Well to be honest I don't believe in paying to play, but your statement is arrogant. First of all there are places that have two pilots sitting in a single piston because it allows the pilot to concentrate more on flying the airplane. Let's say an outfit wants two pilots sitting in a C210, but duh the airplane is single pilot. Does that really mean another pilot shouldn't be sitting there? Should the FAA put a placard in every single pilot qualified airplane that only one pilot is to sit in the airplane? I believe that two pilots can make the cockpit safer and let two people learn new things since you have two different pilots, with different training backgrounds.
The problem is there aren't proper CRM training courses for these types of airplanes/operations. They take two pilots, teach them how to fly the airplane single pilot, and throw 'em together in a crew and tell them to go at it. That's way unsafer then me just flying the damn thing single pilot.
Crew resource management is a very useful tool in the cockpit. Maybe you do not have experience with crew resource management, but don't bring other people down with saying that only one pilot is needed in a Metro.
Our company and Ameriflight seem to do it on a daily basis. In fact we have one pilot with probably 10 years on the metro, I wonder how he hasn't offed himself yet?
I have heard many people tell me that the Metro is a very difficult airplane to fly single pilot. I bet it would be much easier on the PIC if there was some help in the right seat from an FO. BTW a first officer/pilot monitoring is a equally qualified pilot too.
What would I know, I only fly it. You'd be wrong. Great, did we all go through an extensive CRM course together, in ground, in the sim, to fly this properly with two pilots? If not? Sit on your hands and don't touch a thing.
I don't sponsor pay to fly jobs, but don't bring down other good jobs that pay pilots decent money to sit right seat even though they can't log it. Why rant about this when it doesn't affect your life. Who cares what others do to start their career you can't change it, so stop ranting on others that didn't go the supposed "Do your time as a CFI route."
Did I mention, do your time as a CFI?
BTW it didn't take me long to answer your question. An FO in a Metro would take some of the duties off of you while you are flying and maybe provide a second opinion during flights. It is always hard to fly with a pilot that doesn't want any help because his or hers ego is to big to ask for any help or input.
He'll more then likely increase my workload, see above.
My suggestion?
Keep looking for low time opportunities, but get your CFI.
Here's the trick. You can sit around searching and languishing for months, if not years and then end up with the same quandary of what to do as a low time pilot. But at least you would have earned your CFI and have an additional option to continue flying.
Do NOT wait for something "magic" to happen with those times.
Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner.
The problem is this guy is trying to get a job with low time AFTER logging this unloggable time.
The time isn't unloggable, most of these companies have an exemption to allow for the logging of SIC time in a single pilot airplane. The flight time is legit in the logbook, it just can't be used towards a rating. So for example this guy has 300 hours from the program, he now needs 1800TT to get his ATP. It's still legally loggable flight time though. Now does the flight time really mean anything? Not really...
(credit goes to Brett for winning me beer)