Please review this thread for more info on the Optec 900: http://forums.jetcareers.com/ask-flight-surgeon/109430-farnsworth-lantern-optec-900-a.html
I have a few questions... I had the night flight restriction on my medical from failing one of the first color vision tests I have ever taken... After which I have taken the FALANT, and passed (at a College of Optometry, took forever to find one) sometime in 2007 or 2008, and at the time the FAA was giving out Letter's of Evidence so you wouldn't have to re-take the alternate test again. They erroneously sent me a letter telling me that the FALANT was no longer a valid test, so I called them back to raise hell, and they apologized, sent me my corrected medical certificate, and to my surprise, along with it a letter stating that they NO LONGER are issuing letters of evidence for lab based color vision tests, and that I must retake it every time I renew, or take the MFT/OCVT which is a one time pass/fail with the fed's. It is my suspicion that they knew the rules were changing, so they sent me the erroneous letter on purpose to hold me up in their system so I wouldn't be grandfathered in and receive an LOE. So this is where the headache started. I always knew I didn't have any real world issues with color vision, and didn't even know I had a "problem"... Neither did anyone else throughout my life, because in the real world, I don't. The Doc at the college even gave me a battery of other tests; some non FAA approved ones even, including the Nagel Anomaloscope. It was determined that I am either normal, or mild deuteronomy... Borderline mild green deficiency at worst, normal at best. A bunch of other tests he gave me determined I was normal as well. About the ishihara plates - On the 14 plate version (They test on plates 1 thru 11 I think) To my surprise, I get like 9 or 10 right under fluorescent and incandescent lighting, and 6 to 8 under daylight. They allow 5 or less errors on that one. So technically I pass that one as well. If I remember correctly, I passed the keystone telebinocular as well, but it was difficult to see.
I stuck with my office IT job throughout the recession, and really want to get out there to start my new travels as a pilot before I get too much older and rooted... I want to end this anxiety of not knowing if one day I won't pass my medical (color vision) after the enormous chronological and financial sacrifice to become a pilot. Why should someone like me - even when they passed many times - have to spend 100's of dollars every year to fly out to a different region of the country to take a test they are comfortable with passing just because they were born a certain way, while others do not? This really irks me since it used to be a one time hassle, which was bad enough, but better than this, and if it was such a damn safety concern, why do they still allow people to fly that were grandfathered in when they don't need to be retested every medical? Has anyone written letters to the FAA about this? If not they should, because it is simply not fair.
Since the FALANT will eventually disappear (it's old and pricey), how are the pass/fail numbers of the Optec 900 when compared to the FALANT, will the FAA eventually arbitrarily disapprove it in the future? What about the Dvorine? I have no luck finding this test anywhere.
What would you recommend for me? Purposely fail the lab test so I can get approval to take the one time MFT/OCVT just so I can get on with my life? Or keep this out of the hands of the fed's and leave it to the doctors, but at the cost of hassle, time, money and anxiety?
Any word on this new CAD computer based test that was supposed to be more fair and objective?
Sorry for the long winded post... I've been at this struggle since 2007, and I want to know where I stand.
Thanks for your time, and reading... I may come out to visit and try out some of your tests if needed.
I have a few questions... I had the night flight restriction on my medical from failing one of the first color vision tests I have ever taken... After which I have taken the FALANT, and passed (at a College of Optometry, took forever to find one) sometime in 2007 or 2008, and at the time the FAA was giving out Letter's of Evidence so you wouldn't have to re-take the alternate test again. They erroneously sent me a letter telling me that the FALANT was no longer a valid test, so I called them back to raise hell, and they apologized, sent me my corrected medical certificate, and to my surprise, along with it a letter stating that they NO LONGER are issuing letters of evidence for lab based color vision tests, and that I must retake it every time I renew, or take the MFT/OCVT which is a one time pass/fail with the fed's. It is my suspicion that they knew the rules were changing, so they sent me the erroneous letter on purpose to hold me up in their system so I wouldn't be grandfathered in and receive an LOE. So this is where the headache started. I always knew I didn't have any real world issues with color vision, and didn't even know I had a "problem"... Neither did anyone else throughout my life, because in the real world, I don't. The Doc at the college even gave me a battery of other tests; some non FAA approved ones even, including the Nagel Anomaloscope. It was determined that I am either normal, or mild deuteronomy... Borderline mild green deficiency at worst, normal at best. A bunch of other tests he gave me determined I was normal as well. About the ishihara plates - On the 14 plate version (They test on plates 1 thru 11 I think) To my surprise, I get like 9 or 10 right under fluorescent and incandescent lighting, and 6 to 8 under daylight. They allow 5 or less errors on that one. So technically I pass that one as well. If I remember correctly, I passed the keystone telebinocular as well, but it was difficult to see.
I stuck with my office IT job throughout the recession, and really want to get out there to start my new travels as a pilot before I get too much older and rooted... I want to end this anxiety of not knowing if one day I won't pass my medical (color vision) after the enormous chronological and financial sacrifice to become a pilot. Why should someone like me - even when they passed many times - have to spend 100's of dollars every year to fly out to a different region of the country to take a test they are comfortable with passing just because they were born a certain way, while others do not? This really irks me since it used to be a one time hassle, which was bad enough, but better than this, and if it was such a damn safety concern, why do they still allow people to fly that were grandfathered in when they don't need to be retested every medical? Has anyone written letters to the FAA about this? If not they should, because it is simply not fair.
Since the FALANT will eventually disappear (it's old and pricey), how are the pass/fail numbers of the Optec 900 when compared to the FALANT, will the FAA eventually arbitrarily disapprove it in the future? What about the Dvorine? I have no luck finding this test anywhere.
What would you recommend for me? Purposely fail the lab test so I can get approval to take the one time MFT/OCVT just so I can get on with my life? Or keep this out of the hands of the fed's and leave it to the doctors, but at the cost of hassle, time, money and anxiety?
Any word on this new CAD computer based test that was supposed to be more fair and objective?
Sorry for the long winded post... I've been at this struggle since 2007, and I want to know where I stand.
Thanks for your time, and reading... I may come out to visit and try out some of your tests if needed.