Velocipede
New Member
I'm down with General Doug Lee.
Agreed.
Increased medical requirements would also be a form of discrimination. If you increase the requirements for pilots over 60, you must increase them for pilots under 60 as well. That would cost a whole lot of young guys their careers as well.
I don't hear them clamoring for that.
And no, medical examiners can't arbitrarily change the standards.
As an outsider, I just have to say that Velo expresses the most rational viewpoint on the Age 65 ruling that I've read...and there has been an immense amount of hot air vented on the internet on this topic.
So, bravo to you.
I'd agree; however, his delivery sucks more than a Dyson.
As an outsider, I just have to say that Velo expresses the most rational viewpoint on the Age 65 ruling that I've read...and there has been an immense amount of hot air vented on the internet on this topic.
.
We have every right too.. (It's in the FO's handbook, pg 1)![]()
If the senior guys are gonna hoard all the money/primo schedules while we get "another" 4000 hours SIC time, with an empty bank account followed up with a nice furlough, at least let us bitch and moan in peace
I honestly don't see how if a regional FO complains about it.. it's considered "entitlement" or "GREED"
Yet a Senior Captain (that was planning his entire career to retire at 60) can now choose to hang out in the top Pay Scales for 5 extra years.. and that's somehow NOT considered "GREED" or "entitlement"
What's the difference.. I'm not seeing it.. the labels seem to fit both groups to me.![]()
It couldn't suck any more than the Blackhawks.
WTF happened to you guys this year?
Haha.. that actually would make a really good book now that I think about it.. The new FO's handbook, following the lines of a Tucker Max "I hope they serve Beer in Hell" style story.. I already have a perfect title for it. I don't need to ever upgrade now, I'm gonna be rich beeatch..:bandit:Originally Posted by MikeD
lol.....It's sometimes said that pilots, like soldiers, could be sitting atop a pile of gold, and still find something to complain about!![]()
I'd agree; however, his delivery sucks more than a Dyson.
Age 65 was going to be shoved down our throats to comply with ICAO.
I think the beef that is caused was by the campaign in the US. The campaign, again needless since it WAS going to occur, was "We NEED five more years to save for retirement", thus the "I got mine, screw you" perception.
As an outsider you also don't have to eat the half million dollar+ pay hit that a lot of us got served for breakfast Dec 07
Its a very easy point to overlook if you happen to be in the left seat at your career airline when the music stops, because it does not significantly effect you financially.
Some of us don't want or have any intention of doing this job until age 65 so we will never make the loss up
10yr regional FO's isn't what we signed up for, We didn't know the "stepping stone" paychecks would become a permanent thing.. A lot of folks would have made a different career choice if they knew this was coming.. (hence the bitching)
Yes, we all realize things can change rapidly in this industry and Yes, we have accepted age 65 as the newest kick in the nuts (whether we agree with it or not).. but we are gonna bitch about it for the rest of our careers.. We have every right too..
If the senior guys are gonna hoard all the money/primo schedules while we get "another" 4000 hours SIC time, with an empty bank account followed up with a nice furlough, at least let us bitch and moan in peace![]()
I honestly don't see how if a regional FO complains about it.. it's considered "entitlement" or "GREED"
If the senior guys are gonna hoard all the money/primo schedules while we get "another" 4000 hours SIC time, with an empty bank account followed up with a nice furlough, at least let us bitch and moan in peace![]()
Yet a Senior Captain (that was planning his entire career to retire at 60) can now choose to hang out in the top Pay Scales for 5 extra years.. and that's somehow NOT considered "GREED" or "entitlement"
And to the point Hacker made, yeah I agree that Velo makes a great argument; very rational and sensible. One that I competely agree with, for whatever that is worth given my standing in this world. Keeping it civil would make it even stronger though and attract more people to his case.
As an outsider you also don't have to eat the half million dollar+ pay hit that a lot of us got served for breakfast Dec 07..
YES!
But, you assume too much.
1. That you're even good enough to get hired by any airline except a regional. Face facts, you may just be a career regional pilot regardless of how many job openings there are at the majors.
I understand that completely.. all I'm saying is age 65 is one of them..The point is, there are a LOT of rocks in the road to the left seat of a 777. Very few (relatively) make it. Age 65 isn't the only thing in the way.
