Why airline lay off the most junior staffs

That's true, so after 20 years with a company it won't be a problem to uproot yourself and move overseas so some young hot shot with more balls than brains can take your place...that's all, I won't be entertaining this nonsense anymore. Oh, and it's "figment"

Just because we are young, then we must be "hot shot with more balls than brains"?

By the way, I did mean fragment, not figment.
 
It's not teenager typing on their cellphone. It's short hand typing, it saves time. Try it sometime

There's no reason for hostility. I was simply trying to be helpful. "Short hand" typing, while it may save time, doesn't read professionally. On a text-based communication platform, the way you write is one of the main ways people can get a feel for you. Look around the forum... very few people use short hand.

And you didn't answer my question - what is your aviation background?
 
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm:popcorn::banghead::tmyk::nana2::clap::rotfl:

Does that cover it? jwong, you're kidding, right?
 
Just because we are young, then we must be "hot shot with more balls than brains"?

By the way, I did mean fragment, not figment.

Quite simply, yes, you can type how wish and be as nice as you wish. Just understand that this community is accustomed to a specific style of conversation. Some will welcome you regardless. Some will tell you that you should try using tact some time.
 
There has been a question I don't understand. Why is that whenever there is a furlough, airlines furlough the most junior personnel. If the point of a furlough is to reduce cost of labor. Wouldn't it make sense to furlough from the most senior persons?

One of the reasons for having a union is to prevent exactly that from happening.

Even if there were no union preventing this, if an airline did layoff their most senior pilots, they would expect lawsuits for age discrimination. The AEDA does not apply to workers under 40, so it is generally safer to lay off younger workers.
 
It's not teenager typing on their cellphone. It's short hand typing, it saves time. Try it sometime

Sadly, that's how it's coming off, though. You've got a full keyboard (I'm assuming). Use it. Honestly, it takes me LESS time at this point to type out words than hitting the space bar every few seconds to space out individual letters. Typing in complete words and sentences also tends to portray the speaker/typist in a more intelligent light. Think of it this way: if you were hiring someone based on a resume, would you hire someone that typed it in "leet speek" or took the time to type it properly?
 
One of the reasons for having a union is to prevent exactly that from happening.

Even if there were no union preventing this, if an airline did layoff their most senior pilots, they would expect lawsuits for age discrimination. The AEDA does not apply to workers under 40, so it is generally safer to lay off younger workers.

So instead of discriminating the old people, they discriminate young people instead.....o well, let's hope that the most junior staff isn't older than 40. Thanks Drunkenbeagle, you are the only who actually gave an explanation that makes some sort of sense.
 
We're still waiting for your answer jowong1...

Found it:

jwong1 said:
Why is it that everyone says CFI is the "best move" they ever made and that they learn a lot, blah blah blah.....I m a CFI as well, but I dont think I know more now than I did when I was a newly minted commercial...All I get everyday is temperamental customers (notice I use the word customer, NOT student) who don't speak English well enough to talk on the radio and get mad at me for putting my fingers at the control.
 
Wow... my first canidate for the ignore list. Way to go jwong1, I have been on this site for almost 5 years now and you are the first one. The problem is not that you are asking questions, the problem is the way you ask it and then come back all argumentive. Another thing is I really think you are flaming us because for anyone to think that a reward for seniority is to be furloughed is crazy. Sounds like management talk.
 
Reading this feels like when my daughter asks me something, gets an answer and keeps saying why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why?...

or in this case yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.
 
It's not teenager typing on their cellphone. It's short hand typing, it saves time. Try it sometime

Text speak, "short hand typing", whatever you want to call it, tends to be hard on the eyes to read. We discourage it. We're asking you politely to please write out your words. :)

Act on this board as you would act in front of a group of people who can directly affect the future of your career. Because you know what? There are a LOT of people on this board who can directly affect your career! There are people here who are on hiring committees for several airlines and corporate flight departments, if you present a positive, professional image here, those people can help you get a job! Really! There have been many jobs found via networking on this site.

Now, as for the seniority issue.... The seniority list concept has been in place at the airlines for decades. It is not a perfect system, but it is a very good system. It eliminates brown-nosing for raises, upgrades or transfers, it lets everyone start on equal footing, and eliminates ALL possibility of pay differential on basis of age, sex, gender, etc. All 4th year F/Os make $X.XX per hour. Period.
 
So instead of discriminating the old people, they discriminate young people instead.....o well, let's hope that the most junior staff isn't older than 40. Thanks Drunkenbeagle, you are the only who actually gave an explanation that makes some sort of sense.

Seniority doesn't make sense? If it doesn't, you might want to re-think careers, cause that's the way things go.
 

I think this is more age-discriminating than laying off people over 40!

I am not trying to flame this discussion, like I said, Drunkenbeagle is the only one who actually provided some insight, other people only give those entitlement BS because "I have been with the company for 20 years".

I understand how the seniority list works, but I don't see how it should affect people's job security. I am only talking about job security, not pay, not scheduling. Pay and scheduling etc should be awarded according to seniority but with the reasons I stated when I started the thread, furloughing from the top of the seniority list seems to make financial sense.
 
Back
Top