Most unmanned systems have double redundancy in their hardware. That's not counting any lost comms logic and the associated backup plans. Beyond that, isn't that what the single meatbag on board would be for?How many of those have triple redundancy to operate every system? Cause that's what it's gonna take.
The general public already freak out if their pilot looks under 40, what will they do if they have no pilot, or just one pilot that is young looking?
They'll freak out the same way they do on a subway train or elevator. Mechanics of the operation aside we've already made the psychological leap to trust our lives to robots.
Skynet, Cylons, and Hal are all figments of the imagination. The amount of times you trust your life to a machine per day would blow your mind. Stop and think about each move you make.
I'll bet if your heart surgeon said the only way to save your life was to undergo a procedure by an augmented robot (which happens btw) you'd lay down on the table and start thumping a vein.
have been better?New cockpit seat design with center hole, holds a walmart bag under it. Self emptying at next station.
This is going to happen, and sooner rather than later..... This isn't actually a bad thing.
I'll be joining the Fraternal Order of Disruptors here in San Francisco and work on agile projects in a DevOps environment (whatever that means), and buy my own airplane for purposes of getting around, before getting on an unmanned aircraft.It amazes me that there are actually pilots championing the outsourcing of their livelihoods. SMH. I'm sure it's gonna happen eventually. However, until there is autonomous driving cars in widespread, mandatory use, you won't see airplanes doing it. Thank God I only got 15 more years left. After that, you won't catch me on a commercial flight ever.
@Richman I hear the ejecta blankets are lovely this time of year.
No doubt.
We, as a civilization, have gotten really good at fussy, little things.
BIG science & engineering, not so much.
Unfortunately, it's not like the tech levels in the Traveller role playing game where TL8 covers both chemical rockets and flitting around the solar system on fusion drive. The Devil's in the details.
Richman
Sarcasm Ave is a two way street.You do know what this means, :stir: right? Or would thishave been better?
I just happen to be a credentialed manned and unmanned pilot so I guess I'm not too worried about being out of a job.
I'm not sure I've ever heard "old Lear" and "simplicity" in the same sentence.I flew unmanned stuff to feed my family. Now I've gone off the grid and fly an old Lear...and love it's simplicity.![]()
Yep, I used to work on a Lear 25 with the squat switches on the lower torque armsI'm not sure I've ever heard "old Lear" and "simplicity" in the same sentence.That fuel system alone. Plus as planes (especially the 20 series) went down the assembly line, Bill Lear would just move stuff. Some thing that was in the nose cone on one serial number, is in the aft avionics bay on another. And 3-4 serial numbers later, it moved back. No drawings, nothing. @knot4u knows what I'm talking about
![]()
. I think it was S/N 007, apparently it was a test bed for the 35. All of the wiring diagrams for the 25 would be effective for S/N 001-006 and 008 and subsequent. Probably not a good candidate for an automation retrofit.Heck I even heard actors being replaced. It will be digital avatars in the future. Apparently this was Marlon Brando's prediction in the 90s!