Single pilot 797

31 and positive that I will not be a pilot forever, I'm in the process of deciding how to gracefully replace my pilot income and diversify. Airbus says they can do it today, and I believe them.
 
Boeing said the Max was good to go....soooo.....

The irony of companies that can't get an AOA indicator right talking about pilotless planes is not lost on me. That said irony is informed by logic, and the last 5 years of geopolitics, extreme capitalism and technology has informed me that logic has no place in the human experience as we move "forward" or sideways or backwards toward feudalism or whatever we're headed toward.

Buy rental property. Make your backup a passive income stream. Although I’d say you’re unlikely to lose your career due to automation during your lifetime.

That's one of the plans, that said I think people in their 30s will absolutely be affected.
 
The irony of companies that can't get an AOA indicator right talking about pilotless planes is not lost on me.
Sadly the fact is that the pilots didn't exactly improve the situation in this previous two crashes.

I wonder if there were any other instances where the pilots fixed the issue themselves. I hevent read up on this enough to know.
 
Sadly the fact is that the pilots didn't exactly improve the situation in this previous two crashes.

I wonder if there were any other instances where the pilots fixed the issue themselves. I hevent read up on this enough to know.

They were put in a lose lose situation, they weren't able manually trim fast enough to overcome where the system set the trim. They reconnected in a last ditch effort to save. The pilots are absolved as far as I'm concerned.
 
Suppose single pilot 797 is better than no pilot airbus. I’m 35 and doubt I’ll finish my career actually inside an airplane but that’s just me. More reason to diversify your income ;)


31 and positive that I will not be a pilot forever, I'm in the process of deciding how to gracefully replace my pilot income and diversify. Airbus says they can do it today, and I believe them.

JCers: The 737 is a dinosaur from ancient history
Also JCers: New tech is going to take away our jobs

Almost 60 years since the dawn of the 737 there are still FEs. The 737, imo, was the beginning of the end for FEs, but it has taken more than 60 years to "kill them off."

If you are 30 now, and you decide to go to a major, twenty years from now you should have enough seniority that if single pilot airliners start to encroach on your work, you will be upstream of the pain. And twenty years is wildly optimistic. Last time it took nearly a half a century.

I, too, am in my 30s, and a late starter in aviation. I'm not remotely worried about automation ruining my career path.
 
JCers: The 737 is a dinosaur from ancient history
Also JCers: New tech is going to take away our jobs

Almost 60 years since the dawn of the 737 there are still FEs. The 737, imo, was the beginning of the end for FEs, but it has taken more than 60 years to "kill them off."

If you are 30 now, and you decide to go to a major, twenty years from now you should have enough seniority that if single pilot airliners start to encroach on your work, you will be upstream of the pain. And twenty years is wildly optimistic. Last time it took nearly a half a century.

I, too, am in my 30s, and a late starter in aviation. I'm not remotely worried about automation ruining my career path.

How many as a percentage in comparison to the "Glory days?"

Barely any. You've got Lynden in the C130, Everts in the DC6, and a few broke-dick jet operators and a smattering here and there.

Meanwhile navigators are totally dead as a species. There's not even a way to get the certificate any more.

Automation is coming, the second it is cheaper to remove a pilot than install a piece of equipment the companies will make it happen. They'd be dumb not to.
 
the second (plus about 20-40 years for design, certification, construction, testing, and distribution) it is cheaper to remove a pilot than install a piece of equipment the companies will make it happen.

FIFY.

Sure we could see work started soon, but I am not concerned about it hurting me in the 30 years I have left, because it's just a gradual process, and we are in the first phases. My point about FEs is that they died out slowly over more than half a century. The biggest question is going to be when these airliners start to roll out of the assembly line, what are new pilots to do then? Most of us are way beyond that point now.

Let's imagine I'm completely wrong and jobs start getting serious chipped away 10 years from now. I can still do so much with the amount of money I can make in ten good years at a major that I'm still not worried about it.
 
How many as a percentage in comparison to the "Glory days?"

Barely any. You've got Lynden in the C130, Everts in the DC6, and a few broke-dick jet operators and a smattering here and there.

Meanwhile navigators are totally dead as a species. There's not even a way to get the certificate any more.

Automation is coming, the second it is cheaper to remove a pilot than install a piece of equipment the companies will make it happen. They'd be dumb not to.

I have a lot of C-130 Nav buddies that would like to have some words with you. Kidding of course.
 
I wonder if there were any other instances where the pilots fixed the issue themselves. I hevent read up on this enough to know.
We generally don't get to hear about a lot of near misses, because the standard response to "maybe we should file an ASAP" is often "well but we didn't break any rules."
 
We generally don't get to hear about a lot of near misses, because the standard response to "maybe we should file an ASAP" is often "well but we didn't break any rules."
Well that and the ASAP program is a black hole. You'd never see public statistics of things like that come out of it. And despite all evidence to the contrary, the FAA will say - nope haven't seen any reports on that while sitting on 500 reports of it happening.
 
Well that and the ASAP program is a black hole. You'd never see public statistics of things like that come out of it. And despite all evidence to the contrary, the FAA will say - nope haven't seen any reports on that while sitting on 500 reports of it happening.
Yeah.

So you're left with sensational public disclosures (which don't generally work), kicking it up the chain of command (which might work, but beware), or simply living with it.
 
I don’t understand this argument about Flight Engineers. A FE is basically just a human computer doing routine tasks. Of course they were removed, that’s something computers can perform very easily, and have done so for several decades.

Removing the 2nd pilot is a MUCH bigger deal. First of all, they’re a pilot, not a FE. Second, modern training, TEM techniques, and just the plain old “hey, does this look right to you?” are not concepts that can easily be replaced by a computer. All of the talk about AI really hasn’t come anywhere close to what a human can do with abstract concepts and problem solving.

Not sure why were even listening to what a regional airline dispatcher thinks about this. No offense, you guys have an important job. But you have absolutely no idea what I’m dealing with on a 4 day trip.
 
I admit I will likely be submitting less ASAPs in the future due to recent stuff I learned at my airline. ASAP isn't as clean as it sounds.

@Autothrust Blue Maurus and I both work at the same company and he is spot on, I can't imagine working for a set of more untrustworthy flight safety managers than our current shop, the stuff I've learned in the last 18 months about so many of the processes at our shop is frankly horrifying, and the erosion of trust on the side of the average line pilot is warranted.
 
Back
Top