Good Captains

I flew with a guy once on a trip through Denver and every step down fix where you had to be between altitudes he would say, oh we barely made that fix. I just kept saying "yeah." But yeah, we did make it. It's pretty simple in the CRJ have the direct intercept page up and as long as your vertical speed is higher than what's on the page you're fine. Then when he was PF he'd get to the bottom altitudes and level off at each one, very efficient and comfortable for passengers
 
Sometimes I'm just putting my hand there because I know it needs to be there next.

It's not a commentary on your technique. I just want to be ready for it.


Some of you are really sensitive [emoji14]

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

This. I don't understand why people are getting so sensitive about it. Seems like they're insecure. On most planes, the FO's left hand almost naturally falls to the flap lever.
 
I flew with a guy once on a trip through Denver and every step down fix where you had to be between altitudes he would say, oh we barely made that fix. I just kept saying "yeah." But yeah, we did make it. It's pretty simple in the CRJ have the direct intercept page up and as long as your vertical speed is higher than what's on the page you're fine. Then when he was PF he'd get to the bottom altitudes and level off at each one, very efficient and comfortable for passengers

As an FO I...HATED...THIS. Why not attempt to make a constant rate of descent using what the COMPUTERS are telling you. I’d look ahead and see that we only need to do 1000’ or less descent rate and they’re doing 2500’ or more. *Super efficient*
 
You mean like FOs who get bent out of shape by the captain resting their hands near the yoke? :stir:

There's a difference between passively resting a hand near a control that I'll be activating, and actively shadowing the yoke while someone else is flying.
 
Holy crap does this thread make me appreciate flying by myself.

It sounds like a lot of this happens at the regional level. Not saying exclusively, and a small sample size, but I've never witnessed these shenanigans at the legacy level.
 
It sounds like a lot of this happens at the regional level. Not saying exclusively, and a small sample size, but I've never witnessed these shenanigans at the legacy level.
Probably true, I personally didn't see it at the regionals but I was only there for a couple years. It's the nitpicking over technique that's just amazing. Do your job, go home, cash check. Simple.
 
It's FAR more prevalent at the regionals. I've had a couple micromanaging-micromanagers at mainline, and a couple dingleberries, but it's few and far between.

Confession, if I'm doing the Garfield on the window thing looking outside on approach, I'll put my hand on the flap handle so I don't have to grope for it when they inevitably call for it.
 
I did have one FO ask me (in general and me personally) why captains kept their hand on the side stick when he was PF.

I personally don't keep my hand on the side stick with the intention of overriding the other pilot. I do use the PTT on the side stick. Since the side sticks don't move together I didn't think it was a problem.

I did say that when I was going through OE I was surprised to hear from all the check airmen I was flying with that I was expected to keep my feet on the rudder pedals to be ready to take over from the FO in case I needed to for takeoff and landing. Really? After I was done with training and hit the line and tried shadowing the rudder pedals a few times I decided I didn't like it so I stopped doing it. I think if I really need to take control it would just be easier to say go around than mash that red button on the side stick and say I have control when we're so close to the ground.
 
I would much rather the other pilot say "go around" than try to save the day at 50 feet if he thinks things are going bad on my approach.

The company would rather that too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top