken somewhere and I repeated it. But understood... FPM not FKYs.I must need to venture out from the under the rock I was living under. This would be news to me. As far as I'm aware, we are still supposed to be going to FPM.
Why not just use vacation time?Looks like envoy management is up to its old tricks. They screwed over some last year by not letting them test with AA. They had recurrent training and the envoy Nazis wouldn't let them out of it to test. Looks like they are doing the same this year as the manager sent out an email basically stating too bad so sad if you can't test. And don't even think about calling in sick and going to test.
That's just plain horrible to treat people like that.
Here is the thing. Most airlines run multiple recurrent classes and I am sure Envoy is no different. What would prevent the dispatcher from going to recurrent on a different day to make up the missed class on one of his/her days off? This happens all the time at my carrier.Recurrent training is specific to that dispatcher. It can't be put out for OT coverage, and it isn't as simple as just spreading a few flights around the office. Every airline I've worked for is much less tolerant of training absences than for regular shifts, you need to have a good reason and proof.
It isn't horrible for an airline to expect their employees to attend required training rather than call out to go test and interview for somewhere else....
If it's that much of a preference, there would be a seniority based flow program agreement similar to the pilots rather than relying on luck of the draw who has recurrent and who doesn't on the days in question.Here is the thing. Most airlines run multiple recurrent classes and I am sure Envoy is no different. What would prevent the dispatcher from going to recurrent on a different day to make up the missed class on one of his/her days off? This happens all the time at my carrier.
Now if Envoy found out about the hiring interviews and then scheduled recurrent on the same days deliberately to prevent the interviews that is some shady stuff. I am going to guess that AA probably didn't consult with Envoy about the recurrent schedule there before scheduling these interviews, because AA would probably hire every Envoy applicant if they could just provided they could do the job and haven't ticked off a lot of people over there.
Is this a question or a statement?They sent out interview offer today
He fit right in at placeThey sent out interview offer today
For what day??They sent out interview offer today
Nay on externalHas anyone from Envoy or Externals heard anything yet?
We’d more likely have a class of all Envoy, that’s the majority of our new hires. Then a second class of externals with a small handful of internals. But nothing set in stone.I wonder if they are doing a class with internals and then a class with Envoy and Externals
So pretty much envoy and other airlines dx take priority than internalsWe’d more likely have a class of all Envoy, that’s the majority of our new hires. Then a second class of externals with a small handful of internals. But nothing set in stone.
We always offer interviews to internals first. So if you’re external keep your eyes open. They’re still coming.