Mom!![]()
DME arc? I solved for the percentage of the circle I was flying around, endurance, not really, its fairly algebraic, Theory behind systems, I'm not a mechanic or an engineer no, but that doesn't stop me from wanting to truly understand the deeper physical principles behind the operations of my equipment. Scope? Scope? What you're saying is that it doesn't help to know math better, and frankly, that's ludicrous. Read through aerodyn for naval aviators, then when you realize that that isn't exactly a good explanation, buy a text book on fluid mechanics, then learn how to solve for a couple of equations. Ask TGrayson how little math helps him out. All credibility == lost.
I did not mean to demean you personally, but rather the attitude and outlook in your postings.
The airline job started as a whim. Something I decided to do to take a break from my business. Oh, yes, if I leave tomorrow it has been a great experience and I hope to continue, but it does not define me. While I am here I will try to learn all I can. I do not want to just do the minimum.
In some respects I must admit our academic preferences are similar. I studied Political Science in both my undergraduate and graduate degrees. It has served me well in my military profession, and international business career. However, I have found that my math studies have been indespensible to my success in many areas, and I often lament that I didn't know more. To quote a Naval Officer mentor I had a while back: "Be like a sponge, bear... Be like a sponge."
I think if one wants to master this profession, he should opt for a well rounded education, including math. I was under the impression the OP was younger and at this stage in his life.
Wait... As in Algebra I? :drool:Most advanced math course taken - high school algebra.
I know that Math and Sciences are very important things to proficient in when becoming a pilot.
I realize that Physics and calculus and stuff like that are necessary to have down, but do you really use it day-to-day as a pilot?
Also, I wanted to ask for anyone's opinion. Right now I have all A's and one B in Algebra (highest math class for my grade). Is it of high importance that I get high A's in math to become a pilot, or am I doing fine?
Bachelor of Arts from the University of Illinois in history.
Most advanced math course taken - high school algebra.
Navy Pilot, commuter pilot, major airline pilot.
Kevin
P.S. My son finished calculus in high school and is an Aerospace Engineering major at Iliinois with a minor in Math. He's taking a 400 level math course as a freshman - where did that come from?
So you're saying you convert, in your head, the number of degree's left in your arc, to miles, based on the distance you are away from the VOR?
Really?
EDIT: Oh wait, not really, my mistake I didn't read you correctly; you said as a percentage. As in "I have 30 degree's left to go. I started with 90 degree's to go, that means I'm 2/3 the way through."
Yay for division! Basic. Math.
I STILL call shenanigans.
Further, you haven't taken fluid dynamics; you haven't even finished an online degree from UVU in aviation flight science yet.
We can continue to compare length as long as you'd like, but talking about this stuff like you've taken upper division courses in them from a university is flat out wrong, unless you've got an engineering degree you're hiding from us eh?
I mean how in the world could I contend anything else when I have one of the most useful (from a practical application sense) degree's in the history of mankind? I'd love to pursue a masters degree in philosophy, it'd be really interesting in my mind. But will it help me to be a better pilot? Eh, probably not?
Actually I'd add basic vector algebra to the list of basic pilot math.
As for the Newtonian physics that John mentioned, be mindful that many books (including the FAA's) spread out a lot of bad information that can be easily misinterpreted. A deeper understanding of the math and physics involved will help you cut through the bull that is spread out by books and even CFIs.
To the OP:
The math for flying is not very difficult. You will never be calculating derivatives or doing contour integrations when flying on a day to day basis. However, as I said higher math will help you cut through the bad info and will help you understand, rather than take as gospel, the reasons why things work the way they do.![]()
I use the quadratic equation to calculate my intercept angle to the localizer on the fly!
Ugh, I hate those.I use the quadratic equation to calculate my intercept angle to the localizer on the fly!
I really like to emphasize the need for quick mental math. You never know you might not end up with an airplane that calculates your top of descent for crossing restrictions. Definitely a challenge trying to hold a 2:1 descent at redline completely raw data. If you didn't have solid basic math skills you wouldn't be able. I had alot of co-pilots that would just descend early to be sure they make the cross. Speed, time, and fuel are all wasted because they couldn't some simple calculations on the fly.
I did have a ground speed readout but that was about it.100% correct, and don't think all jets do the math for you!
We had to do it all mentally in the ERJ. Sure there was some horribly designed feature that would draw you a glidepath (and by draw a glidepath, I mean put up a deviation indicator that seemed like it was possessed), but I didn't trust it.
You can be pretty accurate using the mental math required to do descent planning. I'll be honest, though, we did have it a little easier in knowing what the winds were as we were descending.