I think it adds training time since there are more systems to learn. Just like time to solo tends to take longer if you train at a busy Class D as opposed to a rural nontowered field. Beyond that I think there is no long-term difference.Compare the panel shown above with a close approximation of the panel I soloed behind (Cessna 140). Do you think the techno stuff enhances or detracts from primary instruction? Or does it matter at all?
this has been in the works for a while, not like it’s a new thing that’s sidetracking the DOT.I am genuinely asking this, and not trying to be snarky.
How much of a market is the sport pilot's license? I never did any training as a CFI towards a sport license for anyone, and I don't hear about it much. I see LSAs fly, and I am sure this will be great, but in the realm of processing power of the FAA, is this what is so pressing and needed that it really needed to be the first major focus of the new transportation secretary?
Wow. I gave up on pursuing flying partly because I take duloxetine and pregabalin for neuropathy and those meds are disqualifying. They aren't impairing and I've been on them for years. I would jump at the chance to be able to fly.I read you only need a drivers license and you can't fly if you have a medical issue that will effect your ability to safely operate an LSA.
If I ever own an airplane again it will have the minimum VFR stuff and an iPad with ForeFlight. And I’ll be living somewhere where I can buzz around at 500’ and if the engine goes kaboom, flare when the crops are tickling the mains. I’ve spent too much time seeing all the • that goes sideways in a GA plane to have any interest in flying one IFR again, especially if it’s on my dime.The simpler the panel the better. They can't test you on things you don't have. GPS navigators can be pretty complex if you get into the weeds, which DPE's can do.
I have a Cherokee out of WN26, Palouse, WA. Don't fly at night. Engine goes boom and I land in a wheat field. I don't fly in the mountains and I don't fly over cities. This is what flying big jets for years does to you.
I don't believe that's true. This sounds like basic med. If you have a reference to prove otherwise I'm all ears. I quoted the FAA reference at MOSAIC's website. I must admit it's fairly vague. I could see OKC pushing back and perhaps you are correct. Would love to see a reference posted within the last couple days.You cannot fly LSA if you have applied for an FAA medical and it was denied or deferred. If you have not applied for one, all you need is a driver's license.
The eyes work better than ears hereI don't believe that's true. This sounds like basic med. If you have a reference to prove otherwise I'm all ears.
Hmmm. I had one deferred for ADHD back in 2010, did the requisite testing and had the medical certificate issued. Class II, I believe. I never applied for a renewal.You cannot fly LSA if you have applied for an FAA medical and it was denied or deferred. If you have not applied for one, all you need is a driver's license.
So long as you were ultimately found eligible, and it was not revoked (or an associated SI withdrawn), you are eligible.Hmmm. I had one deferred for ADHD back in 2010, did the requisite testing and had the medical certificate issued. Class II, I believe. I never applied for a renewal.
this has been in the works for a while, not like it’s a new thing that’s sidetracking the DOT.
The market is mainly just people who know they can’t qualify for a medical, but choose to “self certify” and fly anyways.I am genuinely asking this, and not trying to be snarky.
How much of a market is the sport pilot's license? I never did any training as a CFI towards a sport license for anyone, and I don't hear about it much. I see LSAs fly, and I am sure this will be great, but in the realm of processing power of the FAA, is this what is so pressing and needed that it really needed to be the first major focus of the new transportation secretary?
I think that's true for the private/commercial pilots who accept the limitations of sport privilege. But modern LSAs are also excellent trainers. I would guess that flight schools that specialize in LSAs have more private pilot candidates than sport pilot candidates.The market is mainly just people who know they can’t qualify for a medical, but choose to “self certify” and fly anyways.
It's only one example, but I just checked with someone I know who has been operating flight schools that primarily use LSAs. They never marketed themselves as "sport pilot" schools and 99% of their students have been private pilot candidates.I think that's true for the private/commercial pilots who accept the limitations of sport privilege. But modern LSAs are also excellent trainers. I would guess that flight schools that specialize in LSAs have more private pilot candidates than sport pilot candidates.
You cannot fly LSA if you have applied for an FAA medical and it was denied or deferred. If you have not applied for one, all you need is a driver's license.
found your ideal LSAIt doesn't go far enough. Certification is unconstitutional, taxation is theft.
found your ideal LSA