Fireflights
Why am I in charge of this?
Agreed. An old instructor of mine is a Citation instructor there. Just heard he had the day off today, and wasn't on campus when the crash occurred.
Recovery in a 172. Sorry for any confusion. If you truely spin it you will need some ALT to allow it to recover on its own.z987k said:For which? The BE20 will climb away amusing it's trimmed for T/O. The 172 won't even enter a spin without the pilot making it. You'd loose like 100ft if you let go in the incipient phase.
A nasty little surprise that exists in King Airs is the Unscheduled Torque scenario, which can be worse than losing an engine because auto-feather won't help the pilot and it can be misread. (I'm not saying that's what happened here)
A loss of thrust in an engine should be verified and the cause determined. The 200 is pretty docile on one engine if its light and I agree 100% with the "do nothing until at safe altitude" opinion. Fly the thing straight ahead and figure out exactly what the problem is before doing anything rash. However an unscheduled torque may be difficult to figure out in the heat of the moment...
Sad to hear of this crash, RIP to the fallen
Bp244
That's a great point. When I went from flying piston twins to the King Air (C90), the first thing my CP said on my training flight was to not touch ANYTHING after an engine failure. He harped on not going all crazy like people tend to do in a light piston twin. With lots of power, Auto Feather, and excellent flight characteristics he was absolutely correct.
Also very curious to see how this one turns out.
Engine failures in Le Boos are ridiculously simple (…in the sim)
"Positive Rate
Gear Up
Engine failure
Do you want creamer and sugar in your coffee, Captain?"
Alright alright alrighhhht
You got a joint? No? It'd be a lot cooler if you did...
A nasty little surprise that exists in King Airs is the Unscheduled Torque scenario, which can be worse than losing an engine because auto-feather won't help the pilot and it can be misread..............