tcco94
Future GTA VI Pilot
Because our journalism is garbage
Frontier will get some bad press for this
- Thread starter fholbert
- Start date
mightynimbus
Well-Known Member
This guy made it easy on PD, the dog was microchipped.
Video shows man throw dog over razor-wire fence in Southern California
Animal service officials in Southern California are looking for a man who recently threw a dog over a razor-wire fence and abandoned the animal.www.dailymail.co.uk
look like he stuck the landing
Sheesh, now we have others using DailyMail as a source?This guy made it easy on PD, the dog was microchipped.
Video shows man throw dog over razor-wire fence in Southern California
Animal service officials in Southern California are looking for a man who recently threw a dog over a razor-wire fence and abandoned the animal.
Might just go back to my cave...
fholbert
Mod's - Please don't edit my posts!
That story was wide spread on local news last week.
Doesn't negate my point. At all.
Edit to add:
Pretty sure you use NewsNation a lot - a much, much, much better source:
ASpilot2be
Qbicle seat warmer
Correction, people are garbage.
Cherokee_Cruiser
Bronteroc
Come on. It *happened* and yet again DM was accurate about the subject posted.
Do you understand the difference between "source" and "content"?
Even a blind squirrel...
Cherokee_Cruiser
Bronteroc
Some, not all, brown people are terrorists.
Some, not all, DM news articles have biased/slanted content.
See how being dismissive and saying “all” is bad is not a good thing?
News sources are not people, and do not deserve the same consideration. No comparison.Some, not all, brown people are terrorists.
Some, not all, DM news articles have biased/slanted content.
See how being dismissive and saying “all” is bad is not a good thing?
ETA:
Also, again, I'm not railing against biased sources (although it is important to understand those biases), but against sources that do not reliably report factually. Bias can be taken into account, but if you are told, and believe, false information than you are intellectually screwed.
knot4u
Repeat Offender
That seems fair, but you refuse to consider any news source that leans right as trustworthy. How many people and police officers died at the Capitol on J6?
False statement. Completely.
Every source that I call out as unreliable is because outside resources have deemed them such, NOT because they're right-leaning.
I find your persistence in blatant misrepresentation of other's position as, well, dishonest at heart. Not a good look.
As evidence to belie your contention, I have often said that WSJ, among others, are good sources. I care about their reliability, not their bias, and I have been completely consistent in that stance.
See item #2:
Definition of NON SEQUITUR
a statement (such as a response) that does not follow logically from or is not clearly related to anything previously said… See the full definition
www.merriam-webster.com
Cherokee_Cruiser
Bronteroc
How would you know the bias checking website itself isn’t biased?
NovemberEcho
Dergs favorite member
The world needs fewer cats. Behind humans, the house cat is responsible for more extinctions than any other animal. They decimate local ecosystems when introduced.
1. I've already said that I care about Factual Reporting, i.e. Reliability, and not left or right leaning bias.
2. If you want to learn about media rating sites, do what I did and read a little bit on the subject.
Best News Source Rating Sites
For those who think it's easier to annoy you than to Google 'Best news source rating sites' themselves.
3. The site I often quote has plenty of right-leaning sources that get good ratings for Factual Reporting. Here's a short list that I grabbed of reasonably well-known right-leaning sources that are rated High for Factual Reporting, and I'd bet that there are literally hundreds more:
Boston Herald - Bias and Credibility
RIGHT-CENTER BIAS These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words
mediabiasfactcheck.com
Cato Institute - Bias and Credibility
RIGHT-CENTER BIAS These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words
mediabiasfactcheck.com
Chicago Tribune - Bias and Credibility
RIGHT-CENTER BIAS These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words
mediabiasfactcheck.com
The Detroit News - Bias and Credibility
RIGHT-CENTER BIAS These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words
mediabiasfactcheck.com
Fortune Magazine - Bias and Credibility
RIGHT-CENTER BIAS These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words
mediabiasfactcheck.com
Grand Rapids Press - Bias and Credibility
RIGHT-CENTER BIAS These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words
mediabiasfactcheck.com
The Globe and Mail - Bias and Credibility
RIGHT-CENTER BIAS These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words
mediabiasfactcheck.com
The Jerusalem Report - Bias and Credibility
RIGHT-CENTER BIAS These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words
mediabiasfactcheck.com
Last edited:
knot4u
Repeat Offender
I think you're breathing too much of your own air and you like it. I said your opinion carries no weight, in other words you lack gravitas, the very thing you want and believe you have. To be honest it's sad.False statement. Completely.
Every source that I call out as unreliable is because outside resources have deemed them such, NOT because they're right-leaning.
I find your persistence in blatant misrepresentation of other's position as, well, dishonest at heart. Not a good look.
As evidence to belie your contention, I have often said that WSJ, among others, are good sources. I care about their reliability, not their bias, and I have been completely consistent in that stance.
View attachment 68935
See item #2:
Definition of NON SEQUITUR
a statement (such as a response) that does not follow logically from or is not clearly related to anything previously said… See the full definition
Cherokee_Cruiser
Bronteroc
I mean. You could use that logic and say the world needs fewer humans. And you wouldn’t be wrong.
Well, that's one way to concede the discussion I guess. *shrug*
knot4u
Repeat Offender
I haven't conceded. I'll continue to point out your bias at every opportunity.