Landing Incident @ SFO

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder if you took away all vertical guidance at let's say JFK, and ran straight visuals all day, how many go-arounds would there be due to unstablized approaches. I'm guessing more than people think. It's not about how good you fly, it's human factors. Take away something a guy has seen for months, and then throw a wrench into it and take it away, see how they respond.

We do it every day here. VOR 13L / 13R all day long. Every single aircraft. Pass the VOR, then follow the strobes around on a base to final. You won't see a PAPI until you're below 1000'. Then when landing the 22s if LGA is in a certain configuration they stop using the ILS and starting using an offset localizer or VOR/DME.
 
We do it every day here. VOR 13L / 13R all day long. Every single aircraft. Pass the VOR, then follow the strobes around on a base to final. You won't see a PAPI until you're below 1000'. Then when landing the 22s if LGA is in a certain configuration they stop using the ILS and starting using an offset localizer or VOR/DME.

Very true. But you and me see maybe 3 landings in a span of 5 hours sometimes. Long haul guys see 3 landings a month if they are lucky.
 
Very true. But you and me see maybe 3 landings in a span of 5 hours sometimes. Long haul guys see 3 landings a month if they are lucky.

There shouldn't be luck involved when it comes to flying aircraft. Either you can fly a visual approach and safely put the aircraft on the ground, or you need to go back to training.

Btw, I'm not trying to make any point really. Just initially saying that at large (huge) airports like JFK that see aircraft from all over the world, the big boys don't get it easy when on approach into this area.

I'm damn amazed when I'm watching a heavy bank around the double tree hotel, then I see its an Asian carrier and can't even begin to imagine how fatigued those guys are and that they are managing to pull off a nice approach with very little vertical guidance.
 
Some sources are reporting that Asiana is ruling out mechanical error. Seems ridiculously premature, ...unless maybe the pilot confessed something?
 
I'm surprised you guys missed this:

"The pilot's name is Lee Jeong-min, and (he is) a veteran pilot with long experience," said the official, who requested anonymity. "Our investigation committee is looking into the accident in San Francisco," he said.
Lee, in his late 40s, had 12,387 hours of flying experience, including 3,220 hours on the Boeing 777, according to the Transport Ministry in Seoul.
A second pilot on board the aircraft, Lee Kang-kook, had 9,793 hours flying experience and 43 hours on the 777.


 
Side note, if I'm getting off a crashed airplane, and you grab your carry-on luggage... they're going to find you in the wreckage....

I don't know, man. Airline's already inconvenienced me by crashing my plane into the runway. Now I'm gonna have to sit in airport limbo for eight hours until at least 40 authorities tell me I can leave. If my bag is small and near, I'll be grabbing it on the way out. If I don't, it's gonna get burned or ruined with foam. I'd probably try to grab a beer or two from the galley as well, for the eight-hour wait. Slight:sarcasm: but not really, probably.
 
I don't know, man. Airline's already inconvenienced me by crashing my plane into the runway. Now I'm gonna have to sit in airport limbo for eight hours until at least 40 authorities tell me I can leave. If my bag is small and near, I'll be grabbing it on the way out. If I don't, it's gonna get burned or ruined with foam. I'd probably try to grab a beer or two from the galley as well, for the eight-hour wait. Slight:sarcasm: but not really, probably.

Depends what the accident is like, but if I wasn't flying I'm going back for the liquor cart. Sorry chumps, add it to my bill.
 
I don't know, man. Airline's already inconvenienced me by crashing my plane into the runway. Now I'm gonna have to sit in airport limbo for eight hours until at least 40 authorities tell me I can leave. If my bag is small and near, I'll be grabbing it on the way out. If I don't, it's gonna get burned or ruined with foam. I'd probably try to grab a beer or two from the galley as well, for the eight-hour wait. Slight:sarcasm: but not really, probably.

I'm thinking if someone is trying to get their PNT stealth 22 from the overhead and work it through the aisle while I'm trying to get to the exit, I'm going to grab it and toss it in the fire, maybe break out a bag of marshmallows to go with it.... :)
 
Sorry...but I gotta say I don't give a crap about that. If you can't do a visual approach, on a clear day, to a large international airport... You shouldn't be flying a 777. (Or any airplane). Screw "the culture over there". Land the airplane. If you can't do it VMC how the heck can you do it at 1/2 and 200ft.

You likely don't understand their culture. It is a fairly robotic culture. They go by the book. Thinking outside the box is something that has really been groomed out of them. I have flown with a ton of Koreans and found this to be an issue. Following the SOPs exactly will get you delayed sometimes. When asked to hold X speed to the marker they get behind really fast as the profile just got jacked up. This is exactly why a visual can be harder than an approach to 200-1/2. The ILS approach is purely mechanical, visuals can be interesting.

Authority figures are seen as always being THE 100% authority. The guys I flew with would see stuff I missed and wouldn't say a thing. I seriously almost had to yell at them to tell me if I messed something up.

"Captain. You forgot the taxi light" was about the best I could get.

Why is this a factor? It takes one item to keep this from happening. If the FO didn't like what he was seeing he could say something earlier rather than not at all. Obviously this assumes a botched visual and could be completely unrelated to what actually happened.

