Delta off the Runway - LGA

I'm sure they've got the finest mechanics on it.
original.jpg



FIF BOTH OF YOU COLLEGE BOYS!

2q8mu6a.jpg
 
Been to DFW in a while? World's largest VFR only airport. Their 123 rule is: 1 cloud, within 200 miles, 3 hours of flow. Slow to 210 knots 100 miles out? You guys aren't THAT busy. ORD would have me doing 300 for another 50 miles...
I've never really understood the hate torwards DFW. For an airspace and airport that big, it's really simple and easygoing to get in and get out. Sure, they aren't as aggressive as Chicago, but there is no need to be. The airport has a layout that doesn't create a cluster****, so why push the boundaries?
 
I've never really understood the hate torwards DFW. For an airspace and airport that big, it's really simple and easygoing to get in and get out. Sure, they aren't as aggressive as Chicago, but there is no need to be. The airport has a layout that doesn't create a cluster****, so why push the boundaries?
Top altitude is 10, any questions?
 
Whelp.........this beats any pax trying to drag their baggage/belongings with them on down the slide or stopping/standing next to the plane to take selfies. This idiot actually tried to use the lav during the damn evac. Listen at the 2:40 mark.

http://7online.com/news/laguardia-f...d-faellaci-talks-about-plane-accident/545970/

From another interview he did:

"After the plane stopped, Mr. Faellaci said, the pilot came into the cabin to give deplaning instructions.

“I had to go to the bathroom,” Mr. Faellaci said, “so I stood up and said, ‘Excuse me, sir, could I use the restroom?”

His request was declined."

Who needs evac instructions, I gotta go go. Good grief. Not only did he think that the crew was going to let him use the lav at at such moment, but he thinks they were also going to stand around and wait for him, apparently. Then he tells the story to several news outlets. lol
 
Last edited:
I really with we could measure braking action from the anti-skid and accelerometers and automatically uplink that data to a central database. Then we'd have usable, scientific, up-to-date information about actual conditions than simple subjective observations.
I've thought about the same thing lately with ride reoprts. One mans "light to mod chop" is another's "holy hell we need lower now". It'd be simple, every airplane gets a box full of accelerometers and other nerd stuff. It would be calibrated to each airframe to take into account things like wing loading. It gets downloaded as part of the ADS-B data and poof, we all know what the rides are like. We could even have a fancy chart that'd show realtime data. Maybe I'm a dreamer.
 
I've thought about the same thing lately with ride reoprts. One mans "light to mod chop" is another's "holy hell we need lower now". It'd be simple, every airplane gets a box full of accelerometers and other nerd stuff. It would be calibrated to each airframe to take into account things like wing loading. It gets downloaded as part of the ADS-B data and poof, we all know what the rides are like. We could even have a fancy chart that'd show realtime data. Maybe I'm a dreamer.
I always thought the AIM definitions were pretty straightforward.
 
I always thought the AIM definitions were pretty straightforward.
They are. It's just people have their own way of describing it (which is well outside of the AIM definitions). If we're going to put all this uplink/downlink tech in transport airplanes, why not include some thing like that? Attach a numerical value to it, some thing every one can see. Image all the airplanes flying across the country and you can get real time ride data from each one. ATC wouldn't have to paint a broad picture of what the rides are like. They could say with certainty FL350 is crap, FL330 is smooooooth sailing. To be honest, I'm just tired of hearing all the ride report requests while I'm sitting at FL450 drinking my Dr. Pepper. I'm not do bothered with such nonsense. :)
 
I've thought about the same thing lately with ride reoprts. One mans "light to mod chop" is another's "holy hell we need lower now". It'd be simple, every airplane gets a box full of accelerometers and other nerd stuff. It would be calibrated to each airframe to take into account things like wing loading. It gets downloaded as part of the ADS-B data and poof, we all know what the rides are like. We could even have a fancy chart that'd show realtime data. Maybe I'm a dreamer.

This would be amazing.
 
So, why haven't we heard about this? It's been installed since 2004. Is there a place where I can find a ride report chart? Or is it part of the magical Alaska next gen stuff that @ASpilot2be speaks of? Serious question, not trying to be a smart ass.
There are quite a few different airlines equipped with TAMDAR, its not just Alaska. I seem to recall Horizon, and I think TSA do as well. To be honest I am not sure who collects all the data.
 
Back
Top