daily pic

Been looking at getting one of these, will make backcountry photo safaris much easier methinks. Plus with the bike, tons better too!

I love mine. I have the larger 2 strap one..its great. The camera pouch is padded and has a sort of suspension to keep things safe during adventure sports. And with the waste straps, the whole pack stays where it is supposed to. Had a pouch for a water pouch, and routing for the house. The back is reinforced so you don't feel the water bag on your back. It'll fit my laptop, but if I do that it wont fit clothes. I love it though, terrific product.
 
KSCessnaDriver / & Apophis, any chance one of you two were in West Chicago over the weekend for the golf tourney? Saw a large air filled craft tied down at DPA when we launched down to Smryna...also saw it the day before going over Bolingbrook and the 355 Tollway. If it is one of you guys, hit me up, I'll buy ya a beer.
 
http://www.lowepro.com/photosport

I can fit a few sets of clothes, my camera gear, some food, and the other various essentials in it; and unless you know LowePro, it really only looks like a small backpack.

Pretty cool, I usually I try not to look like "I just got back from an hike" when I travel, but it does look like a cool way to carry your stuff. I haven`t got a DSLR so far becasue I just can`t keep a low profile with it, and I always felt that such a big camera would put me at risk in most places I usually travel.

In Vanuatu you could walk with 10 cameras strapped to your neck and nobody would care, I got robbers in my house twice over there, all they were looking for was cash....they are not interested in cameras, laptops,...

So far I have been more then happy with my little Canon S95 and the lensmate filters module...
 
KSCessnaDriver / & Apophis, any chance one of you two were in West Chicago over the weekend for the golf tourney? Saw a large air filled craft tied down at DPA when we launched down to Smryna...also saw it the day before going over Bolingbrook and the 355 Tollway. If it is one of you guys, hit me up, I'll buy ya a beer.

This past weekend, I was there, with DirecTV for the Bears game. Snoopy 2 should be there now for the Ryder cup, but that isn't me or Apophis
 
Haven't been to Rio Dulce but it looks like fun too. Too much world, too little time & money.

I lived in Livingstone, this small town/village on the Caribe side of Guatemala, no road access to the rest of the country, we would fly in by Pilatus Porter from the Capital, and stay at the airplane`s owner hotel Vila Caribe...they also own a beach 45 minutes boat ride from Livingstone with amazing bonefishing, if you take the Rio Dulce up stream there is also good fishing and water sports, we would catch endless Mojarras just by floating some berries on a hook and line off the boat...

Guatemala has probably some of the most beautiful colors I have ever seen for Photography
 
This past weekend, I was there, with DirecTV for the Bears game. Snoopy 2 should be there now for the Ryder cup, but that isn't me or Apophis
That's funny. I saw the DirecTV ship and mentioned to my wife that I'm familiar with a few of the guys that pilot those ships on JC, and was wondering if that was you.

Naturally, I was much more interested in that line of communication than she was. :(
 
Yup, it was Direct TV I saw...Damn, just missed ya!

Yup. I'm actually in Tampa, FL right now. Got here last night. We're covering the Florida State @ USF game on Saturday, then next Saturday we're doing the Georgia @ South Carolina game in Columbia.
 
ZOMFG We landed the blimp on a golf course! (Snoopy there in the foreground)

Snoopy-1 Golf Course.jpg
 
Yup. I'm actually in Tampa, FL right now. Got here last night. We're covering the Florida State @ USF game on Saturday, then next Saturday we're doing the Georgia @ South Carolina game in Columbia.

If Georgia loses the game, I'm holding you personally responsible ;)
 
I have to imagine it must be pretty simple to land a blimp like that? I've no idea how you guys operate, but I imagine that if the winds are cooperating, it's pretty much a "yep, that's a big enough check of earth...fly over it, let air out" based operation?
 
I have to imagine it must be pretty simple to land a blimp like that? I've no idea how you guys operate, but I imagine that if the winds are cooperating, it's pretty much a "yep, that's a big enough check of earth...fly over it, let air out" based operation?

Yeah, its nothing like that. Landing an airplane is a cakewalk compared to landing an airship. First, venting helium, is a very, very, very expensive proposition, as well as expensive. Landing is a circus, for lack of a better term. Think very little weight, only a hundred or so pounds, maybe a bit more or less. Then think of the surface area of the airship and how the wind effects it. We basically have to fly the airship into a formation of guys, who then grab the ropes that hang from the nose, where they then maneuver the airship on the ground
 
I have to imagine it must be pretty simple to land a blimp like that? I've no idea how you guys operate, but I imagine that if the winds are cooperating, it's pretty much a "yep, that's a big enough check of earth...fly over it, let air out" based operation?

