Budget Woes Leave Army Aviation Few Options

Read this earlier today. Really, a sensational title for an article lacking in the requisite doom.
 
Aviation is expensive. Anyone who has been around military aviation more than 12 years knew this was coming. Interesting- Tony Crutchfield was the battalion XO when I was a company commander. Probably one of the best officers I ever worked with. At that time we were under severe budget cuts- so much so that if I wanted to dispatch a vehicle from the motor pool I had to get the first O-6 in my chain of command to sign off on the dispatch for a while. Flying? There were times we were grounded for weeks and only went out and did weekly runups of the aircraft.
 
Aviation is expensive. Anyone who has been around military aviation more than 12 years knew this was coming. Interesting- Tony Crutchfield was the battalion XO when I was a company commander. Probably one of the best officers I ever worked with. At that time we were under severe budget cuts- so much so that if I wanted to dispatch a vehicle from the motor pool I had to get the first O-6 in my chain of command to sign off on the dispatch for a while. Flying? There were times we were grounded for weeks and only went out and did weekly runups of the aircraft.

Looks like it will go that way again unfortunately. I was just at a planning meeting last week where my Reserve unit is expecting to lose up to 2/3 of its current flying hours program budget in the next FY. That equates to just over 2 sorties a week, or 1 formation per week. With the number of personnel we have, I don't know how any of the traditional Reservists are going to maintain proficiency.
 
I don't know how any of the traditional Reservists are going to maintain proficiency.

... don't ever confuse proficiency with currency ... I remember all too well when Risk Assessment only involved currency not proficiency.
 
... don't ever confuse proficiency with currency ... I remember all too well when Risk Assessment only involved currency not proficiency.

Believe me, I won't. Currency does not equal proficiency. But in the Reserves, with people's civilian careers and all of life's complexities, currency is sometimes the best you can hope for.
 
Believe me, I won't. Currency does not equal proficiency. But in the Reserves, with people's civilian careers and all of life's complexities, currency is sometimes the best you can hope for.

agreed ... been there, done that ... and with the forthcoming downsizing, budget cuts, overreactions and such, the proficiency part is lost on the commanders. I told a commander once... if you think training is expensive, wait till you have to pay for an accident.
 
agreed ... been there, done that ... and with the forthcoming downsizing, budget cuts, overreactions and such, the proficiency part is lost on the commanders. I told a commander once... if you think training is expensive, wait till you have to pay for an accident.

Regarding your last sentence, I couldn't agree more. The whole climate surrounding defense spending in this country has me very confused. I keep hearing words from politicians like "smaller", "more flexible", etc. Okay, I can understand the concept. But behind those words the budget is getting slashed to the point that these "smaller, more flexible" forces can't afford to train and as a result aren't going to be combat ready in any way. I'm all for finding better ways to do things, but our military leaders have obviously learned nothing from history. Every time we gut our forces following conflicts, another inevitably breaks out and we're woefully unprepared.
 
Regarding your last sentence, I couldn't agree more. The whole climate surrounding defense spending in this country has me very confused. I keep hearing words from politicians like "smaller", "more flexible", etc. Okay, I can understand the concept. But behind those words the budget is getting slashed to the point that these "smaller, more flexible" forces can't afford to train and as a result aren't going to be combat ready in any way. I'm all for finding better ways to do things, but our military leaders have obviously learned nothing from history. Every time we gut our forces following conflicts, another inevitably breaks out and we're woefully unprepared.
Like I said, last time around it was pretty bad. Money was so short soldiers were only given their 40 rounds of 5.56 for qualification each year. If a soldier did not qualify- too bad. No extra ammunition. Our NTC rotation was cancelled. Field exercises were cancelled. Officers were being cut left and right. In my wife's year group there was a 1LT retention board prior to the captain promotion board. Between those two boards only 75% of 1LTs made captain. It was ugly.
 
Our NTC rotation was cancelled.

No Ft Irwin for you!

In my wife's year group there was a 1LT retention board prior to the captain promotion board. Between those two boards only 75% of 1LTs made captain. It was ugly.

Which doubly sucks because I've noticed in the Army, that guys make O-2 in about a year and a half, versus the two years of other services; and seemingly the same year and a half from O-2 to O-3.
 
I don't know whats worse.....missing NTC at Ft Irwin, or missing JRTC at Ft Polk. Both are great garden spot locations!
 
A cancelled NTC rotation would be heartbreaking.
When you are doing real rotations every other year not a big deal. When only 1% of your unit has seen combat it is a big deal. One of the major factors behind the success of Gulf War 1 was NTC.
 
No Ft Irwin for you!



Which doubly sucks because I've noticed in the Army, that guys make O-2 in about a year and a half, versus the two years of other services; and seemingly the same year and a half from O-2 to O-3.
Depends on the time. When I was commissioned it was 18 months but got bumped to 24 months by the time my wife was commissioned (I was grandfathered at 20 months). With a war they bumped it back to 18 months I guess.
 
When you are doing real rotations every other year not a big deal. When only 1% of your unit has seen combat it is a big deal. One of the major factors behind the success of Gulf War 1 was NTC.

Oh, I know... was playing and had my soldier hat on and not my commander hat.
 
Army guys:

What's the worst CONUS Army post you've been to?

I rank up as "up there" being, mainly due to geographical being in the middle of nowhere:

Ft Hunter-Liggett, CA
Ft Wingate, NM
Ft Ord, CA
Ft Leonard-Wood, MO
Ft Irwin, CA

For overall geographic "suck" location:

Ft Stewart, GA
Redstone Arsenal, AL
Ft Polk, LA
Ft Bragg, NC
Ft Benning, GA
Ft Hood, TX
Ft Indiantown Gap, PA

Im probably missing a few......
 
Would be easier to list good Army posts.

Ft. Lewis
Ft. Myer/McNair
Anything in Germany/Italy
...
 
Army guys:

What's the worst CONUS Army post you've been to?

I rank up as "up there" being, mainly due to geographical being in the middle of nowhere:

Ft Hunter-Liggett, CA
Ft Wingate, NM
Ft Ord, CA
Ft Leonard-Wood, MO
Ft Irwin, CA

For overall geographic "suck" location:

Ft Stewart, GA
Redstone Arsenal, AL
Ft Polk, LA
Ft Bragg, NC
Ft Benning, GA
Ft Hood, TX
Ft Indiantown Gap, PA

Im probably missing a few......
Dude, where have you been? Ord and Wingate are long gone.
Hunter Army Airfield was a great assignment. I also liked the little I saw of Lewis. Ft. Bragg was a great place for being a soldier... geographically not so hot. Can't think of many other stellar posts for aviators. I did not mind Bliss. Good skiing nearby.
Some guys really love Alaska.
 
Back
Top