Luigi
Well-Known Member
Yes. And no.
Sounds like you missed a great opportunity to turn your above average flying skills into an above average FO paycheck.
Yes. And no.
Sounds like you missed a great opportunity to turn your above average flying skills into an above average FO paycheck.
PLEASE tell me you're not referring to 3701.....I think you'd need to see what happened to understand my comment. There was a crew who stalled high in the flight levels who only marginally increased power, and pulled right back into the shaker multiple times. This was before the FAA advocated also reducing the AOA. What bothers me most about this incident was neither pilot EVER went full power.
PLEASE tell me you're not referring to 3701.....
It happens. I've been asked to baby sit a captain before.
Meh, I wouldn't call 4,000 hours A LOT. I'd call it enough for most types of operations. You can accumulate 4,000 hours pretty quickly, depending on what you do for a living.
But 4,000 hours with gaping holes in fundamentals? That's a problem, because those fundamental problems have been reinforced for 4,000 hours.
I was trying to figure out the best way to respond to that, and I think you've said it best here. We've all flown with those 4000+ hour types that just leave you scratching your head...
Me too, about three times in my career.
My answer is always "I am not an evaluator"
I'd just as soon not be told about someone's shortcomings ahead of time. Otherwise you might be looking for something that isn't there.
Amen. I've been warned about people who were, eh, let's say maybe a bit eccentric, but fine...more than once. Your opinions are your own, and you're entitled to them. But don't expect me to acquire them simply by the virtue of your say-so. And of course the reverse has happened, too...people I couldn't stand, but everyone else thought was ok. This is called, I believe, "being a human being". I shall judge no wine (or person, or pilot-person) until I've had a taste.
Not like that, you weirdoes.
PLEASE tell me you're not referring to 3701.....
Hear that @CK? I need hazard pay for the bedbugs and flying with @Boris BadenovDerg said:Me too, about three times in my career. My answer is always "I am not an evaluator"
WHEW!
As well they should have.....I hadn't heard about that accident before, but just did some reading on it. They even got a Darwin award apparently.
Same here, and had I been flying a less forgiving airframe my stupidity would have killed me and a plane load of people, and you all would have been totally justified in ripping my decision making to shreds. I still get the jitters when I think about that trip.I've done it once, but I'm still what I would consider the "FNG." I know enough to know that I still don't know enough. Been making a living flying now for 7+ years.
When I did it, or rather almost did it, it scared the crap outta me. I'm lucky to be here to talk about it, over beers in a dimly lit bar of course.
Hear that @CK? I need hazard pay for the bedbugs and flying with @Boris Badenov
Hear that @CK? I need hazard pay for the bedbugs and flying with @Boris Badenov
If they paid me in currywurst I'd be okay with it... Just ask @Rocketman99Boris Badenov said:Hah, hah. We all know you're being paid in type ratings and curry.
Amen. I've been warned about people who were, eh, let's say maybe a bit eccentric, but fine...more than once. Your opinions are your own, and you're entitled to them. But don't expect me to acquire them simply by the virtue of your say-so. And of course the reverse has happened, too...people I couldn't stand, but everyone else thought was ok. This is called, I believe, "being a human being". I shall judge no wine (or person, or pilot-person) until I've had a taste.
Not like that, you weirdoes.