You're a SouthernJets International 767ER....

Seggy

Seggy

Well-Known Member
...Commander. You depart MXP for the flight to JFK. On climbout, when you go engage the autopilot, it does not come on, you run the QRH and determine that your autopilot will not be working this flight.

What do you do? Keep in mind...

-RVSM requirements and company SOP for the use of autopilot in RVSM airspace

-A strong headwind

-You are way above max landing weight when you determine that you will have no autopilot

-Weather is iffy at JFK, you might need to shoot a CAT III approach 10 hours from now or it might be at ILS mins, the forecast can go either way
 
SteveC said:
I foresee an overnight in Bergamo or Lake Garda.

:)
Click to expand...


That is what I would want BUT consider this..

Let me preface this by saying I have NO idea about the weights in relation to the 767ER, but say that you take off at MAX to weight. How long will it take for you to burn enough fuel to land under MAX landing weight. Would you want to dump fuel? Would you want to do circles over Europe to burn the fuel? Or would you continue and see if MX can figure something out?
 
Well, I sure as heck wouldn't want to hand fly a 767ER at 280 all the way across the pond, not even knowing if I could land or not.

It's not another famous turboprop operator without a union up in the northeast and you probably are not expected to hand fly across the pond; burn (or dump) the gas and land it back where you were.
 
jtrain609 said:
It's not another famous turboprop operator without a union up in the northeast and you probably are not expected to hand fly across the pond; burn (or dump) the gas and land it back where you were.
Click to expand...


Something in this paragraph will change. Will it be the hand flying part or the union part? ;)



































































:D
 
I'd ask the company what they want me to do. The 767 hand flys really nice and it's legal to fly without an autopilot, so I wouldn't turn around just for that. If I had good weather at several places within my fuel reserves, and the company wanted me to press on (which they probably would), I'd press on. Being over landing weight iat the moment isn't a problem, you could land overweight or dump. As far as RSVM, I'd get the company to send me a new burn for whatever altitude I could work out with ATC.

The 767 has three independent autopilots, by the way.
 
On this general topic, here's another hypothetical:

You're scheduled for a night flight into one of the more challenging mountain airports in the west that's famous for its windshear. Weather at this airport is reporting crosswinds gusting to 30kts, with only a back course loc approach available. Visibility is both forecast and reported to be at mins for the BC LOC. The crew bringing the plane in has called MX out to defer the autopilot and both flight directors, meaning raw data, hand flown, with no wind shear guidance. What would you do?
 
1. Have the FO fly the plane. Always have no doubt on who is flying the aircraft and make sure someone is heads up the whole time.
2. Checklist and work the problem with the other FO (remember there are 2 on this leg). Put MX and dispatch into the loop and figure out the optimum solution.
3. More than likely dump and simply return to MXB if the problem cannot be fixed in the air. Remember: keep it simple. There is no real reason to land overweight in this situation, either.


A malfunctioning autopilot is not all that likely to cause a situation like this, but this can work for any mechanical issue.
 
zmiller4 said:
On this general topic, here's another hypothetical:

You're scheduled for a night flight into one of the more challenging mountain airports in the west that's famous for its windshear. Weather at this airport is reporting crosswinds gusting to 30kts, with only a back course loc approach available. Visibility is both forecast and reported to be at mins for the BC LOC. The crew bringing the plane in has called MX out to defer the autopilot and both flight directors, meaning raw data, hand flown, with no wind shear guidance. What would you do?
Click to expand...



That would not be deferrable- If the AP is deferred, you have to have 2 working flight directors.

If they tried to get you to ferry the thing- refuse it. It's unsafe and a bad idea. Are you willing to bet your certificate and life on someone's judgement who is sitting in a desk hundreds of miles away from the situation?
 
zmiller4 said:
On this general topic, here's another hypothetical:

You're scheduled for a night flight into one of the more challenging mountain airports in the west that's famous for its windshear. Weather at this airport is reporting crosswinds gusting to 30kts, with only a back course loc approach available. Visibility is both forecast and reported to be at mins for the BC LOC. The crew bringing the plane in has called MX out to defer the autopilot and both flight directors, meaning raw data, hand flown, with no wind shear guidance. What would you do?
Click to expand...

I don't see the problem, that's a normal day.
 
jtrain609 said:
I don't see the problem, that's a normal day.
Click to expand...

Come on, I knew you would post something like that, but I didn't think it would take you that long! Slacker! :)

Seriously, though, there's some major differences between flying a Navajo, at 90kts, with no passengers, that you're trained to fly on steam gauges, and flying a plane at 150kts on a non-precision approach with lots of step downs with an instrument configuration that is abnormal for every day operations.
 
Mark, I know whare you got that idea from. :D

There is nothing wrong with flying a 767 from Italy to NYC with no autopilot.:D

Its a 9.5 hour flight and there is three of you. Rotate the duties the entire way back. Each person will hand fly for 3 hours.
 
OldTownPilot said:
Mark, I know whare you got that idea from. :D

There is nothing wrong with flying a 767 from Italy to NYC with no autopilot.:D

Its a 9.5 hour flight and there is three of you. Rotate the duties the entire way back. Each person will hand fly for 3 hours.
Click to expand...

Having never flown a 767 I'll ask this question.

Couldn't you in this situation just trim the plane and keep a constant speed so that your hands wouldn't have to be on the yoke for three hours if it is level flight with no altitute or heading changes?
 
Maximillian_Jenius said:
Having never flown a 767 I'll ask this question.

Couldn't you in this situation just trim the plane and keep a constant speed so that your hands wouldn't have to be on the yoke for three hours if it is level flight with no altitute or heading changes?
Click to expand...

Max-

It's stable, but not that stable! I hand fly it up to altitude and from top-of descent to landing all the time but 8 + hours in cruise would be torture...

Kevin
 
zmiller4 said:
:)
Seriously, though, there's some major differences between flying a Navajo, at 90kts, with no passengers, that you're trained to fly on steam gauges, and flying a plane at 150kts on a non-precision approach with lots of step downs with an instrument configuration that is abnormal for every day operations.
Click to expand...

Approach speeds are a 120 to 125 according to our SOP! And I've been known to out run RJ's and 737's on approach a time or two. Man us chieftan/navajo drivers gets know respect.:sarcasm::)
 
"but 8 + hours in cruise would be torture..."

I agree. That's why I'd want to spread it around the crew. At the same time, torture has never been a reason to ground an airplane. We get tortured all the time. It's in the contract, even....hehe....
 
zmiller4 said:
Come on, I knew you would post something like that, but I didn't think it would take you that long! Slacker! :)

Seriously, though, there's some major differences between flying a Navajo, at 90kts, with no passengers, that you're trained to fly on steam gauges, and flying a plane at 150kts on a non-precision approach with lots of step downs with an instrument configuration that is abnormal for every day operations.
Click to expand...

Oh we're much faster than that, boss. We're 120 until about decision height on an ILS, and we'll do 180 in the terminal environment until maybe 3-5 miles from the marker

And I don't care if I have people or boxes behind me - a CFIT accident has the same result on the pointy end where the office is at.
 
I do have to give credit to OldTownPilot who told me that this did happen. Thought it would make for a good post.

OldTownPilot = THE MAN










Don, yeah figured that three autopilots one would work, but who knows what gremlins the plane might have.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top