thank youAn axial fan moves the air along the axis of the engine (shaft) like a common oscillating fan. A centrifugal turbine forces the air in a direction 90 degrees from the axis of the engine.
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
that would definitely help, thanks! I just started reading the turbine pilots manual and of course one interview question I ran into was, "what is the difference between axial fan and centrifugal fan" so I just went with the word fan like it asked.Try replacing the word "fan" with "compressor" and you'll have a lot more Google luck. Like this:
https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/compress.html
Axials are easier to daisy chain together in X amount of space and are better at relatively lower RPMs, whereas centrifugals take more space and are better at higher RPMs (such as Garrets which idle over 70%).
Modern large turbofans tend to be axial (think 737/Airbus), some turboprops are purely centrifugal (Garrets), but a lot of engines use a combo of both types to provide more efficient power across the entire RPM range (such as the PT6 and many Pratt jets).
Pt6a is a centrifugal (pronouce it few-gul), which attaches to 1900, which is the best airplane ever.that would definitely help, thanks! I just started reading the turbine pilots manual and of course one interview question I ran into was, "what is the difference between axial fan and centrifugal fan" so I just went with the word fan like it asked. Hopefully this will all stick soon!
Nah mang PT6 has more axial compressors than centrifugal. The TPE331 has 2 centrifugal compressors alone.Pt6a is a centrifugal (pronouce it few-gul), which attaches to 1900, which is the best airplane ever.
Axial flows are little wuzzy girls.
Okay I'll make sure to add that when asked what my thoughts are of an axial flowPt6a is a centrifugal (pronouce it few-gul), which attaches to 1900, which is the best airplane ever.
Axial flows are little wuzzy girls.
Sure. But let's weigh those mincy little bastards on one scale, and slap down that manly centrifugal bastard on the other scale and see what tips where.Nah mang PT6 has more axial compressors than centrifugal. The TPE331 has 2 centrifugal compressors alone.
That's why TPE331 is life.Sure. But let's weigh those mincy little bastards on one scale, and slap down that manly centrifugal bastard on the other scale and see what tips where.
Edit: And they do nothing btw. The just spin there at 10,000 rpm looking stupid and lost and saying, "here take this air, do something with it! Im stupid!"
The PT-6 is the tricycle of turbo-props. Real men ride bikesThat's why TPE331 is life.
Even more manly men buy a semi-production Rolls-Royce/Allison powered motorcycle:The PT-6 is the tricycle of turbo-props. Real men ride bikes![]()
"…and the strangest thing is the complete lack of vibration. You hear the turbine but don't feel the turbine, except for the fact that it's trying to smoothly compress all your vertebrae into one dense donut."
I seem to recall a story Jay Leno told of riding his and being crowded at a light by a guy in a BMW(??). I believe he said the fun part was watching the guys bumper melt from his exhaust.Even more manly men buy a semi-production Rolls-Royce/Allison powered motorcycle:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MTT_Turbine_Superbike
Pt6a is a centrifugal (pronouce it few-gul), which attaches to 1900, which is the best airplane ever.
Axial flows are little wuzzy girls.
Turbojets with a centrifugal compress/turbine are really good at turning air into noise with some thrust to boot.
It's a well known fact that old school turbine noise grows man-hair. It's like comparing Sean Connery to Daniel Craig.That's the truth. Man are they loud!
Centrifugal compressors: because why use 4 rows of dainty, perfectly profiled individual blades when one big honking milled chunk of titanium billet will do the job?It's a well known fact that old school turbine noise grows man-hair. It's like comparing Sean Connery to Daniel Craig.