I probably would have shut them down too given the [apparent] conditions. There's a point were you just have to commit to the landing anyway. Why not try to prevent a little extra damage? :dunno:
It ends up being the PIC's decision in the end, and it could make you or break you...just remember, if faced with this situation that the insurance company owns that airplane when all is said and done, so why take a chance? If I end up in the situation, personal plane or for work, I'm keeping them running until I have mains on the runway or belly on the runway. I am not worried about engines, since if I screw it up shutting them down early, I'm done career wise. Let the insurance company figure it out is my motto.There's no right or wrong answer. If one wants to shutdown prior, has planned for it accordingly, has the SA to do it, and pulls it off successfully, then good for them. Im not going to judge. If on the other hand one doesn't want to do it for whatever reason, plans for that, and pulls that off successfully, then good for them too.
It ends up being the PIC's decision in the end, and it could make you or break you...just remember, if faced with this situation that the insurance company owns that airplane when all is said and done, so why take a chance? If I end up in the situation, personal plane or for work, I'm keeping them running until I have mains on the runway or belly on the runway. I am not worried about engines, since if I screw it up shutting them down early, I'm done career wise. Let the insurance company figure it out is my motto.
Any landing all passengers walk away from is a good one.*
* modified a quote to fit the pro pilot...
on the flipside......if he did it and ended up screwing the pooch, well that now gets into "hero or zero" territory. YMMV.
No points deducted for even allowing that to be a possibility?