CoffeeIcePapers
Well-Hung Member
I do know that and have alot of respect for Mark's opinion. That's part of the reason I asked if he knew of any such cases. I really find it odd that in all the articles on the need for CFI non-owner insurance I have never once seen reference to such a case. If it's such an issue surely there are examples.
I am not telling CFIs they do not need insurance. Every policy is different. I just have not seen a case of a CFI not actually being covered by the open pilot clause, unless they did not meet the requirements of the specific open pilot clause. In those cases the courts have made clear that their rulings in favor of the insurance companies are based upon the failure of the CFI to meet those minimums and not qualify as an insured pilot.
Why would there be easily accessible case law in a civil matter?