Foreign student pilots and English

While Ill be the first to agree it can be better. You have got to give it to these guys. They work very very hard. The come to a foreign country, speak a foreign language, and learn how to fly airplanes. I had 22 different students signed off for 25 checkrides. Out of those 22 students only 2 knew how to drive a car, just 2. These guys have a lot to overcome and they do in 9 months what took most of us much longer to accomplish.
That's all well and good. This, however, is dangerous:

"Air China nine eighty five heavy LA ground bravo short of papa, say your gate."
"Uhhh okay to the gate Air China nine eighty five heavy."
"Air China nine eighty five heavy ground negative, taxi bravo, hold short of papa, and say your gate, over."
(etc.)
 
Actual radio comm one day 'round the patch.

TWR: Cessna 123XX, extend downwind runway 31R. You are number three behind the Bonanza.

C123XX: Logah, queered to rand oneway three one light.

TWR: Cessna 123XX, negative. Extend downwind. You are number three for 31R.

C123XX: Logah, queered to rand oneway three one light.

TWR: NEGATIVE 3XX. Extend downwind. You are number three behind he Bonanza.

C123XX: Logah, queered to rand oneway three one light.

TWR: Ah, heck. Commander 62X go around. Bonanza 85E, change to runway 31L. Cleared to land. Cessna3XX, cleared to land runway 31R.

In the scheme of things, though, I'll take the non-native English speaker with some language deficit over the local native speaker who comes bombing into the pattern backward with no radio com and makes two planes on final go around to avoid head on collisions with him. Then does a touch and go and goes around backwards a second time.
 
While Ill be the first to agree it can be better. You have got to give it to these guys. They work very very hard. The come to a foreign country, speak a foreign language, and learn how to fly airplanes. I had 22 different students signed off for 25 checkrides. Out of those 22 students only 2 knew how to drive a car, just 2. These guys have a lot to overcome and they do in 9 months what took most of us much longer to accomplish.

Agreed about the car driving. IMHO, that's why so many of these students have serious issues with basic aircraft control. They have never before controlled a large piece of machinery... even in only 2 dimensions. Now, suddenly, they are being asked to control one in 3D. Whereas the average US kid has been driving and hanging about airports for many years before flying and, therefore, knows s/he really likes aviation and has some affinity for it, most of the Asian kids seem to come straight from some job fair where they might have just as easily selected "Accountant" or "Dentist" as "Pilot". "Pilot" in Asia is still seen to be a high-wage, low-work, high-status gig. So, I suspect the motivation for becoming a pilot often has little to do with interest in or passion for the activity itself. Also, though there is often a strong work ethic, it seems to me more often than not to revolve around checking the correct boxes and putting the square pegs in the square holes.
 
That's all well and good. This, however, is dangerous:

"Air China nine eighty five heavy LA ground bravo short of papa, say your gate."
"Uhhh okay to the gate Air China nine eighty five heavy."
"Air China nine eighty five heavy ground negative, taxi bravo, hold short of papa, and say your gate, over."
(etc.)

Not sure but I think that's not what the op meant. It's about respect and giving it when it's due.
Signing off any numb nuts will be dangerous. And lack of language proficiency is another way to be a numb nuts. However, the guys and gals who come over here and do it and do it well get serious respect from me.
I won't even pretend like I would have tried to learn Chinese or Japanese or whatever then gone over there for a year or more to learn how to fly, and I consider myself a pretty big aviation nerd.

Side note, best student I ever had was Korean. Exception to the rule but none the less
 
That's all well and good. This, however, is dangerous:

"Air China nine eighty five heavy LA ground bravo short of papa, say your gate."
"Uhhh okay to the gate Air China nine eighty five heavy."
"Air China nine eighty five heavy ground negative, taxi bravo, hold short of papa, and say your gate, over."
(etc.)

Like this, for instance?

 
Not sure but I think that's not what the op meant. It's about respect and giving it when it's due.
Signing off any numb nuts will be dangerous. And lack of language proficiency is another way to be a numb nuts. However, the guys and gals who come over here and do it and do it well get serious respect from me.
I won't even pretend like I would have tried to learn Chinese or Japanese or whatever then gone over there for a year or more to learn how to fly, and I consider myself a pretty big aviation nerd.

Side note, best student I ever had was Korean. Exception to the rule but none the less
That's dandy.

It's impressive no doubt; I don't speak enough Finnish to fly for Finnair and I'm pretty sure I'd bust out of their initial training for that reason, but good damn. If you're going to be corralling several hundred tons of airplane and humans, you need to meet all the qualifications - and your response to "Hold short runway two-four left departing traffic" needs to be crisp, clear, and immediate.
 
N
That's dandy.

It's impressive no doubt; I don't speak enough Finnish to fly for Finnair and I'm pretty sure I'd bust out of their initial training for that reason, but good damn. If you're going to be corralling several hundred tons of airplane and humans, you need to meet all the qualifications - and your response to "Hold short runway two-four left departing traffic" needs to be crisp, clear, and immediate.


