Ever flown an airplane you just don't like?

EatSleepFly

Well-Known Member
The Sabreliner thread got me thinking...

Talking about types here, not necessarily a specific airframe.

What was it? What didn't you like?

I'm currently flying an Astra SP and G-100 (basically same thing) and honestly can't stand the things. I thought I'd warm up to it eventually, but I've been in it over 18 months and almost 400 hours and still don't like it.

It's a great job, however, and supposedly we are replacing the relics soon. And perhaps I'm over-exaggerating a little, but I thought this might be a fun topic.
 
The Sabreliner thread got me thinking...

Talking about types here, not necessarily a specific airframe.

What was it? What didn't you like?

I'm currently flying an Astra SP and G-100 (basically same thing) and honestly can't stand the things. I thought I'd warm up to it eventually, but I've been in it over 18 months and almost 400 hours and still don't like it.

It's a great job, however, and supposedly we are replacing the relics soon. And perhaps I'm over-exaggerating a little, but I thought this might be a fun topic.

I really don't like flying 172s. 152s are great. 177s are nice. 182s, 210s, etc, I love flying. Warriors/archers/etc, you bet. But 172s? I just ... I've tried. I've really tried. They glide well. That's about the best I can really say for them. They land short.

They're good utility airplanes. Hell, they're good airplanes in general... I just don't like them.

-Fox
 
They're good utility airplanes. Hell, they're good airplanes in general... I just don't like them.

That's how the Astra is. They're relatively cheap, pretty fast (we flight plan for 455 KTAS which is closer to LRC than max), can do coast-to-coast most of the time, and ours at least are fairly reliable. Like you said though, I just don't like 'em!
 
I really don't like flying 172s. 152s are great. 177s are nice. 182s, 210s, etc, I love flying. Warriors/archers/etc, you bet. But 172s? I just ... I've tried. I've really tried. They glide well. That's about the best I can really say for them. They land short.

They're good utility airplanes. Hell, they're good airplanes in general... I just don't like them.

-Fox

The 172 is the Chevy Cavalier of airplanes. Meets every minimum standard, but just barely.
 
The 172P's actually have a somewhat useful useful load. But yeah, easily my least favorite thing to fly. Thankfully, I hardly ever do fly them.

Yeah, I guess for me its not even about the usefulness. There's just no emotion when I fly one. Just, meh.

I feel the same way about the car I rented while mine is in the shop. Brand new Ford Explorer.

Very comfortable, Ford Sync was pretty cool until it randomly stopped streaming music over bluetooth. Ride is very nice. But it bores the living hell out of me to drive it. Now that I've driven a car like that, I understand why nobody pays attention while driving anymore, sometimes they forget they're driving at all.
 
Sure, but I don't pay for the car by the hour....

You can rent other airplanes for comparable price to accomplish the same mission. Absolutely loved my time in the Diamond Katana. Only a two seater and not IFR certified. But I'd say the piper warrior is a bit of a compromise in that direction.
 
I agree on the 172, just boring. Unfortunately such a standard as a training and rental aircraft every FBO almost "has" to have them and the cycle continues.
 
You can rent other airplanes for comparable price to accomplish the same mission. Absolutely loved my time in the Diamond Katana. Only a two seater and not IFR certified. But I'd say the piper warrior is a bit of a compromise in that direction.

Love the katana. Let's be honest, it is a glider in sheeps's clothing, what's not to like?

But totally useless trying to pick up @Rocketman99 with @Gonzo along for the ride in the soup...
 
King Air. It does the job but I can't land it.

I loved the baby Dash though. I could do everything with that airplane. Landing and taking off out of Kapalua was amazing.
 
Back
Top