Stone Cold
Well-Known Member
Ah ok. Carry on...Eeet whas an un joooooke, brah.
Reference my reply to what's his screen name
Ah ok. Carry on...Eeet whas an un joooooke, brah.
Reference my reply to what's his screen name
It's from FR24, ADSB capture data I believeVector, what is that data you posted?
The Tartarstan crash makes no sense, just push the nose down and fly it straight into the ground....
Yes it does for two reasons. The 737 has a really neat feature: If you are doing an approach with only one autopilot engaged and press TO/GA it disconnects. If you push the thrust levers up the aircraft pitches up a lot, especially when you think the autopilot is engaged and are not doing anything to counter that pitch up. Then there is somatogravic illusion which was a major cause of the Gulf Air 072 crash.
Typhoonpilot
Not knowing the 737, does it normally try to fly coupled approaches with only 1 autopilot? Does the pilot have to select all of them? The 747 is very much not that way.Yes it does for two reasons. The 737 has a really neat feature: If you are doing an approach with only one autopilot engaged and press TO/GA it disconnects. If you push the thrust levers up the aircraft pitches up a lot, especially when you think the autopilot is engaged and are not doing anything to counter that pitch up. Then there is somatogravic illusion which was a major cause of the Gulf Air 072 crash.
Typhoonpilot
Like I said, FTFA. Fly The F'in Airplane. Don't let it fly you.
Yes it does for two reasons. The 737 has a really neat feature: If you are doing an approach with only one autopilot engaged and press TO/GA it disconnects. If you push the thrust levers up the aircraft pitches up a lot, especially when you think the autopilot is engaged and are not doing anything to counter that pitch up. Then there is somatogravic illusion which was a major cause of the Gulf Air 072 crash.
Typhoonpilot
ORLY?
I don't remember my time on the -200, but that seems to be an idiotic design.
Yep!
Yep!
Yep!
Yep!
That seems kind of... silly. I get it in an aircraft without autothrottles, but why in the name of the flying spaghetti monster woud triggering TOGA in a fully automated aircraft disconnect the autopilot if it was on?
Although, like Mike said, fly the damn plane.
That seems kind of... silly. I get it in an aircraft without autothrottles, but why in the name of the flying spaghetti monster woud triggering TOGA in a fully automated aircraft disconnect the autopilot if it was on?
Although, like Mike said, fly the damn plane.
It's the 737NG... because Boeing stopped trying.
Ex colleague told me: Layovers in Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Tanzania, Czech Republic. If you don't bid for them between 0 and 1 per month, depends on seniority. Flying hours between 85 - 95, deadhead doesn't count, so if you have 85 block hours and let's say 3 deadheads you're above 100 hours. It seems like they have a high attrition rate, nearly 10%. Shortage seems to be on the left seat. From what I heard, the rosters are the big issue.I wonder how the safety culture is at FlyDubai. Don't they have a lot of 'day trips', few overnights?
Yes it does for two reasons. The 737 has a really neat feature: If you are doing an approach with only one autopilot engaged and press TO/GA it disconnects. If you push the thrust levers up the aircraft pitches up a lot, especially when you think the autopilot is engaged and are not doing anything to counter that pitch up. Then there is somatogravic illusion which was a major cause of the Gulf Air 072 crash.
Typhoonpilot
Like I said, FTFA. Fly The F'in Airplane. Don't let it fly you.
Agree with all you said.
I have no idea why Boeing made it that way.
Well to be fair in their quest for modernity Airbus seems to have made their share of missteps.It's the 737NG... because Boeing stopped trying.