Are you able to elaborate??
This is what I know,
1. The NK dispatch contract was not written with the possibility of a two domicile OCC in mind.
2. The contract does not say that company and DX need to agree on moving, only on the conditions of the move (expenses etc).
3. The initial TA included moving expenses as well as numerous changes to work rules to make the contract work with two domiciles.
4. The initial TA was voted down with almost 100% group participation. While compensation was one part of the decision, the work rule changes were the major factor and weakened several parts of the current contract.
5. Following the initial failed TA, the company quickly doubled their compensation offer, which is no more or less than what is being offered to the non CBA groups. The two parties returned to the table until the company stopped communication entirely. What I heard is they were completely unwilling to negotiate on the parts of the TA that made it fail in the first place (work rules).
6. While possibly unrelated, a probationary dispatcher was asked by a member of management how they voted on the initial TA. The dispatcher was terminated days later with no cause given, under the terms of probationary employment.
7. Even after ceasing communication with union representatives toward a new TA, the company continues full steam ahead toward preparing the MCO OCC, hence the complaint and suit for an injunction to stop until the company returns to negotiations.