Screaming_Emu
Well-Known Member
That was from the MEC, not from management.
Right, but the company is the one saying "we're gonna shut it down."
That was from the MEC, not from management.
I don't know man.
You don't want this close of a vote by the MEC leadership on this sort of matter one way or other...
Some guys are calling it the best ever comm put out by the MEC.![]()
Wow.
A 5-4 vote is really close. So my question is, how exactly do they plan to shut down the airline if they have a contract for the next 8 years or so?
Well... The question still stands: Who exactly will pick up Eagle's flying if AAG stands by their word?
Then where are the pilots going to come from to feed the losses due to retirements over the next decade?You guys keep missing management's ace in the hole: they don't really care if nobody is able to pick up the flying. It's not profitable! If they can rape you of your compensation package and still get you to come to work, then they're fine with that. But if not, they'll radically scale back regional feed to the number of 70+ seat RJs that makes sense, and the rest of the feed will go back to small gauge mainline aircraft on reduced frequency. Same markets, same ASMs, fewer airplanes, lower CASM.
You guys keep missing management's ace in the hole: they don't really care if nobody is able to pick up the flying. It's not profitable! If they can rape you of your compensation package and still get you to come to work, then they're fine with that. But if not, they'll radically scale back regional feed to the number of 70+ seat RJs
Then where are the pilots going to come from to feed the losses due to retirements over the next decade?
True, but at the end of the day, the product you are selling to corporate buyers is your route network. When that gets bad enough, they start shopping their contracts.
Mainline.Well... The question still stands: Who exactly will pick up Eagle's flying if AAG stands by their word?
Well it's done.so what should we do now?