I swear we need a "stupid s*** said by news anchors" drinking game for things like this.
I wonder if you took away all vertical guidance at let's say JFK, and ran straight visuals all day, how many go-arounds would there be due to unstablized approaches. I'm guessing more than people think. It's not about how good you fly, it's human factors. Take away something a guy has seen for months, and then throw a wrench into it and take it away, see how they respond.
Or written by producers and stumbled across by the anchor who never saw it coming.
Along with the producers babbling incoherently in their ear piece while they're on air.
![]()
We do it every day here. VOR 13L / 13R all day long. Every single aircraft. Pass the VOR, then follow the strobes around on a base to final. You won't see a PAPI until you're below 1000'. Then when landing the 22s if LGA is in a certain configuration they stop using the ILS and starting using an offset localizer or VOR/DME.
Very true. But you and me see maybe 3 landings in a span of 5 hours sometimes. Long haul guys see 3 landings a month if they are lucky.
Very true. But you and me see maybe 3 landings in a span of 5 hours sometimes. Long haul guys see 3 landings a month if they are lucky.
"The pilot's name is Lee Jeong-min, and (he is) a veteran pilot with long experience," said the official, who requested anonymity. "Our investigation committee is looking into the accident in San Francisco," he said.
Lee, in his late 40s, had 12,387 hours of flying experience, including 3,220 hours on the Boeing 777, according to the Transport Ministry in Seoul.
A second pilot on board the aircraft, Lee Kang-kook, had 9,793 hours flying experience and 43 hours on the 777.
The CA was Korean and a veteran of the airline.
http://news.yahoo.com/asiana-jet-crash-further-tarnishes-korean-carriers-safety-030057994.html
Side note, if I'm getting off a crashed airplane, and you grab your carry-on luggage... they're going to find you in the wreckage....
I don't know, man. Airline's already inconvenienced me by crashing my plane into the runway. Now I'm gonna have to sit in airport limbo for eight hours until at least 40 authorities tell me I can leave. If my bag is small and near, I'll be grabbing it on the way out. If I don't, it's gonna get burned or ruined with foam. I'd probably try to grab a beer or two from the galley as well, for the eight-hour wait. Slightbut not really, probably.
I don't know, man. Airline's already inconvenienced me by crashing my plane into the runway. Now I'm gonna have to sit in airport limbo for eight hours until at least 40 authorities tell me I can leave. If my bag is small and near, I'll be grabbing it on the way out. If I don't, it's gonna get burned or ruined with foam. I'd probably try to grab a beer or two from the galley as well, for the eight-hour wait. Slightbut not really, probably.
Sorry...but I gotta say I don't give a crap about that. If you can't do a visual approach, on a clear day, to a large international airport... You shouldn't be flying a 777. (Or any airplane). Screw "the culture over there". Land the airplane. If you can't do it VMC how the heck can you do it at 1/2 and 200ft.
I'm surprised you guys missed this:
A second pilot on board the aircraft, Lee Kang-kook, had 9,793 hours flying experience and 43 hours on the 777.
You likely don't understand their culture. It is a fairly robotic culture. They go by the book. Thinking outside the box is something that has really been groomed out of them. I have flown with a ton of Koreans and found this to be an issue. Following the SOPs exactly will get you delayed sometimes. When asked to hold X speed to the marker they get behind really fast as the profile just got jacked up. This is exactly why a visual can be harder than an approach to 200-1/2. The ILS approach is purely mechanical, visuals can be interesting.
Authority figures are seen as always being THE 100% authority. The guys I flew with would see stuff I missed and wouldn't say a thing. I seriously almost had to yell at them to tell me if I messed something up.
"Captain. You forgot the taxi light" was about the best I could get.
Why is this a factor? It takes one item to keep this from happening. If the FO didn't like what he was seeing he could say something earlier rather than not at all. Obviously this assumes a botched visual and could be completely unrelated to what actually happened.
Training could definitely be improved. The international schools (FSI, transpac, ect) seem to try and push students through as fast as possible. Fast training means more money faster. It doesn't mean the students will be quality. I have had an FO turn to me at 900 TT and 600 hours in the metro and ask "how do you know where to go when cleared for a visual approach"? He was one of the good ones
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
I agree. It isn't easy to break the bad habits of a an extremely old culture. Primacy can be hard enough...Having worked around the ROKAF for a while over a decade ago, I can easily see where you're coming from. And while I fully agree with your assessment regards training, having training overcome the cultural mindset that's ingrained is likely a wall that will be exceptionally tough to break through, if at all; generally speaking. And unfortunately.
You likely don't understand their culture. It is a fairly robotic culture. They go by the book. Thinking outside the box is something that has really been groomed out of them. I have flown with a ton of Koreans and found this to be an issue. Following the SOPs exactly will get you delayed sometimes. When asked to hold X speed to the marker they get behind really fast as the profile just got jacked up. This is exactly why a visual can be harder than an approach to 200-1/2. The ILS approach is purely mechanical, visuals can be interesting.
Authority figures are seen as always being THE 100% authority. The guys I flew with would see stuff I missed and wouldn't say a thing. I seriously almost had to yell at them to tell me if I messed something up.
"Captain. You forgot the taxi light" was about the best I could get.
Why is this a factor? It takes one item to keep this from happening. If the FO didn't like what he was seeing he could say something earlier rather than not at all. Obviously this assumes a botched visual and could be completely unrelated to what actually happened.
Training could definitely be improved. The international schools (FSI, transpac, ect) seem to try and push students through as fast as possible. Fast training means more money faster. It doesn't mean the students will be quality. I have had an FO turn to me at 900 TT and 600 hours in the metro and ask "how do you know where to go when cleared for a visual approach"? He was one of the good ones
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2