Again not defending the guy in your example
 
Agreed about the car driving. IMHO, that's why so many of these students have serious issues with basic aircraft control. They have never before controlled a large piece of machinery... even in only 2 dimensions.

I got my pilot's license at 17, then my motorcycle license, and then ten years later my car license... in that order. I got my private in ~42 hours. I don't buy the "Car" thing. I think there's just as much negative transfer from "car" as positive transfer. On the other hand, I dreamed and thought and schemed about aviation almost every conscious day of my childhood. (Only pilot in the family) I think that made FAR more of a difference.

~Fox
 
We have a 141 that specializes in training pilots from asia. It can be quite a mess in the pattern at times. I was on downwind one evening and we had a cessna from the 141 on a 5 mile straight in final.

tower- Cessna 1234 on downwind, turn an early right base, cleared to land runway 31 right

Myself- turning base, 31 right clear to land

tower- cessna 4321 on 5 mile final, you are number 2 following a cessna on a right base for runway 31 Right

Other pilot- Clear to land 31 right

tower- Negative cessna 4321, you're number 2 behind a cessna on base, do you have traffic in sight?

Other pilot- Clear to land 31 right

This went on until I told tower I was just going to break off. Some of the pilots at this place can't speak hardly any english. I think they learn enough to pass a test, but they don't actually comprehend what is being said to them.
 
That's dandy.

It's impressive no doubt; I don't speak enough Finnish to fly for Finnair and I'm pretty sure I'd bust out of their initial training for that reason, but good damn. If you're going to be corralling several hundred tons of airplane and humans, you need to meet all the qualifications - and your response to "Hold short runway two-four left departing traffic" needs to be crisp, clear, and immediate.

Heard one of the regionals at EWR read back cleared to cross 22r when told to hold short, captain came on almost immediately and corrected it. It's even less dandy when you've been speaking the language your whole life.

Everyone loves to think their shih tzu don't stink
 
Last edited:
Everyone loves to think their shih tzu don't stink
Not true, it is merely being pointed out that comprehension is as important as the rest of "read, speak and understand English. It is the aviation standard. When I fly in Mexico or other countries, I may not know or understand Spanish or the native language which is spoken over the frequencies. If I had to you'd be darn skippy I would learn it before trying my hand at putting myself and others at risk of an accident because of lack of comprehension.
 
Not true, it is merely being pointed out that comprehension is as important as the rest of "read, speak and understand English. It is the aviation standard. When I fly in Mexico or other countries, I may not know or understand Spanish or the native language which is spoken over the frequencies. If I had to you'd be darn skippy I would learn it before trying my hand at putting myself and others at risk of an accident because of lack of comprehension.


He is responding to the other point that these guys are in a different and more difficult learning situation, than the majority of us native english speakers were, with some seemingly dismissive and condescending phrases like "that's all well and good" and "that's dandy". And he brings up an issue of concern, which is the English comprehension of some of these foreign carriers' pilots, to qualify his admission that the guys over here have a tough row to hoe.

His point is totally valid. I just take issue with how he used it to disqualify the other one. Also, it's a little further down the line in the conversation in my opinion. I think we should be talking about the foreign carriers' training programs and hiring practices in addition to FAA approval and oversight on that one. They are only going to do what they have to do. Just like you don't learn Spanish, although I don't think you can argue it wouldn't make you safer down there, maybe to a miniscule degree maybe more I don't know, but safer none the less. So if standards are set low or not enforced... well cause and effect.

Reading the forums on the Asiana crash vs. the UPS may have gotten me a little overzealous on this one. In my opinion, the UPS one seems way more respectful and objective, as it should be, than the former even by many who criticized the media for speculation. There seems to be a willingness to throw a fellow pilot from another country under the bus, and maybe it could be justified in the Asiana case, but we don't have all the facts. I'm sure I'm guilty of it too but I try to pull the reigns in on that sort of stuff.

I definitely feel invested in this one because of my past experience of dealing with a lot of international students. I feel I owe it to the good ones to speak up, but apologize if I'm coming off as combative. Everyone's shih tzu does stink, and when I think mine doesn't I hope I quit flying. I've heard many good controllers slow down a little and speak like a robot for the international guys to clear up any difficulty they may be having.

Anyways that's where I'm coming from
 
The Navy trains many foreign air forces pilots....the USAF trains over 40 nations!!! I was the OIC of the prep school for all RNSF flight students. All foreign pilots go through language school in San Antonio but it often isn't enough. The Navy trains all allied nations who have an aircraft carrier as well, so Spain, England, Brazil, Argentina (though they no longer use their carrier but the Brazilian carrier), French and Indians. The Brazilians and Indians have a rough time with the language so we would put them in the tower, ride in the back seat, etc. The Brazilians initially can fly but when the controllers speak, they would freeze up on the controllers...I guess going from English, to Portuguese, back to English. They were generally pretty shiite hot pilots though. One of the biggest mistakes I made was taking an Indian Navy student on a cross country flight from Kingsville, TX to San Diego, California.
 
Back
Top