Actually it was incredibly difficult landing the blimp on this driving range. It was lined with trees on all sides (which cause mechanical turbulence, which makes landing more difficult). Plus, trying to land in a small field in the middle of the afternoon when there are a lot of thermals isn't easy.

Even when we are operating at an airport, we generally take off and land on the runways only if the wind is closely aligned with the runway. Usually we'll land in a grassy area adjacent to runways or taxiways instead. We almost always takeoff and land directly into the wind (there are several reasons for this).

As far as finding a field large enough, you just have to use your best judgement. Yes, we have published takeoff and landing distance/performance numbers, however, since we almost never takeoff and land on an airport surface with published distances (runways), you basically have to make an educated guess.

Even though we don't travel at fast speeds, I would never say that landing one of these things is easy, because it's not. There are a myriad of conditions you have to consider (i.e. how statically heavy/light you are, wind direction and velocity, size of the field you're landing in, obstacles, etc).

You've probably never flown an aircraft where you can have a 30 degree nose-down pitch attitude, zero indicated airspeed, and still be climbing at 500+ feet per minute.
 
Actually it was incredibly difficult landing the blimp on this driving range. It was lined with trees on all sides (which cause mechanical turbulence, which makes landing more difficult). Plus, trying to land in a small field in the middle of the afternoon when there are a lot of thermals isn't easy.

Even when we are operating at an airport, we generally take off and land on the runways only if the wind is closely aligned with the runway. Usually we'll land in a grassy area adjacent to runways or taxiways instead. We almost always takeoff and land directly into the wind (there are several reasons for this).

As far as finding a field large enough, you just have to use your best judgement. Yes, we have published takeoff and landing distance/performance numbers, however, since we almost never takeoff and land on an airport surface with published distances (runways), you basically have to make an educated guess.

Even though we don't travel at fast speeds, I would never say that landing one of these things is easy, because it's not. There are a myriad of conditions you have to consider (i.e. how statically heavy/light you are, wind direction and velocity, size of the field you're landing in, obstacles, etc).

You've probably never flown an aircraft where you can have a 30 degree nose-down pitch attitude, zero indicated airspeed, and still be climbing at 500+ feet per minute.


Thanks for the replies guys, it's obvious how uninformed I am...I didn't mean to dismiss flying it, just completely oblivious to those operations.
 
Yeah, its nothing like that. Landing an airplane is a cakewalk compared to landing an airship. First, venting helium, is a very, very, very expensive proposition, as well as expensive. Landing is a circus, for lack of a better term. Think very little weight, only a hundred or so pounds, maybe a bit more or less. Then think of the surface area of the airship and how the wind effects it. We basically have to fly the airship into a formation of guys, who then grab the ropes that hang from the nose, where they then maneuver the airship on the ground

Do you have any instrument approaches that consist of a vertical descent over a point vs a more standard airplane glide slope? I imagine even a 20kt cross wind would require a substantial crab to keep on the beam.What are your limits?
 
Thanks for the replies guys, it's obvious how uninformed I am...I didn't mean to dismiss flying it, just completely oblivious to those operations.

No problem, and wasn't accusing you of anything of the sort. :) LTA-Airship is probably the rarest category/class rating you can find out there. There really just aren't many airships or pilots who can fly them out there.
 
You've probably never flown an aircraft where you can have a 30 degree nose-down pitch attitude, zero indicated airspeed, and still be climbing at 500+ feet per minute.

That is an amusing visual. And I picture @KSCessnaDriver's description of the landing with a healthy dose of Yakety Sax.
 
Do you have any instrument approaches that consist of a vertical descent over a point vs a more standard airplane glide slope? I imagine even a 20kt cross wind would require a substantial crab to keep on the beam.What are your limits?

No. If you want to fly an instrument approach (and technically you can, the ones I fly are IFR certified and all required inspections are current), you fly it just like an airplane. You can probably understand how impractical IFR flight in an airship is due to the lack of speed.

I've never flown an approach in IMC, however I've done a few practice approaches in VMC under the hood. Staying on the localizer/glideslope centerline can be a challenge, especially if there's a strong crosswind and it's really thermally (like say, in the middle of the afternoon). The crab angles can get kind of crazy, which can make things more.... interesting.

On the plus side, you have more time to brief and familiarize yourself with the approach. Oh yeah, it's pretty much impossible to ever find yourself in an unusual attitude in an airship as well, so that's nice. :)
 
Back
Top