Buzzing of Santa Monica Pier raises safety questions

GatorFC

Well-Known Member
This happened last year, but it's in the news now because the pilot's misdemeanor criminal case is starting to ramp up next week.

Buzzing of Santa Monica Pier leads to questions about aviation safety
LA Times said:
Racing at speeds of up to 350 mph, the Soviet-made military jet made several low-altitude passes at the Santa Monica Pier, seemingly keying on the popular Ferris wheel as frightened onlookers scattered, some screaming.

Emergency calls poured in to police as the aircraft flew about 50 feet off the ground, then spiraled skyward in a series of tight rolls, smoke trailing from its tail as if it were an aerobatic plane. The lifeguard in Tower 26 said the jet passed so close that she felt a wall of heat.
The guy responsible for this seems like a real piece of work.
LA Times said:
According to the FAA, Riggs, 47, obtained his private pilot's license in 1984. Besides the FAA enforcement action and Santa Monica case, court documents show that he served time in Hong Kong for passport fraud. In Missouri, he was convicted several times on theft and fraud charges, including a federal prosecution that resulted in a three-year prison term for wire fraud, bank fraud and passport fraud.

Riggs also has been the target of civil lawsuits, including a pending fraud and breach of contract case filed against him in Los Angeles by 31 people who say they invested about $2.8 million in his production company, Afterburner Films.

...In January, the FAA revoked Riggs' pilot's license. He appealed to the NTSB, which concurred with the FAA in March and ordered the revocation of Riggs' license, noting his "flagrant disregard for the rules."

...According to FAA documents, Sullivan and George Erdel, another FAA inspector, also were concerned that the L-39 Riggs owns was in disrepair -- a potential danger to the public -- and being used improperly as a camera platform for film shoots.

FAA reports show that Erdel and at least two other FAA inspectors discovered that repair records for the plane were incomplete or missing, including documentation that would have shown whether critical time-sensitive parts, such as fuel tanks and turbine blades, were replaced on schedule.
Click here for video</EMBED>
 
Did he think that nobody would notice?

Everybody has a cell phone camera these days, and somebody WILL send it to the FAA.
 
Actually, he probably wanted people to notice. In the article it says that he staged this stunt to promote a movie that he was producing.
 
Actually, he probably wanted people to notice. In the article it says that he staged this stunt to promote a movie that he was producing.

Yeah, it's called "How to lose your license in 16mb!"
 
I love this quote from the article:

Should the case go to trial, his attorney, John Duran, said he would assert that Holm is to blame. "The stunt involved two airplanes," Duran said. "My client was in the secondary plane. He was just following the pattern of Mr. Holm. They are going to have a hard time proving this case."

Yeah, that'll probably hold more weight than than the testimony of hundreds of spectators to the contrary, including the primary plane's pilot who was nowhere near the pier. Not to mention the video showing otherwise.

Says he's a movie director. He should get together with Uwe Boll, bet they could come up with some interesting stuff.
 
That was cool but only because I know what the guy is doing. And the chances of a soviet airplane flown by enemy pilots 100 feet from the pier would be about zero. But if you're a regular street person I could see how this could look wrong. I wish I was there!
 
Ha, I've met Dave Riggs on a couple of occasions. I have a friend who took a couple of rides in his L-39. Guy seemed somewhat nice but also was clearly proud of himself and his money and toys. When I talked to him, he told me his company produced movie previews/trailers. I'm not surprised he did this at all.
 
I can see the concern, but some people were running and screaming like the guy was a terrorist. He should'nt have been doing it, but some were over reacting.
 
I can see the concern, but some people were running and screaming like the guy was a terrorist. He should'nt have been doing it, but some were over reacting.


"OMG A JET that's doing absolutely nothing to us flying over an abundance of water! AHHHHH!
 
Everybody has a cell phone camera these days, and somebody WILL send it to the FAA.

There was an RV-4(?) that used to harass kite boarders on a local lake until someone snapped a very clear picture of him under the plexiglass. The plane was up for sale a little while later. :banghead:
 
I can see the concern, but some people were running and screaming like the guy was a terrorist. He should'nt have been doing it, but some were over reacting.
Obviously I'm not condoning what the guy did because it's reckless and stupid, but what happened to the days where people standing on the pier would think "holy crap, that's cool."? After all it's his certificate on the line, not mine.
 
"911, what is your emergency?"

"Yeah, my girlfriend and I are at the pier, eating ice cream and watching the sunset, and two military jets are flying low and flying fast."

"Sir, the police have been notified and your man card revoked."

-----

I can't think of a better day at the beach.
 
"911, what is your emergency?"

"Yeah, my girlfriend and I are at the pier, eating ice cream and watching the sunset, and two military jets are flying low and flying fast."

"Sir, the police have been notified and your man card revoked."

-----

I can't think of a better day at the beach.

What then, do we say of the abject mayhem that occurred in NYC when Air Force 1 and a pair of F-16s decided to make some leisurely circles around the Statue of Liberty? :)
 
What then, do we say of the abject mayhem that occurred in NYC when Air Force 1 and a pair of F-16s decided to make some leisurely circles around the Statue of Liberty? :)

you look up and see, hey cool its AF1 and some asskicking american fighter jets. SWEET.
 
Check out the NTSB's order concerning this guy's appeal of his license revocation.

http://ntsb.gov/alj/alj/O_n_O/docs/aviation/5436.PDF

He broke some major rules of engagement. ;)

Among the highlights:
NTSB Order No. EA-5436 said:
3. On your flight from VNY to the Santa Monica area, you
entered LAX [Los Angeles International Airport] Class B
airspace without an ATC clearance.

4. While in LAX Class B airspace, you flew N139CK at
indicated airspeeds in excess of 250 knots below 10,000
feet.

6. On at least two passes, you flew less than 500 feet
above the surface of the beach.

10. Your aerobatic maneuver was performed at an altitude
below 1,500 feet above the surface and within Santa
Monica Class D airspace and within 4 nautical miles of
the centerline of a Federal airway.

12. While in LAX Class B airspace, you flew N139CK at
indicated airspeeds in excess of 250 knots.

13. You also flew N139CK in the airspace underlying the LAX
Class B airspace at an indicated airspeed of more than
200 knots.
 
Back
Top