Training could definitely be improved. The international schools (FSI, transpac, ect) seem to try and push students through as fast as possible. Fast training means more money faster. It doesn't mean the students will be quality. I have had an FO turn to me at 900 TT and 600 hours in the metro and ask "how do you know where to go when cleared for a visual approach"? He was one of the good ones :(

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
 
You likely don't understand their culture. It is a fairly robotic culture. They go by the book. Thinking outside the box is something that has really been groomed out of them. I have flown with a ton of Koreans and found this to be an issue. Following the SOPs exactly will get you delayed sometimes. When asked to hold X speed to the marker they get behind really fast as the profile just got jacked up. This is exactly why a visual can be harder than an approach to 200-1/2. The ILS approach is purely mechanical, visuals can be interesting.

Authority figures are seen as always being THE 100% authority. The guys I flew with would see stuff I missed and wouldn't say a thing. I seriously almost had to yell at them to tell me if I messed something up.

"Captain. You forgot the taxi light" was about the best I could get.

Why is this a factor? It takes one item to keep this from happening. If the FO didn't like what he was seeing he could say something earlier rather than not at all. Obviously this assumes a botched visual and could be completely unrelated to what actually happened.

Training could definitely be improved. The international schools (FSI, transpac, ect) seem to try and push students through as fast as possible. Fast training means more money faster. It doesn't mean the students will be quality. I have had an FO turn to me at 900 TT and 600 hours in the metro and ask "how do you know where to go when cleared for a visual approach"? He was one of the good ones :(

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

Having worked around the ROKAF for a while over a decade ago, I can easily see where you're coming from. And while I fully agree with your assessment regards training, having training overcome the cultural mindset that's ingrained is likely a wall that will be exceptionally tough to break through, if at all; generally speaking. And unfortunately.
 
Having worked around the ROKAF for a while over a decade ago, I can easily see where you're coming from. And while I fully agree with your assessment regards training, having training overcome the cultural mindset that's ingrained is likely a wall that will be exceptionally tough to break through, if at all; generally speaking. And unfortunately.
I agree. It isn't easy to break the bad habits of a an extremely old culture. Primacy can be hard enough...
 
Well most at AMF have flown with Korean pilots. There is a reason we tell our family and friends not to fly on any Korean airlines. We knew they would follow SOPs into a mountain we just didn't think it would be a sea wall.
Maurus has pretty much said it best.
I had one guy fly me into a mountain on a clear VFR day just to hold a 3 degree decent. After loosing sight of airport behind the mountain he turns to me and asks what to do.
 
You likely don't understand their culture. It is a fairly robotic culture. They go by the book. Thinking outside the box is something that has really been groomed out of them. I have flown with a ton of Koreans and found this to be an issue. Following the SOPs exactly will get you delayed sometimes. When asked to hold X speed to the marker they get behind really fast as the profile just got jacked up. This is exactly why a visual can be harder than an approach to 200-1/2. The ILS approach is purely mechanical, visuals can be interesting.

Authority figures are seen as always being THE 100% authority. The guys I flew with would see stuff I missed and wouldn't say a thing. I seriously almost had to yell at them to tell me if I messed something up.

"Captain. You forgot the taxi light" was about the best I could get.

Why is this a factor? It takes one item to keep this from happening. If the FO didn't like what he was seeing he could say something earlier rather than not at all. Obviously this assumes a botched visual and could be completely unrelated to what actually happened.

Training could definitely be improved. The international schools (FSI, transpac, ect) seem to try and push students through as fast as possible. Fast training means more money faster. It doesn't mean the students will be quality. I have had an FO turn to me at 900 TT and 600 hours in the metro and ask "how do you know where to go when cleared for a visual approach"? He was one of the good ones :(

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

In fairness that was a metro, if the thing had real ailerons and flew like a real airplane he would know what to do. He was really asking, "Hey Capt', how do I trick this piece of crap into flying a visual approach?"

Here's one of my experiences dealing with the Chinese in my other life. An airline called Cargo King (not the second time it was named that, the third time, not to be confused with the fourth time), which was sorta' kinda' China Eastern Cargo when they were pretending to be a separate entity, was coming in for it's nightly dropoff at JFK. The MD-11 was being crewed by about 25 guys (just kidding), but it was 2 captains, 2 FO's, 2 translators, a chart runner, a load master (sometimes) and one other I never got figured out what he did. The captain on that leg was taxiing pretty fast into the JAL Cargo building and the Fed waiting out front was pissed at his choice of taxi speeds. The crew was getting off and the plane, when the Fed went into scare the pilot's mode. The pilots really didn't understand him, smiled, and left with their "ticket".

(fast forward 3 weeks)

The Captain in question was brought in for a meeting with that same Fed, listened intently while the translator explained the situation, and when the Fed started laying into the Captain the real fun began. The Captain barked at the Fed in what I can only imagine was Mandarin, barked at the translator, then stood sharply, affixed his hat, and walked out of the room. The Fed was beside himself, yet baffled, and asked the translator what the Captain had said. The translator looks the Fed right in the eye, says "I'm afraid the Captain has a stomach ache and cannot continue this meeting."

The Captains were always very nice to me, but it was clear who was in charge of everything. Accept it, move on, have a free cup of tea with them. While change may be the only constant in the universe, it comes slower to the Asians in my experience.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top