"(3)Waivers of the basic visual flight rules (VFR) weather minimums specified in 14 CFR § 91.155 may be considered only in areas where the entire aerobatic maneuvering sequence can be provided separation from participating and nonparticipating aircraft by ATC."
http://fsims.faa.gov/WDocs/8700.1 GA Ops Insp Handbk/Volume 2/2_048_00.htm
That does leave a wide margin of speculation of what the pilot was doing.
Ah so there is hope! Thanks for finding this.
No kidding! He's got over two dozen similar videos going back several months. (they are at the top of the video linked) I intend to savor, be inspired by and enjoy the hell outta each and every one of them and the thought of "oooh what do the regs say" is never going to cross my mind.Oh the horror...
lol.
Can we not just enjoy a fine video?
or maybe he's not in the US?
EDIT: Nvmd. I'm watching it now can see his tail#
Video is very cool
Extremely foolish of him to post a video showing that PLUS his tail
So I found this pretty cool video on Vimeo today. In it, a guy flies an experimental plane doing aeros at the tops of some clouds. Based on my knowledge of cloud clearance requirements, the only way I can think of this being legal is if his altitude was below 1,200 AGL and in class G.
Any thoughts? It looks like fun, but I just constantly imagine another airplane roaring through those clouds into a mid-air with this guy.
Damn. Not only is that one of my favorite all time songs by Bilnd Faith, it's some beautiful flying.
Thank you for posting this.
Well if you look at the cloud clearance requirements for class G above 1200, he would technically be in violation of cloud clearance requirements.
A lot of people in this thread. No need to be mean, it's an interesting discussion and a cool video. I'd you don't want to be nice, go away.WHO CARES!!!
WHO CARES!!!
I see your video and raise you one
A lot of people in this thread. No need to be mean, it's an interesting discussion and a cool video. I'd you don't want to be nice, go away.