CapnJim said:I reject the notion that a 1000 hour airline pilot is significantly 'safer' than a 250 hour one. The data just do not bear this out. Seems to make sense on the surface, but it's more speculation than science.
B767Driver said:.......
As for data...there was a study a while back...I think the Hilton study...that found that inexperienced pilots made 3 times as many mistakes as experienced pilots....however, I don't recall what passed for "experienced" and "inexperienced" and I don't recall the medium of observation. .....
Chris_Ford said:Do you think if the general public knew that people with THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY HOURS OF TOTAL TIME and LESS THAN 25 MULTI are flying hundreds of people around a day? Dateline NBC could have a field day with this.
supercell86 said:You think 300TT is low....as I said my instructor's friend.....20 years old....250TT, and he's an F/O on the CRJ for Mesa....he's also flying the CRJ-900 (he's based in PHX)...why I specifically mention that aircraft is just the simple fact that you have someone second in command with 250TT on a RJ that fits almost 100 people on it....I'm not gunna sit here and write about how scary that it or whatever....but it kinda gets my attention.....has he even been in IMC![]()
supercell86 said:Absolutly...that's why its not really scary it just amazes the hell outa me! Probably because I could be flying one of those RJ's very soon if I wanted, but I don't have SJS that bad...yet....
Maximillian_Jenius said:I cry fowl...
Maximillian_Jenius said:I cry fowl...from the website!
JEP said:Looks like the "Hilton Study" referred to the age 60 rule..... Still digging....
B767Driver said:.......
As for data...there was a study a while back...I think the Hilton study...that found that inexperienced pilots made 3 times as many mistakes as experienced pilots....however, I don't recall what passed for "experienced" and "inexperienced" and I don't recall the medium of observation. .....
Pilot Experience
A pilot’s flying experience, usually thought of in terms of
total flight hours, is often regarded by the public as the best
indicator for safety. There is undoubtedly some truth to this,
although last year’s Nall Report found that student pilots
had relatively few accidents (7.7 percent of all accidents)
even though they accounted for 15.3 percent of the total
pilot population. Private, commercial, and airline transport
pilots, however, were all involved in more accidents than
their representation in the total pilot population should
support. One possible explanation for this apparent anomaly
is in the higher degree of supervision exercised over student
pilots, and the fact that most flight training is conducted
in good weather conditions, and in carefully controlled
circumstances.
This year, ASF correlated total and fatal accidents in 2002
with the reported hours of experience of the pilot in command.
Not surprisingly, pilots with 500 or fewer total hours
accounted for 37.3 percent of all accidents, and 30.8 percent
of fatal accidents, while the absolute lowest involvement
in fatal accidents was by pilots with between 2,001
and 2,500 total hours. ASF studies have shown that low
pilot time in type is often a significant contributing factor in
accidents. Transitioning to a new aircraft, even one that is
less complex, can cause problems for experienced pilots as
well as novices.
Please note that these are raw numbers, and have not been
adjusted for exposure. Neither the FAA nor the NTSB keeps
records that show the distribution of experience levels in the
pilot population, nor records that could be used to gauge the
amount of flying done in any specific year by any given group
of pilots with a similar experience level.
wheelsup said:http://flightcareers.com/
I used to instruct there. In fact, I just got off the phone with a couple former students who I signed off for their commercial checkrides in August of last year, and are in or through training @ mesa, all with less than 250 TT. The lowest time guy I saw that went to Mesa was @ 220 or there abouts.
They used to put them in the 1900, but now they are going into the CRJ almost exclusively. There's even a non-certified CRJ sim in Farmington that the students get something like 40 hours in before going into the interview.
~wheelsup
Maximillian_Jenius said:I wasn't talking about total time. I'm aware that if a flight school has an agreement with a regional mins are reduced greatly. No the minson the website are for people off the street.
But I cried fowl because he said his friend who is 20 is an F/O flying a CRJ-900. Every regional out there has a stated age of 21 or older. Again I cry fowl.
FlyChicaga said:God forbid.
Seeing how these threads keep popping up daily, I recommend that nobody here go fly any airline in Europe. I mean, all those low time pilots. I met a KLM pilot starting as a relief pilot on the B747-400 with 400 hours last year.
.
CapnJim said:B767, those are interesting points, and I'd like to see the data before I'm totally convinced.
If you think that no one under 2500 hours should be in an airliner, where should those hours come from? 2500 hours of sitting in a Seminole won't do the job. Cargo? Are there enough jobs? Hm!
Maximillian_Jenius said:Maaaaaaaan there is alot of whoring going on,on the site...and I don't get paid till Friday!
![]()