ClearedForOption
Psychiatric Help 5¢
I think that the real discussion here is more subtle than the same 'piling on CC thing' that happens to go on in just about every thread.
There are a lot of issues that can stem from these 'for profit' ab-initio programs, this is history both echoing and rhyming.
Really, the one thing that stands out to me is this: (from the reddit post)
UAA fosters a culture of intimidation. Many students have been let go after speaking out or complaining to hire-ups for vague reasons, and therefore students currently at the school are too scared to speak out. School management constantly has all eyes and ears open for any sign of dissent or criticism and is looking over everyone’s shoulder.
The questions to ask are:
1.) Is a single source Reddit post really journalism? (or sour grapes?)
2.) What EXACTLY is the contract between the student and the trade school? Those of us that have been around the block a couple of times (and also have been 'ripped off' by operators at the beginning of our careers) know that there is a shady money-grab side to aviation. Follow the money.
3.) This anon 'whistle-blower': what does their training history show? Why all the complaints about the length of the course? Is there an actual training deficiency problem? Are they teaching people to be professional aviators? (are the just teaching the test?)
There is more to this story than what can be summed up in an online rant.
What all of this tells me is that aviation, in this country, is still not set up/ready for a 100% civilian ab-initio pilot pipeline program without more structure. If that's what the industry is hoping for as the 'magic' solution to the pilot-labor crisis, then it's falling short of expectations. From all sides. Possible shady management. Students that might have whatever today's version of SJS is. (or whatever we end up calling it) Expectations of results that aren't realistic (Sold a pipe-dream from a recruiter) to a misunderstanding of what probationary employee means. (rocking the boat vs. hitting the books) We don't know.
But it's sure gonna be fun to talk about and speculate on.
There are a lot of issues that can stem from these 'for profit' ab-initio programs, this is history both echoing and rhyming.
Really, the one thing that stands out to me is this: (from the reddit post)
UAA fosters a culture of intimidation. Many students have been let go after speaking out or complaining to hire-ups for vague reasons, and therefore students currently at the school are too scared to speak out. School management constantly has all eyes and ears open for any sign of dissent or criticism and is looking over everyone’s shoulder.
The questions to ask are:
1.) Is a single source Reddit post really journalism? (or sour grapes?)
2.) What EXACTLY is the contract between the student and the trade school? Those of us that have been around the block a couple of times (and also have been 'ripped off' by operators at the beginning of our careers) know that there is a shady money-grab side to aviation. Follow the money.
3.) This anon 'whistle-blower': what does their training history show? Why all the complaints about the length of the course? Is there an actual training deficiency problem? Are they teaching people to be professional aviators? (are the just teaching the test?)
There is more to this story than what can be summed up in an online rant.
What all of this tells me is that aviation, in this country, is still not set up/ready for a 100% civilian ab-initio pilot pipeline program without more structure. If that's what the industry is hoping for as the 'magic' solution to the pilot-labor crisis, then it's falling short of expectations. From all sides. Possible shady management. Students that might have whatever today's version of SJS is. (or whatever we end up calling it) Expectations of results that aren't realistic (Sold a pipe-dream from a recruiter) to a misunderstanding of what probationary employee means. (rocking the boat vs. hitting the books) We don't know.
But it's sure gonna be fun to talk about and speculate on.