scooter2525
Very well Member
1900' circling?!?, wuss.
Linky no worky. 1900 ain't much but that airport is one of the interesting locations next to a mountaint surrounded by mountains.
1900' circling?!?, wuss.
maybe this link will work
Edited to add:
Excellent idea doing training at night. Since both 135 and ATP need 100 hours, its just killing 2 birds with one stone early on, as you may not find a job that will allow you to build that time easily.
I currently have about 15 PIC night from my cross countries, I'll talk to my instructor about it. I doubt he'll go for it since he also has temperature minimums...
I just looked at my log, I had 10 hours of actual for my instrument training and I'm glad I did...it was a great learning experience. My notes say we picked up some light ice a couple times as well as some carb ice. Not something I would've wanted to see for the first time flying alone and in fact when I went to my club for the IFR checkout, we did the ride in IMC (3.2 hours hand flown in the DC ADIZ area = smoker) and also got some carb and structural ice...the instructor had come up from Florida and it was his first encounter with both in over 300 CFII hours.
I would ditch an instructor who had a blanket policy of no flying in less than 2500 feet or no IMC in the winter. One of the reasons humans are in the cockpit is to apply judgment and make decisions based on presented factors, if he can't do that then you will only learn skills from him at the detriment of gaining experience (if that makes sense to anyone but me). When we were in the soup, my instructor would take the plane and let me just look around...see what ice looks like on the gear for example. He helped me gain an understanding of the differences in the two environments beyond looking at the dash board. As the saying goes, a picture is worth 1000 words.
Talk to your instructor and try to make it work...even if you are just practicing holds over the field until you start to accumulate, it will be worth it. Obviously, don't do anything that will get you a ride in an ambulance.
Also, the night idea is a good one too...I did about 20 hours of my IFR training at night. If you can find some rural areas without ground lights, its pretty close to IFR.
I think you can only use 20 hours worth of sim time towards your rating.....I think there are a couple exceptions, but for the most part it's 20 hours. I'd say get comfortable with the hood. Like it or not, that hood easier to get into than actual, and more realistic than the sim.
Simulated vice simulator.
......... I'd say do as much hood work as possible, because that's probably how you will do your checkride anyways. Actual time is hard to come by, especially for a private pilot. Take your time, get your hood work in, and the actual time will come.
the freezing level is something you need to contend with, it is a serious concern. But a 400' layer with no precip is being a bit too cautious...
I wasn't there/didn't see the weather/read the TAFs. But I will say that flying an approach is way different in actual than under the hood. If at all possible, you really want to do it with an instructor before doing it yourself.
And make sure your instructor has more than XXX hours actual time (arbitrary number) - I don't think someone that has only flown under the hood can teach you effectively about weather decisions.
Could not agree more. I recently flew with an instructor who had actual and it was my first actual experience at nighttime no less and it was fantastic. He was completely calm about it, even took the plane from me and slowed it down so I could reach outside and "touch" the clouds. It was a fantastic experience, and we were basically riding the tops afterward, it's amazing to go flying in a night, come out on top and it's just a beautiful starry full moon night.
oh yeah, and shooting an approach in actual is something that you absolutely can't emulate except for MAYBE hood at night (most of my flying is done at night thanks to the good ol job)
Good luck!
He's never going to conduct an evaluation in low IMC in the first place.
That's where I got lucky. My CFII was a freight dawg and is a current part 91 lear pilot who has lots of time working the system. We've even done some short IFR x-c's to get me comfortable with the system and I think his instruction will serve me well in the future.the freezing level is something you need to contend with, it is a serious concern. But a 400' layer with no precip is being a bit too cautious...
I wasn't there/didn't see the weather/read the TAFs. But I will say that flying an approach is way different in actual than under the hood. If at all possible, you really want to do it with an instructor before doing it yourself.
And make sure your instructor has more than XXX hours actual time (arbitrary number) - I don't think someone that has only flown under the hood can teach you effectively about weather decisions.
So let me get this straight, you're getting checked out (checkride) with a fellow (DPE) who feels that published FAA minimums are too low? What exactly are you paying him to evaluate?
I did my American multi add-on in actual, and broke out 200' above mins. It happens.
I knew there would be at least one here that would sharpshoot.
I should have posted this:
Based on my experience, having taken both my private instrument and multi with a FAA examiner (not a designee), I personally doubt you will take your evaluation in low IMC. MOST (note emphasis) examiners won't launch into low IMC for the sole purpose of evaluating the performance of a pilot seeking an initial instrument rating. There, is that a little more clear?
It doesn't pass the safety test.
way to make me sad man!Enjoy night flying if you ever get back to Brazil you are not going to see any of that with small GA planes.
I knew there would be at least one here that would sharpshoot.
I should have posted this:
Based on my experience, having taken both my private instrument and multi with a FAA examiner (not a designee), I personally doubt you will take your evaluation in low IMC. MOST (note emphasis) examiners won't launch into low IMC for the sole purpose of evaluating the performance of a pilot seeking an initial instrument rating. There, is that a little more clear?
This is from someone that has tested their "personal minimums" the hard way, and grew up flying in that crap.
+1
Find someone who's experienced that can help you develop your ADM, otherwise you'll end up under a shelf cloud during t-storm season, or your first experience with icing will be while solo at night in a twin.