To my knowledge it has not been filed yet.Is the class action throwing a wrench into things?
To my knowledge it has not been filed yet.Is the class action throwing a wrench into things?
Ahem.
And this is what I did:One immediate finding from our own examination of the situation was of great concern to us. The missing elevator was discovered near a runway from which the crew had taken off on an earlier leg the same day. This indicated the crew had failed to perform the mandatory and routine walk-around to inspect the plane following that first leg – a direct violation of Avantair policy, which requires that both crew members inspect each plane before each flight. The crew members from the July flight at issue no longer are employed at Avantair. Additionally, our pilots have been re-trained on the importance of this rule and our zero-tolerance policy for failure to comply with it and all other Company policies and procedures.
Lol you must work for a company that does contract maintenace for them...Sometimes you just have to tell them no and explain that it IS an important part of the aircraft
Awesome! That's good news!A little update. As of today out of the total 227 pilots, 217 are active flying and the remaining 10 on furlough are the ones that chose to bypass.
Also, as of today Avantair is officially unionized! The pilots overwhelmingly voted in SMART (formerly UTU) to represent the pilot group. Very good news.
One level of...oh never mind.No I just understand how the economics of aviation and 135 work.
You're going to have to finish that because I've never seen anything in reality that I can complete that sentence with. (I have no idea what you're talking about)One level of...oh never mind.
I'm pretty sure 24 on call was never legal, and there have been more opinions from the chief consul on the topic than I can count. Including one say that the POI or FSDO can't say it's ok.It's "safety". It's an ALPA catch phrase. I like the idea. The cargo cutout is wrong cause there should be one level of safety. Bringing that to 135 is problematic as it's a different industry somewhat used to the Feds looking the other way. For example, I sometimes read about 135 and 24 hour on call. Whitlow made 24 hour on call illegal, yet I often read it still exists at some 135's. Crazy business we are in....