I understand it effects you guys as well, just not nearly as much. There is a HUGE difference between going from 130K to 160K vs. going from 45K to even 90K.. It definitely sucks both ways for both sides.. but there IS a difference.But what YOU don't realize is that Age 65 IS effecting me significantly financially. I don't have the seniority to bid lines that afford me the kind of time off that allows me to participate in our time and a half program. I could be earning $30-$50K MORE a year if I could hold that kind of schedule. However, that has receded at least 5 years into the future.
Regardless if I make it to a 777, Its effecting me and everyone around me NOW at my current Airline and it is a loss. I have accepted this may very well be a possible career path now.. I don't know if I ever want to be at the bottom of a list again. If it wasn't for age 65 and having the music stop I could at least very likely be sitting in the left seat making 100k vs 45K on my next W2. NONE of our Captains are leaving at 60 voluntarily now and we have a lot of senior pilots at my airline.. they can't afford to go.. 401k's wiped out and plenty of other factors. Again, I'm not blaming anyone for staying, it IS there choice now.But, its not a loss if you never had it. Revisit all those reasons YOU may never make it to the left seat of a 777. I never will. And, believe me that was my career goal when I left the Navy.
We did realize thats how the Airline industry was.. but ALL IM SAYING is age 65 wasn't part of it before.. there isn't really any way to do homework on something that wasn't much talked about in 2002..Then you either didn't do your homework or you have a hopelessy Pollyanna view of the airline industry. Airline flying has always been cyclical. And pilot salaries have always be in flux.
So who is to blame if YOU didn't realize those facts?
yes I am.. life is good, even though I'm flat broke I manage to always have a good time.I guess its true...a bitching pilot is a happy pilot. You must be ecstatic! :laff:
This is the part I like.. you can come down on others but when it comes down to it, you are no different. It is blatently obvious YOU feel like you're better than us because you have that magical military time.. and you paid your dues more than we did..Listen, mate. I did my 11.5 years of time in the Navy trying to get the qualifications to get a major airline job. I have over 5200 hours of MILITARY flight time, a huge number by the standards of what the average pilot was flying in the '80s. Quals are flexible too. Just last year, the regionals were hiring guys with 500/50 if you remember.
Been there, done that, have the T-shirt and the scars to prove it.. I worked as a contract commercial diver with the Navy Divers for over 4 years, in some of the nastiest places on the planet, I watched many friends get killed and mamed every year.. I have my months of sea time.. again, not that it matters.But, if the moaning about how "unfair" life is makes you feel better, have at it. Just don't expect much sympathy from those of us who have put in time doing 11 month cruises, fought wars in the desert or suffered 18 month unaccompanied tours to get where we are.
There it is again.. more of the condescending your better than us military attitude.. Its ok, I'm used to it, its a notorious attitude at AA..Regional F/O "dues" don't begin to match military "dues".
Of course Im concerned with my pay and upgrade, everyone here is.. I NEVER said I wasn't greedy in that respect.. Anyone who says otherwise would be lying. But you can't say the Senior Captains aren't being greedy as well. They ARE.. and they are entitled too, just as we are entitled to complain about it.. its the new law. I can't fault them for it, and I would never tell some Captain he needs to retire, it's his choice.. but I can sure say why we aren't happy about it....so YOU are the one who seems overly concerned with pay rates and schedules reflected by YOUR frustration with your inability to upgrade. Sounds pretty much like the textbook definition of greed to me.
There is a difference between facts and 'rationalizing' things.. this topic wen't off the facts in about 2 seconds.. as it always does.The difference is that WE were planning on leaving at 60 due to regulatory restrictions. The law changed. Did that create a windfall for some guys? Sure it did. Do they still retain the right to retire at 60 (or 55 or 45)? Sure they do. Just the same as YOU do. IF you make it to the left seat of a major airline.
I guess you're assuming I'm trying to convince someone of something. I just point out the cold, hard facts. Some people have their heads buried in a sand dune of denial.
You are the 348,729th person to express this argument on the internet...and, sorry, still not buying it.
Somebody is not "robbing" you of anything...there was never anything you HAD to start with. You might have THOUGHT you did...but you didn't.