Pilots Cited in Asiana Crash

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-...-he-didn-t-understand-to-idle.html?cmpid=yhoo

From the article:
Lee, asked whether he was concerned about his ability to perform the visual approach, told investigators he was “very concerned, yea,” according to the NTSB.

He didn’t think he could turn down the air-traffic controller’s clearance to land because other pilots were accepting approaches using visual guidance instead of instruments, he said in an interview.


This sounds like something a student pilot would say, not a 777 pilot.
IOW, "You don't have positive, confident control of your aeroplane."
 
@Polar742 -

Speaking of differences, does your aircraft automatically default to NADP-1 "close in" departure profiles? The 330 automatically defaults to that and we have to program the NADP-2 by exception.

Just curious.

Have they not done the software update for THR RED/ACC? We used to have to override that on the takeoff perf page on mini-fifi, but that was fixed about a year ago.

The TDU overrides it anyways, now.
 
They have no business flying airplanes if they are unable to land a perfectly good 777 on a perfectly good day on a perfectly long runway. Culture, respect, glare or not understanding how stuff works.... All lame excuses and BS.
This accident just pisses me off because it was so easily preventable. Grrrrr.

They, and whoever turned them loose with a plane full of passengers, needs to go live a life of servitude to those family members whose loved ones were killed so needlessly.
 
What @Polar742 said. The -300Fs do performance data through ACARS that also uplinks directly to the PERF INIT and TAKEOFF REF pages. Super simple. I don't miss the stone age crap I used to have to do at the old shop. :)

We've got that on the Glass DC9. It's pretty nice but when the numbers don't uplink it takes me a minute to remember where to find the TOCG and ZFWCG data to load it in.
 
They have no business flying airplanes if they are unable to land a perfectly good 777 on a perfectly good day on a perfectly long runway. Culture, respect, glare or not understanding how stuff works.... All lame excuses and BS.
This accident just pisses me off because it was so easily preventable. Grrrrr.

They, and whoever turned them loose with a plane full of passengers, needs to go live a life of servitude to those family members whose loved ones were killed so needlessly.

This x100
 

Attachments

  • 20131211_074653.jpg
    20131211_074653.jpg
    124.8 KB · Views: 104
They have no business flying airplanes if they are unable to land a perfectly good 777 on a perfectly good day on a perfectly long runway. Culture, respect, glare or not understanding how stuff works.... All lame excuses and BS.
This accident just pisses me off because it was so easily preventable. Grrrrr.

They, and whoever turned them loose with a plane full of passengers, needs to go live a life of servitude to those family members whose loved ones were killed so needlessly.

Amen.

From my first lesson, my CFI always said on approach: "Watch your airspeed" To this day, I hear his voice on final. And I am always cross checking my airspeed. Seems to me this would be automatic for professional pilots.

Even though I don't fly heavy metal and know next to nothing about autothrottles, etc. The basics must be the same:
On speed?, on glideslope?, how's that site picture look?, On speed?, on glideslope?, how's that site picture look?, rinse-repeat.
 
So the NTSB is recommending more hands on training without automation for all pilots because these idiots lacked basic piloting skills and have somehow managed to BS their way out of a paper bag? Yup, makes sense.
 
We've got that on the Glass DC9. It's pretty nice but when the numbers don't uplink it takes me a minute to remember where to find the TOCG and ZFWCG data to load it in.

Luckily, we don't have it on the 744, and the 748 is so half-assed we just manually load it.

Can't rely on automation...theme of the thread. ;)
 
Even though I don't fly heavy metal and know next to nothing about autothrottles, etc. The basics must be the same:
On speed?, on glideslope?, how's that site picture look?, On speed?, on glideslope?, how's that site picture look?, rinse-repeat.
Very much the same. I keep my hands on the throttles while I'm hand flying, even if I have the autothrottles hooked up. Actually, I almost always have a hand on them if they're making a big thrust change. It might be big, but it's still an airplane. Sight pictures, etc. all still work the same.
 
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-...-he-didn-t-understand-to-idle.html?cmpid=yhoo

From the article:
Lee, asked whether he was concerned about his ability to perform the visual approach, told investigators he was “very concerned, yea,” according to the NTSB.

He didn’t think he could turn down the air-traffic controller’s clearance to land because other pilots were accepting approaches using visual guidance instead of instruments, he said in an interview.


This sounds like something a student pilot would say, not a 777 pilot.

Isn't a "visual" approach still an instrument approach?

I don't think a 777 is gonna go VFR.
 
I think he meant that he felt pressured to take the visual, rather than ask for an ILS.

Why would you take an ILS on a day that was clear and a million???

Isn't the ILS approaches for low ceilings? Back when I was an uber aviation geek, I used to call ATIS (Yeah I was that guy. Don't laugh you all know you did it too) just to listen to the ATIS broadcast. Anyway, here in PHX with our weather they always say visual approach rwy. 08/26. On a rare low ceiling day then in the notes they'll state ILS approach 08/26.
 
Back
Top