I like that "Don't mistake for MSP".They look..........uh....
I hate NOS charts. Those make me want to punch a puppy.
View attachment 31164
Not sure what you mean by "... Have the charts redraw themselves", but Foreflight does everything else you mentioned.
I think by "redraw themselves" he means that as you zoom in and out, important information that you are looking for like MORAs will disappear and appear randomly at different zoom levels, so you're never sure if you're getting the whole picture. That app is basically unusable for enroute charts (and barely usable for approach charts).
ForeFlight and WingX simply use a scanned in image of a sectional or low/high enroute chart, while JeppFD programmatically draws the map.
.
Yeah as I was looking at that thing my left eye starting to twitch trying to think about how to brief that thing.And briefing from a LIDO plate? Terrible. I used them for a year at 9E.
Huh. Never seen a lido chart before. Pretty slick.
Actually this is no longer true, Foreflight has all digitital charts now and will rescale to TAC charts as you zoom in as well.
Which I find to be the thing that slows down JeppFD. All of that enroute chart rendering takes a ton of memory. I'd rather look at the scanned chart than some wierd thing that you can turn parts on and off. Where's that intersection? Oh yeah I turned "intersections" off accidentally. If I want to look at a sectional on ForeFlight, I know I'm looking at a sectional, not their version of a sectional.Correct, ForeFlight now uses aeronautical raster charts (a digital image of an FAA VFR Chart). These are great and much more crisp than the former scanned charts. But these still differ from the JeppFD vector-based maps, which are compiled by the software on the fly--there is no underlying base imagery file.
Which I find to be the thing that slows down JeppFD. All of that enroute chart rendering takes a ton of memory. I'd rather look at the scanned chart than some wierd thing that you can turn parts on and off. Where's that intersection? Oh yeah I turned "intersections" off accidentally. If I want to look at a sectional on ForeFlight, I know I'm looking at a sectional, not their version of a sectional.
Admittedly, I have little to no experience with the G1000. As far as I know those moving maps aren't trying to replicate an existing chart. They display airspace/airways etc but if you want to look at a high altitude/sectional that's another screen. The JeppFD is supposed to be replicating and existing chart, high and low altitude, but they add all those features you don't need. In ForeFlight you can choose to overlay certain info on a regular chart, like terrain awareness. The chart it self always stays the same though.It's no different than flying with a G1000 or any TAA with a moving map using this same technology. That's certainly not for everyone, especially without good training on proper use.
Even if you are looking at a paper Jepp chart it is still their "version" of the chart as they draw it from the TERPS geodata.Which I find to be the thing that slows down JeppFD. All of that enroute chart rendering takes a ton of memory. I'd rather look at t he scanned chart than some wierd thing that you can turn parts on and off. Where's that intersection? Oh yeah I turned "intersections" off accidentally. If I want to look at a sectional on ForeFlight, I know I'm looking at a sectional, not their version of a sectional.
I think I explained it wrong. A paper chart is a paper chart. You can't turn airspace, airways, nav aids and airports off. On JeppFD you can "declutter" all of those. It's a feature that takes a ton of memory and is just about unnecessary. I'd rather just look at the paper version but on my iPad, just like the approach plates.Even if you are looking at a paper Jepp chart it is still their "version" of the chart as they draw it from the TERPS geodata.
When Jepp electronic charts first came out the file size was MASSIVE because they just scanned the paper charts and supplied them as a bitmap image, albeit a high quality bitmap image... it wasn't until later that they started using .eps vector files, or whatever format they use, maybe .svg...